Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Child abusement
Throughout their childhood and adolescent years, Tyron and Aldwin McNeal shared the same violent, terror filled lives. The boys grew up in South Chicago with their mother, Cynthia Taylor, and her husband and the father of Aldwin, Hertie Jones. Jones was commonly abusive to the boy’s mother; he was a heroin addict, alcoholic and a pimp, even going so far as to force Taylor into prostitution. Growing up, the boys were subject to violence in school, exposed to drugs at a very young age, and were even raped by an elder relative whose charge they were left in. During this time, the boys spent a great deal of time together (Tyron was older by only a year). By the age of 12, both Tyron and Aldwin were drinking and smoking marijuana; it was not long before they began dealing drugs. These trends continued throughout the boys years in middle and high school. However, after dropping out of school in their respective junior and senior years, Aldwin and Tyron’s path’s finally parted ways. Sensing a need for order in his life, joined the Army went to serve in Germany. During his time overseas, he met a pastor and was converted to Christianity. After his service, Tyron went on to get married and find work as a deputy in the Lake County Sheriff’s Department. At the same time Aldwin, unlike Tyron, was unable to turn his life around. While Tyron was serving in the military, Aldwin continued his rebellion through a lifestyle of crime, violence, and eventually murder. After serving 7 years out of a 10 year sentence for armed robbery, Aldwin was released from prison in 1993. Soon after his release, Aldwin was involved in a robbery at Maude’s Pizzeria, where he murdered two men: Cory Gerlach and Perry Austin. During this same period he was also accuse... ... middle of paper ... ...if he is sane. Another way to put this is that one is only morally responsible if he is morally conscious. It is very questionable whether Aldwin was aware of right and wrong. While he was in prison, he was diagnosed with antisocial behaviors and paranoid schizophrenia, although there was doubt as to the latter diagnosis. These disorders may have caused Aldwin to be out of touch with reality, casting doubt as to whether he was actually aware of his actions and their moral value. Although, it would take a psychiatrist to determine the extent of this incoherence. However, whether he was guilty or not, Aldwin’s punishment will serve as a warning to others involved in similar crime. According to the soft compatibilist view punishment for moral wrongs can serve to deter others from crime. In essence, punishment will serve as a determining cause for someone else’s reform.
Two people with two completely different characteristics have something alike. Both Dally and Johnny are mentally tough because of their parents. Johnny and Dally’s parents both do not care for them and could care less about them. For example, during Dally’s childhood he went to jail, been in a gang, and has been in many fights and his dad still would not care for him even if he won the lottery. Dally also talks about his dad's disgrace towards him in the car with Johnny and Ponyboy, “‘ Shoot, my dad don’t give a hang whether I’m in jail or dead in a car wreck or drunk in a gutter...’”(88). Dally could easily live without his dad and he does for the most part. Dally just hangs around with his friends and stays at their place. Similarly, Johnny's parents use him like a rag doll to blow off steam, “his father always beating him up”(14). The gang knows what happenes in Johnny’s house. Once Ponyboy was witnessing, “Johnny take a whipping with a two-by-four from his old man”(33). Ponyboy talks about how loud and mean Johnny's mom is and,“you can...
...d few such as Anna, Stella, and Alice who broke free of the poison, lived their lives as Sam Toms’ did who rooted the family. They as he did lied, cheated, manipuled, and kept secrets to try to live a happy life which in actuality their lives were anything but.
Wes (the author) has a family who wants to see him succeed. Although Wes didn’t know his father for long, the two memories he had of him and the endless stories his mother would share with him, helped guide him through the right path. His mother, made one of the biggest effects in Wes’s life when she decided to send him to military story, after seeing he was going down the wrong path. Perhaps, the other Wes’s mother tried her best to make sure he grew up to be a good person, but unfortunately Wes never listen. His brother, Tony was a drug dealer who wish he could go back in time and make the right decisions and he wanted Wes to be different than him. He didn’t want his brother to end up like him and even after he tried everything to keep Wes away from drugs, nothing worked and he gave up. As you can see, both families are very different, Wes (the author) has a family who wants him to have a bright future. Most importantly, a family who responds fast because right after his mother saw him falling down the wrong hill she didn’t hesitate to do something about it. The other Wes isn’t as lucky, as I believe since his mother already had so much pressure over keeping her job and her son Tony being involved in drugs. Same thing with Tony, he was so caught up in his own business that no one payed so much attention to
Children living in this type of environment may feel anger, shame, and sadness. They are forced to take on adult roles much earlier because their parents are irresponsible. For instance it shows this in The Glass Castle because the children are forced to make their own meals and fend for themselves because Rex is too busy drinking and Rose Mary is careless (Walls). Alcoholism takes away children’s childhood by forcing them to take on adult roles. Another example of this is when Billy Deel is forced to take care of himself while his father is passed out and constantly drinking, “Billy had a lot of unsupervised time on his hands” (Walls 82). Billy was greatly affected by his father’s alcohol abuse his personality didn’t maturely develop like other children. This is shown when he sexually assaults Jeanette and doesn’t see anything wrong with it, he yells on page 87 “Guess what? I raped you!” (Walls). This statement proves that parents make a huge impact on children, and when children don’t have that, they suffer. Alcohol abuse is not an individual problem, it affects everyone surrounding that person. It isn’t fair for children to be raised in that environment and government should take greater action to protect the children’s safety by removing them from homes like
It is known that our family is the most important influence on our socialization. As Butterfield explains throughout the first half of his book, the Boskets always dealt with non-promising circumstance and events. These events and circumstances led them to develop and pass down traditions of violence and a lack of trust. One example of this is found on page 143, "Worse it reinforced Willie's belief that the way to settle things was by getting physical." Another example of this is found in how "Laura never knew her father and thus when Butch, was in prison she felt that he had neglected her, similar to the way her father did" (135). Also, Willie's mother taught him to swear at a really young age; Butterfield notes that "he was swearing and committing deviant acts before he even entered school" (138). Through this action one not only sees the distrust passed down but the onset of Labeling theory and how it will haunt Willie his whole life.
