Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay work by bertrand russell
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay work by bertrand russell
There are many great minds and philosophers discussed in our book and also discussed in class. People from Aristotle to Socrates That really paved the way for people in our generation.
I decided to pick someone that was a pioneer for philosophy just like these gentleman mentioned previous, and that is Bertrand Russell. Russell was a great thinker, philosopher, and even a mathematician. He was never shy to take a viewpoint on any matter, sometimes his viewpoints even changed which is one thing I find very admirable of Mr. Russell, he was always welcoming of different points and could be persuaded if he felt as if he may be wrong and or lacking correct information. Living from 1872-1970 he had a very full life of a miraculous ninety eight years.
…show more content…
He once said, “Either man will abolish war, or war will abolish man.” This is very direct and to the point that he is trying to make that society needs to get rid of war. While I do see where Mr. Russell is coming from, I feel like war is a part of life and will always be, war is a way for people and countries to show power and also a way for people to be punished for their actions. Without war I believe our world would actually be a more devastating place rather than a more peaceful place because there would not be consequences for the actions of leaders. If you think about World War II and how the allies infiltrated Normandy and took over control of the terror that was going on in Germany, without war who knows, Hitler’s army might still be in power in Germany and taking advantage of millions of people. The argument I make towards Bertrand is that there is always going to be evil in the world, and there will always be people that try to take advantage of others for their own personal gain, while it may take something drastic like World War II to see it, war can bring positive things to the …show more content…
Russell’s beliefs was that God is not real. This in fact is probably the biggest of his works, many of the videos I watched were interviews with Mr. Russell were in regards to his views on religion. He was very outspoken about and against religion with quotes such as, “Religion is based ... mainly upon fear ... fear of the mysterious, fear of defeat, fear of death. Fear is the parent of cruelty, and therefore it is no wonder if cruelty and religion have gone hand in hand. My own view on religion is that of Lucretius. I regard it as a disease born of fear and as a source of untold misery to the human race.” While he does make some intriguing points about religion, I feel as if much of what he is saying very contradictory. One reason I find him contradicting himself is because the first quote I heard of his, “Philosophy consists of speculation about matters where exact knowledge is not possible.” by saying this Russell is admitting that philosophy as a whole is consisting of speculation, and by that logic would his views on religion be speculation? I do realize on the contrary that he makes a very similar point to that there is no proof of religion, but by what he is saying philosophy is all speculation. Another reason I disagree with his views on religion is the argument posed to us by Aristotle that we talked about in class and that being that, “Anyone that does not believe in God is a fool.” He says this because if you say that you do not
Aristotle believes that society should achieve eternal happiness and just acts. Plato was also an influential philosopher due to his study of the nature of truths and virtues. Thomas Aquinas believed in moral and virtuous acts from a Spiritual perspective. Knowledge and the governance of the law relies on the contribution of several different effective
In the novel, My Brother Sam is Dead, by James and Christopher Collier, they teach that there are many other ways to solve conflict besides war. War is violent, disgusting, and gruesome and so many people die in war. Families separate in war because of how many people want to be in the thrill of the war and also how many innocent family members die in the midst of war. Lastly, war is worthless and it was caused by a disagreement over something little and the outcome of war is not worth the many lives, time, and money and there are other ways to solve conflict besides to fight. War causes so many negative outcomes on this world that it needs to be avoided at all costs.
