Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature review topic essay
Literary analysis text
Literary analysis text
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Befkadu Meshesha
9 September 2014
English 120
Section 50408
Literary Research Paper
Conflicts in the Short Story “Barn Burning”
Making the right choice is not always easy. Sometimes the choices are equally important or choosing one may come with irreversible consequences. The conflict in the short story “Barn Burning” by William Faulkner is very challenging. The conflict that the main character in the story, Sartorius Snopes (Sarty) goes through, is more than a simple moral dilemma. As he was standing in the court before the judge, he was battling with the idea of who he is and what he must do. At a young age he is forced to make a hard choice. Sarty knows that his father, Abner, is guilty; however, there was no evidence to convict him except
…show more content…
Abner’s anger and Sarty’s moral dilemma were not resolved.
After they settled in the new town, Abner got back into his old habit of instigating problems with the Snopes family. Abner’s view of the landowner, Major DeSpain, is very contemptuous. In contrast, Sarty’s view of the new environment seems very optimistic, and he was ready to start life afresh.
Getting away from the first crime did not teach Abner a lesson, and he decided to destroy DeSpain’s rug on purpose. The only lesson he learned was that Sarty might not be onboard with his crime. Abner’s self-destructive behavior started coming to the surface when Major DeSpain asked Abner to fix the rug. He decided to ruin the rug even more. After seeing the rug, DeSpain decided to get compensation instead. This escalated the situation, and as a result, Abner decided to sue DeSpain.
The court hearing experience brings Sarty a lot of painful memories. The conflict worsens and tensions start to develop. Abner did not agree with the verdict, and he did not want to pay DeSpain any compensation. Instead he decided to burn DeSpain’s
…show more content…
"Go." …(Faulkner 198).
This is more than Sarty’s conscious can handle.
Sometimes the question of doing right and following our conscience comes with great consequences and a moral dilemma. This dilemma sometimes brings the option to run away and never look back. Faced with this type of dilemma, we all come to the point where running away from making this decision is the best solution because either choice is agonizingly painful. Sarty was faced with this third option as he was running to the market to buy oil for his father so that he could burn the DeSpain barn.
Sarty thinking in his heart “…. I could keep on, he thought. I could run on and on and never look back, never need to see his face again. Only I can't. I can't, the rusted can in his hand now, the liquid sploshing in it as he ran back to the house and into it, into the sound of his mother's weeping in the next room, and handed the can to his father…”
(Faulkner 2).
Running away is not the solution when a person is faced with two undesirable choices. As Sarty was covered in oil, which would make him an accomplice to the crime about to happen, his conscience caused him to make a difficult decision that changed his life
When described as stiff, we see Abner’s abruptness and coldness towards his family as well as others in his community. Abner’s authorative figure makes his coldness more threatening and his patriarchal figure puts more force into his coldness. Faulkner portrays him as wolf-like and without heat as well; this description shows us that Abner is not only cunning in his crime, but also emotionless when committing the crime. For example, when burning barns, he dispassionately watches the barns burn down.
At first glance, the story “Barn burning” seems just to be about a tyrannical father and a son who is in the grips of that tyranny. I think Faulkner explores at least one important philosophical question in this story were he asks at what point should a person make a choice between what his parent(s) and / or family believes and his own values?
The main character, Abner Snopes, sharecrops to make a living for his family. He despises wealthy people. Out of resentment for wealthy people, he burns their barns to get revenge. Abner’s character over the course of the story is unchanging in that he is cold hearted, lawless, and violent.
In a young boy’s life, making the morally right choice can be difficult especially when the choice goes against someone that is suppose to be respected, such as a parent. “Barn Burning” by William Faulkner is a coming of age story about a son of a poor and evil sharecropper. Showing the difference between good and evil, Faulkner uses character descriptions and plot, revealing Sarty’s struggles’s as he chooses between making the morally right decision or to be loyal to a dishonest father.
Sarty spent his entire life hiding behind the unspoken rule that blood is thicker than water. But, in the face of having to decide whether he should continue to overlook Abner’s amoral behavior, he chooses not to. Even though he tries to understand Abner’s reasoning, in his heart he cannot condone it. In a situation where Sarty-the child would be frightened to stand up against his father, Sarty-the man is not. It is unfortunate that he had to lose a father in order to regain his sense of morality, but in light of the situation he was in, it can be agreed, that he is better off.
The first half of To Kill A Mockingbird contains many classic dilemmas that serve as models for more important problems later to come. For example, Atticus is forced into a choice between disobeying Scout's teacher and doing what he feels is right for Scout. Atticus wants Scout to retain her respect for the teacher and to continue following her instructions. Yet, he knows that the time he shares with his daughter is very important and is something that will h...
