Bananarama Controversy

485 Words1 Page

Bananarama, it is all a propaganda. Peel it from the top, you’ll be chop. Peel it from the bottom, you’ll be the new joker of Gotham.

This nonsense debate viciously appears every time you are enjoying a banana. Whether you are in a classroom, elevator, or restroom, everybody starts criticising you as if they are Simon Cowell for Banana Got Talent.

It is bananas how after years of Evolution, we still argue how to peel a banana. But we can stop this issue by simply peeling from the bottom of a banana (non-stem).

Now, why is it that people peel at the top of the banana (stem)? An issue with peeling the top is that it requires a lot of energy to snap the stem. Not everyone can break off the stem on the first try and I am those few people. The multiple tries of snapping the stem result to mushed parts and bruises at the top of the banana. And we all know that unattractive banana is a huge turnoff. Nutritionist Shona Wilkinson even explained how bruised banana “does make a [banana] more susceptible to infection.” (Slate) In other words, we are likely to ditch the banana if it looks ugly. Sorry banana… but it is a swipe left for you. …show more content…

Due to the power of genetic modification, cavendish bananas have hard stems to resist natural disasters (The Conversation), which is also a huge issue to anyone who peels the banana from the top (stem). Then we have the monkeys who have been systematic in peeling bananas. Being that it’s their main diet, monkeys peel their banana from the bottom, since they want to peel where there is less

More about Bananarama Controversy

Open Document