...uding the plot, settings, and characters, helped form the good versus evil theme that was evident in the novel. Several good and evil plot events were in the book. The abduction of Michael and Missy was an evil event and the finding of Missy’s mitten and the climax were good events. The novel was also comprised of good and evil settings. The blizzard and Courtney’s large house supported the evil part of the novel. The proximity of Nancy and Courtney’s houses was a good part of the setting. Additionally, the characters played a role in the formation of the theme. Nancy and Ray were good characters as they put their lives at risk for their children. Carl was an evil character because he killed Nancy’s mother as well as his and Nancy’s children. These three elements present in the book helped develop the good vs. evil theme that the novel was primarily based on.
,because offenders has a choice to do right or wrong and the rational choice that a person decides to
The most prominent household that sustained this abusive cycle was the second generation of Trasks—the family that was the primary focus of the novel—where discrimination towards the disfavored child Cal was what urged him to adapt, and take on a callused-like maturity. Cal was illustrated as dark in many aspects;
Al Borlan, ( Richard Karn ) is Tim’s best friend, and also his co-worker on the television show “Tool Time.”
Personally, I believe that the author makes a good case. Depending on some social cues, people's behavior can be quite predictable from selfless to selfish. Most of our legal system leans more on the power of greed and selfishness to mold human behavior when in reality it might do better if the system focused more on conscience. The Jekyll/Hyde syndrome supports my argument, on page 209 of the book it states “there is no difference between the motives and attitudes of criminals, and the motives and attitudes of law-abiding citizens”. Human are expected to follow the rules and act civil even if our self interest tempts us otherwise and if they do not then there is an underlying issue that should be investigated further. Either way, human will
This is relevant as there are utilitarians that rebutted this objection by defining punishment as an infliction of evil on an offender (Primoratz 51). In situations where there is a deliberate decision to “punish” somebody known by the judge to be innocent--that is to an inflict an evil on somebody that, if he were guilty, would be considered punishment, the utilitarian has sufficient grounds to deny this is punishment because the man is not an offender and therefore say this scenario as a consequence of the utilitarian view of punishment (52). Primoratz views this as “poor consolation” as while it might not strictly be a consequence of a utilitarian view of punishment, it is an implication of the ethical consequences of utilitarianism in general, meaning the argument still strikes at fundamental base of utilitarianism, which truly determines whether the doctrine should be taken seriously
whether the punishment fits the crime and if it honors the nature of the moral
The loss of societal values and rules throughout the novel often marks the boys’ gradual descent into savagery and thus, their loss of innocence. In the beginning of the novel, the boys simply play and do as they wish without any parental control; however, they remain tame and overall nonviolent, as those restrictions imposed by
While roaming the hills around an isolated home, a young boy named Henry, displayed rather unusual characteristics associated with his behaviors. What seemed like a cute and innocent boy was nothing but a face of hidden evil. Henry was a very free-spirited and often wild 12 year old boy who enjoyed engaging in daring activities while experiencing adrenaline rushes. His behaviors and curiosities seemed to be limitless, to the point where it brought forth a bit of suspicion. At this age, these types of behaviors may seem “normal” for a young boy like Henry; behaviors that display some hyperactivity, and self-exploration. However, Henry’s attitude and behaviors took a quick turn as his real intentions and motives became ever so clear. Henry is a young boy who grew up in a rather large home, set on top of a hill, overlooking the ocean in the state of Maine. He comes from two loving parents, a mother and father, and has a younger sister who looks up to him. He also had a younger brother named Richard, who died a while back from “accidently” drowning in the bathtub. Despite the tragic loss, he seemed to have a stable family lifestyle.
The moral neutralisation theory was originally developed by Dr Gresham Sykes and his student Dr David matza in 1957 as an expansion of Sutherland’s theory regarding differential association theory in 1947. The idea behind the theory of neutralisation by matza and Sykes was to explain and create a wider understanding of juvenile delinquency. The theory of Moral neutralisation was studied to illustrate neutralisation techniques used by individuals who refuse to conform to social order and chose to participate in crimes, to neutralise the guilt of their acts. Offenders generally tend to neutralise certain values within themselves. This is done so that not abiding the law does not affect their inner self negatively, in order to preserve the good