Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analytical essay of lord of the flies
Analytical essay of lord of the flies
Analytical essay of lord of the flies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analytical essay of lord of the flies
In his novel Lord of the Flies, William Golding depicts childhood as a tumultuous period of time marked by struggle, savagery, and terror, contrary to the common image of inherent innocence. This controversial interpretation serves as a central point for many of the novel’s themes surrounding man’s instincts and behavior. Golding’s interpretation of childhood exposes the role of society in shaping the meaning of innocence and further alludes to the regressive characteristics of war. The loss of societal values and rules throughout the novel often marks the boys’ gradual descent into savagery and thus, their loss of innocence. In the beginning of the novel, the boys simply play and do as they wish without any parental control; however, they remain tame and overall nonviolent, as those restrictions imposed by …show more content…
society still linger. The most prominent example of this is when Roger throws rocks at Henry but aims to miss, as “the protection of parents and school and policemen and the law” surrounded Henry and “Roger’s arm was conditioned by…civilization…” (Golding 62).
Golding implies that Roger’s natural instinct would be to harm the child, an action only restricted because authority figures have made it so. Through the use of discipline and punishment, the boys have been taught to repress violent and wild behavior all of their lives. However, as the memory of parents and the law fades in the children’s minds, they begin to normalize cruelty to one another. For instance, when the hunters support Piggy for reprimanding Jack, it “drove Jack to violence” and “able at last to hit someone” (Golding 71), Jack lets out his anger by punching Piggy. The boys begin to adopt use of physical harm to silence opposition as the level of physical force escalates from a mere punch to murder. Such sinful and violent acts taint the image of naïveté and innocence created by society. Finally, the death of Piggy and the destruction of the conch mark the true loss of authoritative power over the boys. The conch was a
device used to maintain order and rules, and even leading up to his death, Piggy constantly relied on its power and claimed, “I got [sic] the conch!” (Golding 180) before speaking. However, the boys had become savage and disregarded rules of the island or of society as a whole. The boys were freed of any restraints once Roger pushed a rock onto both Piggy and the conch. As the boys chiseled away at their own innocence, they failed to obey the rules imposed on them by a seemingly forgotten society. Though society has conditioned the boys to behave a certain way as to stay controlled and humane, the state of the world outside of the island remains in turmoil as war rages on. In fact, after failing to eradicate the idea of the beast, Ralph desperately asked for a sign from the adult world. Indeed, a sign came “from the battle fought at ten miles’ height” (Golding 95) in the form of a dead parachutist. A product of war helps escalate the problems on the island that stem from growing fear. In this case, the wildness of the boys is only in response to the horrors of civilization’s war against itself. Likewise, at the end of the novel, the naval officer rescues the boys from playing war, but the “trim cruiser in the distance” (Golding 202) indicates return to a different kind of war. The hunting and war on the island, defined by savagery and loose morals, parallels the war of the adults, where war is viewed as a harsh but necessary situation. If savagery is associated with war, then the circumstances that bring about war degenerate society as a whole and show its regression into primitive times. Society has only repressed the natural instinct to hunt and be violent, but one can interpret war as an acceptable manifestation of “mankind’s essential illness” (Golding 89). The violent childhood the boys experience on the island merely parallels the war of the adult world and supports the notion that society is responsible for shaping both the image of innocence and the accepted evil in the world.
Title Sir William Golding has constantly been a man who sees nothing good in anything. He examined the world to be a dreadful place due to the people who has populated the Earth. In order to display how he observes the world which was around the period of the second world war, he came to the decision of producing a novel. His novel was titled “Lord of the flies”. In the novel, William Golding familiarized his audience with three groups of boys; the hunters, the younger children and the gentle boys.
William Golding, the author of the novel The Lord of the Flies, lived through the global conflicts of both world wars. World War II shifted his point of view on humanity, making him realize its inclination toward evilness. His response to the ongoing struggle between faith and denial became Lord of the Flies, in which English schoolboys are left to survive on their own on an uninhabited island after a plane crash. Just like Golding, these boys underwent the trauma of war on a psychological level. Ralph, one of the older boys, stands out as the “chief,” leading the other victims of war in a new world. Without the constraints of government and society, the boys created a culture of their own influenced by their previous background of England.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies portrays the lives of young British boys whose plane crashed on a deserted island and their struggle for survival. The task of survival was challenging for such young boys, while maintaining the civilized orders and humanity they were so accustomed too. These extremely difficult circumstances and the need for survival turned these innocent boys into the most primitive and savaged mankind could imagine. William Golding illustrates man’s capacity for evil, which is revealed in man’s inherent nature. Golding uses characterization, symbolism and style of writing to show man’s inhumanity and evil towards one another.
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The flies’ presents us with a group of English boys who are isolated on a desert island, left to try and retain a civilised society. In this novel Golding manages to display the boys slow descent into savagery as democracy on the island diminishes.
