Behavior Modification

2135 Words5 Pages

Behavior Intervention 1

RUNNING HEAD: Behavior Intervention

Behavioral intervention of a

schoolboy displaying low on-task behavior

in his classroom

Behavior Intervention 2

Abstract

The on-task behavior of a schoolboy aged 11 named Alan was monitored over an

intervention period of 39 days. This period consisted of observation, intervention and

follow-up segments. Target behaviors were defined. These behaviors were then

isolated during the intervention to extricate the functional association of antecedents

and consequences. Previous studies from the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

were referred to for the structure of the intervention model. The theories of

reinforcement and punishment were applied to gain desired behavior and clear target behavior. Verbal positive reinforcement and positive punishment was used, maintaining a firm consistency throughout the intervening period. To achieve the best result a tightly controlled environment was created to limit any possible distractions. Results obtained during the follow-up period indicated a substantial success for the intervention program.

Behavior Intervention 3

Behavioral intervention of a schoolboy displaying low on-task

behavior in his classroom

Behavior assessments are important applications for gaining insight into the motivation of individuals. By conducting these assessments, target behaviors can be defined. After defining these behaviors, functional relationships can be identified. This links the target behavior with antecedents and consequences. Once recognized these antecedents and consequences can be manipulated to influence the target behavior (Ebanks & Fisher, 2003). These behavior assessments work as the foundation for behavior modification therapy.

Antecedents consist of any events that occur immediately before the target behavior manifests. By manipulating the antecedent it is possible to cause the target behavior to become extinct. Similarly the consequences that occur immediately after the target behavior can also be controlled to eliminate the behavior. The combined manipulation of both func...

... middle of paper ...

...ion.

Behavior Intervention 10

References

Ebanks, M. E., & Fisher, W. W. (2003) Altering the timing of academic prompts to

treat destructive behavior maintained by escape. Journal of Applied Behavior

Analysis, 36, 355-359.

Fisher, W. W., Adelinis, J. D., Thompson, R. H., Worsdell, A. S., & Zarcone, J. R.

(1998).Functional analysis and treatment of destructive behavior maintained be

termination of “don’t” (and symmetrical “do”) requests. Journal of Applied

Behavior Analysis, 31, 339-356.

Hapogian, L. P., Toole, L. M., Long, E. S., Bowman E. G., & Lieving, G. A. (2004).

A comparison of dense-to-lean fixed lean schedules of alternative reinforcement

and extinction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 323-337.

Mueller, M. M., Sterling-Turner, H. E., & Scattone, D. (2001) Functional assessment

of hand flapping in a general education classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior

Analysis, 34, 233-236.

Romaniuk, C., Miltenberger, R., Conyers, C., Jenner, N., Jurgens, M.., & Ringenberg,

C. (2002). The influence of activity choice on problem behaviors maintained by

escape versus attention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 349-362.

Open Document