The cruel dominance of a father, can extinguish any flame of hope that builds in the people around him. In William Faulkner's short story "Barn Burning," Abner is that father. The story portrays a nomadic life of a family driven from one home to another. Abner had a craving hunger to belittle those around him that thought they were "better than him." Although the family accepts the nomadic life, Sarty (the son) dreams of having peace and stability. To have this peace, it only requires a lack of conflict. The Snope family was doomed to struggle due to Abner's constant instigation of conflict, the ongoing domination of his family and his complete lack of respect for the law.
In ¡§Barn Burning¡¨, Sarty¡¦s father enjoys setting fires to burn down others¡¦ properties. Sarty faces the problem between loyalty and honesty. On one hand, he wants to be loyal to his father; on the other hand, he does not endorse his father¡¦s behavior. His father teaches him: ¡§You¡¦re getting to be a man. You got to learn. You got to learn to stick to your own blood or you ain¡¦t going to have any blood to stick to you¡¨ (¡§Barn Burning¡¨, 8). His father wa...
Sarty has moved twelve times in his ten years of age and although the story does not state clearly, that this is not the first time his father has set fire to a barn, but shows that the chances are, that he probably has done this in the past which has affected Sarty in how he feels about his father. Sarty’s other family members include the mother, aunt, an older brother, and two twin sisters who are minor contributing factors in this story. The family knows the father is responsible for the burning of the barns and they even unwillingly help him at his requests. This story describes the family somewhat concerned for the father, but they never challenge his decision to burn the barns even though it is wrong.
He is in the court room as a witness to a barn burning. The judge can only pardon Abner
In the story “Barns Burning” Abner Snopes, the father is accused of burning a neighbor’s barn. Sarty is faced with a decision that will shape the rest of his life. Sarty is called to the stand, but because the plaintiff is ultimately unwilling to force him to testify against his own father, the case is closed, and the father is advised to leave that part of the country. As the family Sarty,
William Faulkner is concerned with the south and its problems with black slavery. The issues in Barn Burning deal with the conflict between father and son. The theme of this story focuses on justice. The boy, Sarty, objects to his father burning barns and wants people to be treated fairly. His father, Abner, believes his son should respect and support kin. Abner thinks family is right no matter what. Faulkner’s intent is to show that choosing between one’s own family and justice is very difficult to do, and in the end justice must prevail. The theme is best illustrated by its point of view, its characterization, and setting.
Sarty is only ten years old, but growing up fast. In “Barn Burning” by William Faulkner, Sarty is estranged as he struggles between obedience to his arsonist father, Abner, and his developing sense of integrity. The internal struggle is evident early in the story, when he is brought before a local Justice of the Peace to be questioned in the case of his father burning a neighbor’s barn. In the moments before he is to be questioned, he knows that his father expects him to lie on his behalf which makes him feel “frantic grief and despair” (Faulkner 801). Sarty can say nothing, and the case results in Abner being told to leave town. Abner knows that Sarty was struggling with the truth, and later that evening forewarns him, “You got to learn to stick to your own blood or you ain’t going to have any blood to stick to you” (803). Shortly after they arrive at their new home, Abner takes Sarty with him to go meet the plantation owner, Major. Sarty feels a “surge of peace and joy”() as he arrives at the beautiful home, like he is safe and nothing bad can happen. However, his father deliberately soils an expensive carpet when they enter the home and makes spiteful comments. Sarty doesn’t comment on the incident, but the stark contract between their reactions to the Major’s home reinforces the alienation between them. Sarty continues to hope that this will be a fresh start for his family and his father will change his ways, while Abner escalates the tension with the property owner over the carpet to the point he decides to burn down the Major’s barn. As Abner begins to make preparations, he tells Sarty’s mother to hold Sarty, because he knows the boy will go and warn the Major. In the heat of the moment, S...
...an adult, his articulation of this southern code of morality is coherent and well thought out while Sarty’s reaction to his father’s incendiary behaviour is instinctive and not intellectualized. The image of the violent Southern man is evident in both stories, both boys have fathers who have participated in violence-Abner Snopes has a seething rage which finds satisfaction only through burning the property of people he hates and John Sartoris has been directly involved in the war, has a belligerent disposition and resorts to bloodshed frequently in the novel. But the difference lies in the ultimate response of the central character of each story to the southern ideals of masculinity - Bayard initially abides by but ultimately distances himself from Southern codes of honour while Sarty, being a child, is still far from finding himself at the end of “Barn Burning”.
In the story, “Barn Burning”, William Faulkner has displayed the complex situation for the young boy, Sarty, who is just ten years of old. In his young age he has to through many challenges and dilemma. Children are innocent and have a pure heart. But in case of Sarty, he has to be manipulative and lie for the sake of family. He was in a dilemma to distinguish what is right and wrong. To be with family and tell a lie as his father said or be truthful, was his major dilemma. As for a child reasoning capacity is not yet developed properly, he followed his father path in spite of some reluctance. Every time he has to go through this dilemma because of his father’s immoral act. He was broken and lost his faith on his father when he asked him to