Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Franz ferdinand assassination small essay
Franz ferdinand assassination small essay
The assassination of franz ferdinand
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Franz ferdinand assassination small essay
The people of Austria were rightfully upset in the summer of 1914. Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been shot and killed on June 28th, supposedly by a Serbian, and the Austrian government was livid. Three weeks after the assassination, on July 21st, Austria’s ambassador to Serbia, Baron von Giesl, wrote to foreign minister Leopold von Berchtold expressing that Serbia could no longer be avoided. Serbia had been seen as a threat long before the assassination, but now things seemed to have gotten out of hand. Giesl used his fears and beliefs to form an opinion that, in his opinion, should represent the entity of Austrian officials and influence the country to wage war on Serbia.
In his letter to Berchtold, Giesl expressed the desire of using the assassination as a “pretext to crush Serbia”. He stressed the importance of confronting Serbia when they least expect it, since Austria-Hungary is “now seen as powerless to Serbians”. Baron von Giesl is an imperial man, who potentially sees the threat of Serbia differently than the rest of Austria-Hungary. Giesl believes Serbia is attempting to fulfill the vision of the Great-Serbian Empire relatively soon and that Austria must prevent this from happening. Thanks to the assassination, fulfilling the vision of the Great Serbian Empire by crumbling the Austrian Empire would be
From Baron von Giesl’s point of view, the only way to make things turn in favor of Austria-Hungary was to attack Serbia while they were too busy putting Austria down. The letter that Giesl wrote to Berchtold provides an important look into what Austrian officials were thinking right before the start of World War I. Whether or not the assumption that Serbia was a threat that only war could eliminate was a widespread belief throughout Austria-Hungary, it ultimately led the Austrian officials to decide it was the correct
Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1896. He was a threat to the Black Hand Terrorist group, a group of radical Serbian nationalists. They pledged “to destabilize the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the Ottoman Empire in order to incorporate their Serb population into a greater Serbia” (CITE) However the Archduke’s goals were “strengthening the Austro-Hungarian Empire” (CITE) which was contrary to the Serbs' desires. They feared that if he came into power, he would continue to persecute the Serbs, henceforth the decision to assassinate him.
He felt that several forces of opposing countries took part in fighting each battle and ultimately believed that global opposition caused the Great War. Similarly, in the Balkan Region, several ethnic minorities desired independence from Austria-Hungary. As shown in Document 3, the Austro-Hungarian government demanded that action be taken regarding propaganda against Austria-Hungary. This ultimatum was a result of the assassination of Archduke Francis Ferdinand, who was killed by a Serbian nationalist. Russia, a large Slavic nation, has close ties with Serbia.
On June 28, 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria visited the Bosnian capital, Sarajevo. A group of six assassins, supplied by a Bosnian based terrorist group the Black Hand, had gathered on the streets where the Archduke's motorcade would pass. Some attempted to kill the Archduke, including one who attempted to throw a grenade at the car but missed. Others failed to act as the car drove past them. Later on the route through the city, the motorcade took a wrong turn onto a previously designated street. Gavrilo Princip, a Black Hand assassin, stood waiting with a pistol. Princip shot and killed Archduke Ferdinand and his wife Sophie. However, the assassination received almost disregard back in Austria. Yet, the death of the Archduke and his wife would be the beginning of an all out war in Europe as Austria-Hungary would declare war on Serbia. This declaration would bring in Germany on the side of Austria-Hungarian empire and Russia aiding the Serbians. By joining sides this would convey in France, Great Britain and during the later part of the war, Italy, Japan and the United States. Official war began on July 28, 1914.
2. Germany encouraged Austria-Hungary to start a war with Serbia, and continued to do so, even when it seemed clear that such a war could not be localized.
In order to understand most of the events that took place in the novel it is essential to understand how the war erupted. After Serbia refused to apologize to Austria for the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, Germany pushed Austria to declare war. Germany’s desire to start a war can be explained by the internal tensions that were increasing in the country at the time. The assassination was a timely scapegoat to direct the peoples attention and animosity to external sources. In short, on July 28, 1914, Austria declared war on Serbia and the allies of each country joined in, starting this global war.
Balkan nationalism was a major factor in the outbreak of the WWI .It is one of the long-term causes which caused European powers to declare war to each other. Even if the war between Austria and Serbia was expected to be a short one it culminated into a worldwide conflict that lasted four years. The idea of Pan-Slavism was the result of Serbian’s nationalism and Serbia refused to be oppressed by Austria-Hungary. Serbs demanded for rights of self-governance and unified state. However their neighbor Austria-Hungary wanted to become imperial power and she implied territorial expansion. Historians have different opinions about this subject and because of its complexity it is not possible to say that none of them is completely right. Balkan countries were a big threat for her foreign policy and this led to the culmination of their conflict and the outbreak of the war. Although nationalism is important in understanding the outbreak of WWI, there are many underlying causes that together culminated into a worldwide conflict. It is hard to reach the final answer on the question which relates to the extent of the importance of Balkan nationalism in the outbreak of the war because there are many different perspectives in understanding this question. For example Ruth Henig’s opinion is that Balkan nationalism was extremely important for the war and sees the guilt of Austria-Hungary for its outbreak. On the other hand John Leslie says that the responsible is Germany :“Austria-Hungary can be held responsible for planning a local Austro-Serb conflict, which was linked to its fears about Balkan nationalism, but Germany, which was not interested in this quarrel, quite deliberately used it as an opportunity to launch the European war which Austria-...
