The Similarities Between Banks And Building Societies

1236 Words3 Pages

Even though “now” banks and building societies look much alike, they used to be completely different types of financial institutions. For this reason, I will point out the differences and similarities as we go along the historical process through which these two, once utterly distinct, types of financial institutions started to look the same.
First of all, we need to stress the main difference which distinguishes banks from building societies, and that is their ownership structure. Banks are private limited companies(p.l.c) whilst building societies are mutual organizations. Banks are profit oriented companies and they are usually listed on the stock market. This means that people and other companies can buy shares in banks. The shareholders …show more content…

As a consequence there was little to none competition between these two types of financial institutions as they offered different services and had opposite objectives. There was also little competition within a particular financial market as both banks and building societies operated cartels which set interest rates. The Bank of England used to set the limits for the interest rates of banks up to the 1971 when they were removed to increase the competition among banks, whilst the Building Societies Association (BSA) recommended the rates for the …show more content…

With this new legislation, the Building Societies are eventually allowed to undertake new business areas and they can finally offer the same services as for the banks. Thus they can offer banking services such as foreign currency services, credit cards, “limited” unsecured lending, money transmission. They can also offer investment services like banks, such as providing investment advice, operating stockbroking services, pension funds and they can also provide insurance as well. Moreover building societies, like banks, were finally granted access to the wholesale money market. But there are some still some differences between banks and Building Societies. Building societies, by law, are allowed to borrow only up to 50% of their total funding from the wholesale market. The average amount societies fund themselves from the money markets is around 30%. Banks are not constrained in the same way. For example, in 2007 the Northern Rock bank had taken this ratio of borrowing to 75%. It faced collapse when the amount of credit available in the money markets dried up. (The Economist, 2014) Building societies are also required to have at least 75 per cent of their lending secured against residential

Open Document