According to Boswell “Some writers believe that war is necessary to take off the superfluity of the human species, or at least rid the world of numbers of idle and profligate men who are a burden upon every community.” However, these writers are missing one important aspect on the issue. Not only men, but also innocent women and children have been killed in war. While these writers’ opinions may be correct, it still does not justify all the deaths of victims of war. Boswell also states, “As more beautiful material forms sometimes arise from the ashes of others.” In order to get something beneficial out of war, something else must be given; and in this case, what has been given is human
War is a hard thing to describe. It has benefits that can only be reaped through its respective means. Means that, while necessary, are harsh and unforgiving. William James, the author of “The Moral Equivalent of War”, speaks only of the benefits to be had and not of the horrors and sacrifices found in the turbulent times of war. James bears the title of a pacifist, but he heralds war as a necessity for society to exist. In the end of his article, James presents a “war against nature” that would, in his opinion, stand in war’s stead in bringing the proper characteristics to our people. However, my stance is that of opposition to James and his views. I believe that war, while beneficial in various ways, is unnecessary and should be avoided at all costs.
Wilfred Owen’s “Dulce et Decorum Est” is a poem about World War I. Owen describes the horrors of war he has witnessed first-hand after enlisting in the war. Prior to his encounter with war he was a devote Christian with an affinity towards poetry, and after being swayed by war agitprop he returned home to enlist in the army; Owen was a pacifist and was at his moral threshold once he had to kill a man during the war. The poem goes into detail about what the soldiers had to endure according to Owen, “many had lost their boots / but limped on, blood-shod. All went lame; all blind; / drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots” (5-7). Owen’s conclusion to the poem is that “the old Lie; dulce et decorum est / pro patria mori” (27-28), Latin for “it is sweet and right to die for your country,” is not easily told when one has experienced war. In his detailed poem Owen writes about the true terrors of war and that through experience you would probably change your conceived notion about dying for your country.
Karl Marx. His ability to 'stick to his guns' regardless of the outcome is what
...should examine their life and be able to question the world also, give people freedom. On the other hand is Aristotle, he showed the Political Theory in human that human reason and resources are their guides and yet, it is others life style. Furthermore, Plato, he used the Allegory of the Cave to show how Philosopher see the Absolute Truth and due to the fact how people perceive the truth and how people view of reality can be bound. Also, the Greeks contribution in Art, they used the Discuss Thrower, the Greeks Columns, and The Parthenon to show people how Greeks are good in sculpturing and to show the 3D-dimensional perspective. Lastly, is Democracy where people are the ruler also the Council of 500 of Cleisthenes because of this our civilization today has a direct democracy, without further do, Democracy, Art, and Philosophy has influenced our society astonishingly.
Russell was in a bible group in Pittsburgh. Pennsylvania, but Russel had problems with the beliefs of some of Christianity. He didn’t believe in beliefs like the Holy Trinity, hellfire, and the immortality of the soul. Russel together with Barlow started a religious journal
Chatfield, Charles, Bertrand Russell, and Ralph Barton Perry. The Ethics of War: Bertrand Russell and Ralph Barton Perry on World War I. New York: Garland Pub., 1972. Print.
My Speech is about the scientists who had the main influence on our current time and have shaped our contemporary view of the world (Also called in Theology the "Zeitgeist").
In Chapter One Bertrand Russell basically wants to know the true meaning of “reality”. The truth is that “reality” can never truly be determined. I say this because there is a difference between believing and actually knowing. For example I know the desk in the front of the classroom is real. I know this because all of my senses concur. Now when I try to determine to color, the texture or even the shape of the desk I will run into a problem.
Greek philosophers Aristotle and Plato were two of the most influential and knowledgeable ancients in our history. Their contributions and dedication to science, language and politics are immensely valued centuries later. But while the two are highly praised for their works, they viewed several subjects entirely differently, particularly education practices, and human ethics and virtue.
We were looking around various people from Ancient Greece when we happened upon Hippocrates. He appeared to have done a number of things for medicine and his statements on what causes disease, which completely went against popular belief. Our teacher said we had to put down three choices, which she would then choose from, and we put Hippocrates on there. She ultimately ended up choosing him over the others.
With regards to influential peers, I would say Timothy Mullen influenced my thinking throughout the course. We seemed to have the same thought process on some of the topics. One of his comments that stood out the most to me
Among the most revered philosophers of all time was Socrates. Living around the 5th century B.C.,