William Golding’s novel ‘The Lord of The Flies’ tells the story of a group of English boys isolated on a desert island, left to attempt to retain civilisation. In the novel, Golding shows one of the boys, Jack, to change significantly. At the beginning of the book, Jack’s character desires power and although he does not immediately get it, he retains the values of civilized behaviour. However, as the story proceeds, his character becomes more savage, leaving behind the values of society. Jack uses fear of the beast to control the other boys and he changes to become the book’s representation of savagery, violence and domination. He is first taken over with an obsession to hunt, which leads to a change in his physical appearance This change of character is significant as he leads the other boys into savagery, representing Golding’s views of there being a bad and unforgiving nature to every human.
Throughout the novel, Lord of the Flies the major theme shown throughout is innocence. For the duration of the novel the young boys progress from innocent, well behaved children longing fir rescue to bloodthirsty savages who eventually lose desire to return to civilisation. The painted bloodthirsty savages towards the end of the novel, who have tortured and killed animals and even their friends are a far cry from the sincere children portrayed at the beginning of the novel. Golding portrays this loss of innocence as a result of their naturally increasing opened to the innate evil that exists within all human beings. “There isn’t anyone to help you. Only me. And I’m the Beast. . . . Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill! . . . You knew, didn’t you? I’m par...
Golding has a rather pessimistic view of humanity having selfishness, impulsiveness and violence within, shown in his dark yet allegorical novel Lord of the Flies. Throughout the novel, the boys show great self-concern, act rashly, and pummel beasts, boys and bacon. The delicate facade of society is easily toppled by man's true beastly nature.
As much as everyone would like to believe that all people are inherently good, the illusion of innocence that is often presumed throughout childhood makes the revelation of human nature especially hard to bear. Arthur Koestler said, “Nothing is more sad than the death of an illusion”, and this one is certainly a very hard reality to cope with. In the novel Lord of the Flies, the author William Golding tells the story of a group of British schoolboys who crash land on an uninhabited island in the midst of a world war, and how they regress from civilization to savagery. By conveying Ralph’s reactions to the deaths of Simon and Piggy, providing detailed, symbolic imagery of the cliffs and the lagoon, and showing Ralph’s despair at his new understanding
Although there are many interpretations of Golding’s Lord of the Flies, one of the most important is one that involves an examination of Freudian ideas. The main characters personify Sigmund Freud’s theory of the divisions of the human mind; thus, Jack, Ralph, Piggy and Simon are metaphors for the id, ego, and the super-ego of Freudian psychology, respectively. The inclusion of psychological concepts in this literary work distinguish it as a commentary on human nature, beyond labels of “adventure” or “coming of age” novel. Many readers are left in shock upon reading Golding’s masterpiece because of the children’s loss of innocence, but most fail to consider
“Adults run the world; and there is war, and enmity, and destruction unending.” (Peter David) Throughout the novel, the boys in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies consistently admire the life of adults. Ironically, Golding’s imaginary island is a microcosm of the adult world- both destined to be destroyed. Golding reveals this microcosm through conflict and characterization.
The first is Roger and his actions. Throughout the book, as morals break down, the children’s behavior becomes more savage and evil by human standards. In the beginning, William Golding had already introduced Roger as an inherently evil boy, but with his actions still controlled by a mental barrier of right and wrong behavior. As a littlun sits in the sand and plays, Roger begins to throw rocks at him, but purposefully misses each time. Roger missing is not something of conscious decision, as it can be read in the passage, but rather stems from his subconscious moral compass that was built by society. It seems here the contention of Roger’s evil has been lost because he failed to perform an evil action because of a subconscious barrier, but this subconscious barrier was constructed by society, by school, and by the adults who have taught them boys about ethical behavior. Therefore, it can be expected that once these children are away from society for long enough, these barriers would break down because they aren’t inherent to their nature, and prompt them to do evil things. Roger demonstrates this. When Jack breaks off from the original group led by Ralph and his forms a tribe of savagery, it represents the boys breaking off from society and entering the human “state of nature”. Roger’s actions at this point in the plot become sinister and perverse. In Chapter 8, “Roger [begins] to withdraw his spear and [the] boys [notice] it for the first time. Robert [stabilizes] the thing in a phrase which [is] received uproariously. “Right up her ass!””(195). Roger is also the boy who leads the murder of Piggy. He begins with dropping stones onto a catapult. Eventually, as Piggy shouts, “Roger, with a sense of delirious abandonment, [leans] all his weight on the lever” and launches the rock into cracking his skull and killing him (260). Through
William Golding's Lord of the Flies is a carefully constructed fable that was, in Golding's words, "an attempt to trace the defects of society back to the defects of human nature." (Grigson 189). The novel shows a group of English boys reverting to savagery on a Pacific island. The book deals with the conflict between humanity's inner barbarism on one side, and the civilizing influence of reason on the other.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies shows man’s inhumanity to man. This novel shows readers good vs. evil through children. It uses their way of coping with being stranded on an island to show us how corrupt humans really are.
In the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding, the representation of childhood as times of tribulation and terror along with the community accepted portrayal of innocence shapes the theme of civilization vs savagery.
Lord of the Flies by William Golding paints a graphic tale of the horrific acts of savagery committed by a group of boys abandoned on an island. While diving further into the novel the reader begins to realize that the acts of the boys are not far from the crimes of mankind. In Lord of the Flies, Golding uses Irony and characterization to illustrate that despite advancements in technology, war is still nothing more than the primal savagery of man.