Hence the blank cheque to Austria. Austria-Hungry looked for no other possibility but war to solve the problem because of their short sighted plan to rid themselves of a Slavic Nationalist movement Conclusion: § Conclude that three long term factors contributed to war, failure of triple entente to accommodate Germany as a dominant power, instead allowing them to feel threatened, hence the naval and arms race progressed. Austria Hungary and Russia could not resolve Balkan conflict peacefully; Germany's backing of this making a small local war a world war. Attitude in the time, Nationalism, no country backing down, notably Germany. Austria Hungary looked for no other possibility but war to rid themselves of a Slavic Nationalist Movement.
In the late 1980s through the 1990s, the republics of the former Yugoslavia experienced serious ethnic tensions, escalating into all-out war which resulted in some of the worst war crimes committed in Europe since World War II. In 1993, the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia was formed with the goal of punishing perpetrators who carried out acts of genocide and crimes against humanity in the wars in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina and to prevent any such atrocities from ever occurring again. One of the most significant and high-profile trials of this tribunal was that of Slobodan Milosevic, the former president of both Serbia and the former Yugoslavia, who was accused of committing crimes against humanity, war crimes, and abuses of power and corruption. Milosevic died in 2006, and his trial was never concluded. Whether or not he would have been convicted of these crimes is a subject of debate.
THESIS STATEMENT: The assassination of Julius Caesar was due to his increased power and the Senate's fear of losing their political relevance. PURPOSE STATEMENT: Through critical analysis and research, it has been shown that Caesar's gain in power worried the Senate. INTRODUCTION: On July 13, 100 B.C., Gaius Julius Caesar was born into a family that was proud of being patrician.
According to source E, the structure of the Habsburg Monarchy, the Austrian governing system, made it difficult, “…to retreat…[or] to delay, once the decision had been made, ill-defined and unsatisfactory as the decision was.” Austria-Hungary’s inability to revoke decisions, led to the diplomatic mishaps of the July Crisis, a diplomatic crisis in the summer of 1914 that led to World War I. After the ultimatum was issued to Serbia, Austria-Hungary’s government would have difficulty controlling the actions that followed. According to source D, the ultimatum demanded, “…a formal assurance that they [Serbia] condemn this dangerous propaganda against the [Austrian] monarchy.” However, according to source C, “…[Serbia] could… do little to stop the activities of the anti-Austrian society, the Black Hand.” Regardless of Serbia’s response, Austria-Hungary would have difficulty reversing the decisions made. Ultimately, the inability of the Austrian governing system to control actions made in times of war, was partially responsible for the start of World War
In the July Crisis Austria-Hungary blamed Serbia for the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand (the heir to the throne of the Austro-Hungarian Empire) despite not having conclusive proof. Austria-Hungary asked for German support to "eliminate Serbia as a power factor in the Balkans". Germany agreed, offering her full support for Austria- Hungary to start a war with Serbia, and this became known as the "blank cheque". Austria-Hungary and Germany could not have failed to realise the possibility of Russian intervention and a European war, suggesting to me that war was their objective. Austria-Hungary issued an impossible ultimatum to Serbia, which was likely to provoke a war. Serbia was given only 48 hours to reply, so was forced to think quickly, or other countries would be mobilized and ready to attack. Serbia accepted all but one point of the ultimatum. Consequently war was announced. If given more time Serbia could have discussed the issue further in a conference. The British foreign minister, Grey suggested a conference, but this was rejected by Germany and Austria-Hungary, suggesting that they had deliberate aims for war during the Balkan Crisis, rather than the Balkan Crisis being mismanaged.
The Assassination Bureau, where men, philosophers have taken control of society basing off moral actions. And the consequence? An execution that was proven socially justifiable. The book, published on November 22, 1963, features the chief of the Assassination Bureau, Ivan Dragomiloff, a Russian man who runs away from his country’s War conflicts under another man’s identity with his infant daughter at the time. A Russian importing house of S. Constantine & Co. in New York, the identity he had stolen years ago. He came into this country thinking the Assassination Bureau was right “and stung by the charge that we Russians were thinkers, not doers, I organized it.” Ivan Dragomiloff being the philosopher and humanist made sure his Assassination
unable to gain a political position in the Forum, he went to Rhodes to study
After years of hostility and aggression between the European superpowers and large states, the balance of power began to be challenged. The Serbians in 1914 assassinated the Arch-duke, Franz Ferdinand, of Austria-Hungary. The country counteracted and “issued an ultimatum to Serbia, which would bring the assassins to justice. And with that action Serbia’s sovereignty was nullified” (Duffy Michael, 2009). Since Serbia did not succumb to the harsh demands of Austria-Hungary, “preventative” war was declared on Serbia on July 28,...
He was under a great deal of stress and wished to contain the crisis as quickly as possible. His conciliatory actions, however, were futile as less than one month prior to his correspondence with the Kaiser, Wilhelm had already pledged full alliance to Austria – Hungary and by no means was willing to risk losing a valuable ally. Wilhelm’s telegram in reply to Nicholas’ differed greatly in demeanour. In his telegram, he wrote that the “unscrupulous agitation…in Serbia…has resulted in the outrageous crime, to which Archduke Francis Ferdinand fell a victim”, giving the impression of the severity of Serbia’s actions and highlighting Serbia’s dissatisfaction towards Austria-Hungary. He strongly believed that “all persons morally responsible for the dastardly murder should receive their deserved punishment” inferring that his actions from there on would not be conciliatory. From the outset, both leaders seemed to have a different agenda; Nicholas pleading to keep the peace, whereas Wilhelm more interested in advocating an attack on Serbia for their heinous