Compare translation:
In 4:1, King James Version uses the phrase “gotten a man from Lord” while New English Translation 2 uses the phrase “create a man just as Lord did”. These two phrases are different in meaning. King James Version suggests that Lord gave Eve a man, while NET2 implies that Eve claims she has the power of God. In the Hebrew text, the original word is to get, acquire, create, possess.
Another translation comparison is 4:11, in NET2 version, the word “banish” is used, why in KJV, they use “curse” to describe Cain’s punishment. In Hebrew, the original word is to curse. If using the word “curse”, the commentary stated there were two possible meanings: either his curse is worse than the ground, or his curse would separate him from the ground. The word “banish” would only lead us to the
…show more content…
The commentator also thinks that it represents a new start. It also fits in the Primeval History, mentioning about the genealogical information of Adam and Eve.
Detailed with the passage
Abel’s character was portrayed to be more favorable to God than Cain. One of the indications is that his profession was given before Cain, in addition to his offering was accepted. Moreover, Abel and Cain’s relationship is likely the cause of the murders, not because Cain’s offering was rejected.
Cain’s character is conflicting. After he was punished, he decided to go away from God. The course pack suggests that it is because he does not believe in God and refuses to accept God’s verdict. God’s assurance that he would be avenged does not satisfy Cain, giving one of the possible reasons why Cain leaves God. Therefore, Cain’s building a city shows his continued rebellion against God. However, the course pack stated that “the East” would typically mean the road to take when obeying God. It looks like Cain is a rebellion child who wants to leave the house, but also, he wants to see his parents
For the killing of Abel the Eternal Lord had exacted a price: Cain got no good from committing that murder because the Almighty
The biblical story of Cain and Abel has been written in more than one way. The King James version of the Bible states that when God speaks to Cain after he had murdered his brother Abel, God said, "Thou shalt" overcome sin. In the standard American version of the Bible, God says "Do thou" which means Cain will certainly overcome sin. The Hebrew word 'timshel' means 'thou mayest' which is arguably the most important two words in John Steinbeck's novel East of Eden. These two words change the meaning of what God said completely. 'Thou mayest' gives a person the gift of free will. It is not a promise or an order that people will overcome sin, timshel means that people are responsible for their own actions and decisions. It is the thoughts and actions of a person that determine how God will judge them, not fate or destiny. Three characters that portray the meaning of timshel are: Adam Trask, Cathy/Kate and Cal Trask. East of Eden supports the meaning for the Hebrew word 'timshel' through the actions of the diverse characters by giving them all the freedom of choice to decide between good and evil.
An allusion to the Biblical story of Adam and Eve's descendents, Cain and Abel continued the progression of man's shift from leavers, to what they are now, takers. The taker philosophy that "the world was made for man" (61), epitomized the their obstinate attitude that the universe was meant to be conquered and exploited by humans.
John Steinbeck frequently expresses his idea of a reoccurring cycle between the struggles of good and evil. It seems fairly apparent that Steinbeck had passed the persistent loop of Cain and Abel’s story from Charles and Adam onto the next generation of brothers, Caleb and Aron Trask. In order to sustain his continuous biblical allusions, Steinbeck uses the metaphor of the man who was “smart as Satan.” This allows for a reestablished pattern of the biblical story, Cain and Abel. By doing so, Steinbeck effectively adds a new element towards his predetermined design of the novel.
Grendel is the spawn of the greatest sin in the Anglo-Saxon era -- fratricide. Fratricide is the slaying of one's own brother. Cain was cursed by God, forced to have hardship in tilling the soil and was given a mark on his head. God's wrath would not allow Cain to abandon his sin, by death, and his curse carried on throughout the life of mankind. To read the complete story of Cain and his brother Abel, click here The sin of fratricide did not only mean blood-related family, but applied to the murder of kinsmen.
Symbolism is very prominent over the course of this story, giving it that much more meaning. Knowles makes not only one, but several instances to religious principles and more precisely in this case, Adam and Eve. These of jealousy, greed, and selfishness are prominent throughout both stories as well is a significant fall whether it would be as monstrous as humanity or on the smaller scale of relationships. The disruption of peace and harmony are also evident in the two. In addition, it is interesting how the author finds a way to tie them all into each other.
story from ancient literature-it is an allusion of the well-known story of Cain and Abel in the Bible.
...nt in both style and content. Where Genesis I portrays a creation in which an omnipotent God forms order from chaos and places mankind at the center of this new world, Genesis II delves deeper into the roles and origins of man and woman and their reason for existence. This juxtaposition of simple story and deeper meaning further illustrate the Hebrew culture's societal evolution and its conscious shift to a patriarchal system - a parallel transition from chaos to order.
The God of Genesis is portrayed very differently. God is a forgiving God. One sees this when God states, "of the tree of knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it you shall die" (Genesis 2:17). However, when Adam and Eve do eat the apple-though he does make them mortal-God allows them to live. God also does not strike down Cain. The God of Genesis is also a personable God. God talks directly to the h...
For the eternal Lord avenged the killing of Abel. He took no delight in that feud, but banished Cain from humanity because of his crime. From Cain were hatched all evil progenies: ogres, hobgoblins, and monsters, not to mention the giants who fought so long against God - for which they suffered due retribution. (Beowulf, 29)
There came a day when Cain and Abel both went to make an offering unto Jehovah; Abel made an offering from his flocks while Cain made an offering from the first fruits of his harvest. Cain’s offering was rejected by Jehovah, Cain became jealous of Abel and his favor with Jehovah. In a jealous rage Cain slew Abel.
In the quest for the original wording of the Bible you have to look at all of the texts and their background. Their are many versions: Revised Standard, The New English Bible, The New International Bible, New American Bible, and the King James Version. All have different ways of saying the same scripture. This is the beginning of the textual criticism portion of biblical exegesis. In my own personal opinion I have found that the K...
Perhaps God lets these boys suffer because their family line is unclean, full of sin, and without the sacrifice of the Christ. This brings us to another theme that appears in this passage; the idea of blood sacrifices. Some scholars believe that Cain’s gift to God simply wasn’t good enough because it wasn’t a blood sacrifice like Abel’s. The idea of blood as important to God is prevalent in Scripture, from this first mention of Cain’s sheep (Genesis 4:4), to Abraham’s offering of Isaac (Genesis 22), to the idea of women’s menstruation making her unclean (Leviticus 15:19-30). God even claims that Cain’s blood is crying out to Him from the ground (Genesis 4:10).
The rule of Biblical interpretation that has been broke here is that no doctrine is to entirely be based off one passage of Scripture from the Bible. Along with that no verse or phrase can or should be allowed to have a meaning when isolated that it would not have if it was kept in its original context.