Exploring Collective History in 'White Teeth'

1789 Words4 Pages

Before White Teeth begins its journey in exploring the roots of a specific and collective history through various ideological stances, Zadie Smith opens with a reminder that “What is past is prologue”. The novel’s epigraph, a gravid phrase taken from Shakespeare’s The Tempest, tells us the story about to unfold is an inevitable one, a fated account. Smith’s narrator, from the very start knows this—she knows everything there is to know. She is blunt, bemused, casual and almost shaking their head at the stories she is relaying as if trying her best to elude the true sentiment attached and rooted at its very core. Searching for meaning, Smith’s listless characters bumble about, talking at each other through ideological vagaries and crusades of self-validation—all convenient and performative social veils. White Teeth succeeds in emphasizing these themes with its idiosyncratic narrator and a stylistic use of irony, carefully weaved in the novel’s long sentences, thick paragraphs, often interrupting thoughts and added anecdotes. It is an …show more content…

Smith likes to leave the reader with the possibility of more intrigue to an already verbose tale or anecdote. No explanation (or rather exploration) is left simply explained in full, the reader is given a nugget of something else to think about as well: “So there existed fathers who dealt in the present, who didn’t drag ancient history around like a ball and chain. So there were men who were not neck-deep and sinking in the quagmire of the past” (271). Smith is certainly keen on using metaphor and simile as there will often be two or sometimes three metaphors or similes all packed in a single elongated sentence. “He wanted it to be perfectly quiet and still, like the inside of an empty confessional or the moment in that brain between thought and speech” (4). Simile is Smith’s most used literary device, one used affectively

Open Document