Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare socialism and capitalism
Social inequality and its effects
Similarities between capitalism vs socialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare socialism and capitalism
"A Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference," Thomas Jefferson once said. We, as people under the Constitution of the United States, hold these to be our unalienable rights. As of now, they're in jeopardy to what is known as socialism, the sugarcoated 'equal society' that may strip us of those fundamental rights. From my point of view, I believe a socialistic society would not function properly and even more so, would cause an economic fallout. I know I wouldn't want my rights taken away and decisions made for me, but now that is up to you decide as you listen to my following statements. We all know hard work comes with rewards such as satisfaction, …show more content…
and perhaps a paycheck. When you work hard in life, you reap its benefits, but under socialism, there will be no rewards for hard work. For example, if one man works all day and another man only works a half of a day, under socialism, they will both get paid the same wage. The creates an environment in which people begin to feel entitled to things for minimal to no work, making it unfair to those who work harder. In return, these people who continue to give 100% will then give up like the others leading to a degrading society, for a lack of better words, we will turn into losers. Was this the dream for America, the land of the innovators, the land of the people who change the world? Socialism will take that away, will take America's heart and soul away. Going back to the topic of destroying innovation, without the great American inventors that make this country great, we would be nothing. America did great things, we built the locomotive, the plane, invented the computer, pushed limits and then some. When we begin to spread the wealth too evenly, we kill innovation because everyone strives to do great things, not because it benefits those around them, but also the fame and wealth that comes with it. We look up to innovators, many young people wanting to become like one of them as they grow older. Socialism is a dream killer, innovation crusher because nobody will strive to be any better because 'they are already like everyone else'. A great example of this is giving everyone in the class the class average grade. The students who would have most likely failed the class would love the idea, but those who worked hard and put in the effort would be upset. Socialism is the Bermuda grass of innovation, day by day, little by little, it will eventually choke ideas and dreams out. People who speak for and promote this idea may say that socialism creates and equal society in which nobody is higher than another and nobody will ever go hungry and underdressed again.
That statement may lure many of you in because of the benefits. Don't let the fool you, that's just the beatiful surface that covers the dark, dull life that lies underneath. Honestly, these benefits sound great, but I know enough that everyone in the United States has equal opportunity to do this themselves. That's what makes this country great, why many other are envious of us. The people who see that don't seem to be equal and not well fed, don't be fooled by many of them. I know we should care and do something, but we can't fix them, we can only fix ourselves. The best thing to do with the hungry people is to empathize with them, not sympathize. Help them on their feet again, but from then on, then it's their responsibility to get a job and maintain a steady paycheck to supply for themselves. They eventually can better themselves and climb higher in the world, because that what America is and that is what Americans do. Socialism sounds sincere, but undermines hard work, and takes away equal opportunity, America's most prized
privilege. Abraham Lincoln once said, "America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." I could not agree more. America has been a leader of the world for many years, and deserves to continue as the world leader. Implemeting socialism would be the death of us, it will destroy us. I don't think any of you out there want that because after so much that America has been through and overcome, I wouldn't want to see it go down. I have a message for you listening right now, become America's next leader, innovate new ideas, strive to become better than what you are right now, and most importantly, don't let socialism get in your head and shoved down your throat, fight for your freedom, your forefathers did.
America has the highest overall and childhood poverty rate of any major industrialized country on earth. Nearly 45,000 people die in the United States each year, mostly because they lack health insurance and cannot get beneficial care. From an economic perspective and as the government tries to fight its way out of this terrible recession, it makes no sense that the United States ignores numerous citizens who could be of such great help (Sen. Bernie Sanders). Poverty in America is about a lack of basic necessities and an uncertainty as to where to get food, an uncertainty how to pay your most bills, and it's about a dependence on either imperfect government institutions or overwhelmed private charities. Even though the United States does not have starvation,...
The English Bill of Rights is an Act of the Parliament of England that deals with constitutional matters and sets out certain basic civil rights. This constitution was passed on December 16, 1689.The Bill was passed to declare laws and liberties of the people. Also the people wanted separation of powers and limits the of power to the king and queen. It guarantees the rights of enhancing the democratic election and to get more freedom of speech. No armies should be raised in peacetime, no taxes can be levied, without the authority of parliament. Laws should not be dispensed with, or suspended, without the consent of parliament and no excessive fines should imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. King James the 2nd, had abused his
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” is stated in the United States Constitution as the Second Amendment. Several Americans wish to rid of guns from citizens, disobeying and disrespecting the Constitution. I shot my first gun when I was young and have always been surrounded by them. My neighbor does not leave the house without carrying one, nor does my eighteen year old friend. Never once have I felt unsafe or uneasy knowing that there was a gun close to me. The right to bare arms has become a popular local battle in which some people want to reduce the freedom of one owning firearms while others wish for the
The First Amendment is what we chose because it covers good areas (topics) that are occurring in the world on a daily basis. Many people like the items that The First Amendment covers, and some people don't like them. Either way there are many other amendments that have been ratified by the two-thirds of the House and Senate. There are ten amendments in the constitution, but there are 17 other amendments that aren't in the constitution. Therefore, in total there are 27 amendments.
The first amendment is the cornerstone of our American society founded years ago by our forefathers. Without the first amendment many ideas, beliefs, and groups could not exist today. The first amendment guaranteed the people of the United States the freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, and freedom of petition. Although the first amendment guarantees us, Americans the freedom of speech, we cannot use it to cause others harm. This amendment has helped shaped Americans into what we are today, because of our right to assemble, speak freely, and worship as we please.
We live in the 21st century, where most Americans mind their own business but take for granted our God given rights. Not only God given rights but also those established by our founding forefathers. This paper will illustrate and depict the importance of the original problems faced when adopting the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. It will discuss the importance of the first amendment, the due process of the 4th, 5th, 6th, and the 8th amendments. Last but not least the importance of what is known as the “second Bill of Rights” (14th amendment).
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the States wherein the reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of laws; this brief description is known as the Fourteenth Amendment (Foner A-15).
“When people in the United States are introduced to the concept of socialism - whether in the popular media or in a high school class - they are presented with a simple equation: socialism = a crippled economy that fails to meet people's basic needs + a totalitarian government” (Robertson). Robertson proves a good point in saying this, because generally children in the United States grow up either being taught that socialism is bad or evil, which is completely wrong, or they end up being taught nothing of socialism at all. It is until these children are exposed to a socialist government, through education or experience (which few usually have the privilege of doing) t...
When I was four, my grandpa’s gruff voice inquired “Now Pooh, what direction should the muzzle of that pistol be pointing to?” He taught me all the safety precautions when handling or firing any pistols, shotgun, or assault rifle from my first to the last. Then, on the tenth day of my freshmen year he was put into the ICU and he told me he had cancer. I went up to the hospital to see him, and my grandpa said “Pooh, I do not know how much time I have left, but I want you to get your NRA pistol instructor certification.” In August I told him I would. In October, he passed way and in November, to honor my grandfather’s wishes, I became the youngest NRA certified pistol instructor in the state of Oklahoma.While contemporary liberals fear the power available to a minority of unstable citizens who wreak havoc through gun ownership, the Second Amendment rights must be preserved because we are sworn to protect and serve the United States Constitution as citizens, fight for our freedoms just as the colonists did in the Revolutionary War, and by bearing our firearms freely, letting them ring throughout the United States.
Amendment 1: Freedom of religion, Freedom of practice, Freedom of speech, freedom of the press, Freedom to petition the government, and Freedom to assemble.
The “Bill of rights” had been proposed as a follow up to Parliament’s original Habeas Corpus bill, which safeguarded personal freedom and liberty. Now just about every colony had a bill of rights, so James Madison suggested that if the United States was to survived as a a country it would need to have a set of rules versus thirtheen and every state would have the same rules.
The Bill of Rights was crafted in 1791 by James Madison. It was put in place to protect the rights of all people within the borders of the United States when it is applied by the government. It is a very important document that means a lot in the hearts of Americans.
The philosophy of rights has been a perennial subject of discussion not only because it is embedded in the intellectual tradition and political practices of many countries but also because it exhibits deep divisions of opinion on fundamental matters. Even a cursory survey of the literature on rights since, say, the time of the Second World War would turn up a number of perplexing questions to which widely divergent answers have been given: What are rights? Are rights morally fundamental? Are there any natural rights? Do human rights exist? Are all the things listed in the UN's Universal Declaration (of 1948) truly rights? What are moral rights? Legal rights? Are basic moral rights compatible with utilitarianism? How are rights to be justified? What is the value of rights? Can infants have rights, can fetuses have them, or future generations, or animals? And so on.
Today, more than ever, there is great debate over politics and which economic system works the best. How needs and wants should be allocated, and who should do the allocating, is one of the most highly debated topics in our current society. Be it communist dictators defending a command economy, free market conservatives defending a market economy, or European liberals defending socialism, everyone has an opinion. While all systems have flaws and merits, it must be decided which system is the best for all citizens. When looking at both the financial well being of all citizens, it is clear that market economies fall short on ensuring that the basic needs of all citizens are met. If one looks at liberty and individual freedom, it is evident that command economies tend to oppress their citizens. Therefore, socialism, which allows for basic needs to be met and personal freedoms to be upheld, is the best economic system for all of a country’s citizens.
It has been well settled that freedom of expression is one of the most cherished values of a free democratic society. It is indispensable to the operation of a democratic society whose basic postulate is that the government shall be based on the consent of the governed. But, such a consent implies not only that the consent shall be free but also that it shall be grounded on adequate information, discussion and aided by the widest possible dissemination of information and opinions from diverse and antagonistic sources. The media on reporting and publishing the matter must have ‘fair and accurate’ matter, based on evidence and strong sources. There has been a responsibility given to the media and should be handled accordingly. Freedom of expression which includes freedom of the press has a capacious content and is not restricted to expression of thoughts and ideas which are accepted and acceptable but also to those which offend or shock any section of the population. It also includes the right to receive information and ideas of all kinds from different sources. In essence, the freedom of expression embodies the right to know. However, under our Constitution no right in Part III is absolute. Freedom of expression is not an absolute value under our Constitution. It must not be forgotten that no single value, no matter exalted, can bear the full burden of upholding a democratic system of government. Therefore, understanding that no provision in part III of the constitution is not absolute, it must be understood, that if by implication the ambit of ‘freedom of speech and expression’ has become wider, then similarly, by implication certain ‘prior restraints’ are also applicable, meaning that the media needs to understand its freedom to ...