99 Homes is an upcoming thriller dedicated to Roger Ebert and directed by Rahmin Bahrani and it does not dissapoint. This film tells the story of single father Dennis Nash, portrayed beautifully by Andrew Garfield, who is down on his luck and gets evicted from his home due to the lack of work in construction. However the story is not as simple as it seems with Bahrani trying to expose the underbelly of the real estate business. Nash must then make a deal with the devil and work for the same man who evicted him, the callous Rick Carver, who is played by Michael Shannon, in an attempt to get his home back and then some. Nash is then forced to do Carver's legal and illegal dirtywork and evict other people from their homes though in the process must maintain his humanity, a word that Carver would never know the meaning of. It's a battle between his conscious and his survival that does not give you give you a minute to relax for the 112 minutes of the film. Bahrani does an incredible job creating some of the most intense sequences that I have seen in the past couple of years. In fact, certain sequences of this film are down right hard to watch and will have you squiriming in your seat. Though even with the masterful directing of Bahrani, the highlight of this film is without a doubt Andrew Garfield who does some of the best acting of his career. He makes you feel Nash's struggle between doing the right thing and …show more content…
protecting his family and makes this film stand out as one of the best films of the year. However Garfield does not carry this film alone. Laura Dern ,who portrays Lynn Nash Dennis' mother, does exceptionally well to keep up with Garfield's performance and even the young Noah Lomax who plays Dennis' son does his best to keep up with the veterans, however as far as his performance goes it is sub-par at best. Fortunately this film is about Dennis Nash and does not require Lomax to give an incredible performance. As good as 99 Homes is, it does have its flaws.
The main problem I had with the film was how much Lomax was in it. I understand that this film needs to have Dennis' child in order to help develop Dennis but it becomes old very fast and is almost distracting from the story as a whole. The beginning of the film is also fairly hard to follow and Garfield and Shannon's accents caught me a bit off guard though that feeling quickly subsided and from then on the film never looks back and constantly builds suspense with incredibile second and third
acts. As a dedication to the late-film critic Roger Ebert this film gets two thumbs up or 4 out of five stars. While it has a few drawbacks it really is one of the better films that has been released this year and I'd advise you all to watch this film if you get the chance.
Darryl’s life is worth fighting for. “You can’t buy what I’ve got.” ‘The Castle’ directed by Rob Sitch, about one man, his family and neighbours on the verge of being homeless. Darryl Kerrigan, the “backbone of the family” won’t stand for that. Of course no one can buy what he has. He’s spent almost his entire lifetime building what he has, why should he give it up? Darryl’s way of life is simple yet filled with family values. 3 Highview Crescent is the home to Darryl, his wife Sal and their 3 children: Wayne, Steve, Tracy and Dale. (Wayne currently being in jail.) The house is made up of love, and simple family values. Darryl’s also added bits and pieces to it. He’s added on so much to the house, his own personal touch. His neighbours, also in the same bout are almost family to the Kerrigans. Jack and Farouk are another reason why Darryl’s ready to take matters into his own hands.
Acting of movie is very basic for todays standards. The actions of the Miles Bennell aren’t believable or logical. At some points the women of the movie tend of over action simple scenes. The rest of the cast is monotone and have little emotion.It ok casting, but they could of done better. You find yourself laughing at serious point in the film due to the poor acting. This movie could be recut to become a comedy movie, just based off their facial expression.
I feel that the movie has no weaknesses. This is because even though I had a few things I didn’t like such as the anonymity given, I realised that there was a reason for this which I explained in my strengths of the movie below.
The movie is, most likely, done well enough to intrigue its intended audience. It captured the theme and story line of the book. It falls short, though, when compared to the beautiful, sensitive and contemplative prose of Natalie Babbitt. One could only hope that a viewing of the film will lead the watcher to try the book and be delighted all the more.
I think that the opening of the film was not as good as the opening of
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
This film unlike most others on the same topic had no real event to focus on. There was not just one climax or specific scene that the others built up to or supported. I cannot say that I enjoyed it but I do feel it has to a great extent affected me. The only reason I feel that this film is one worth watching is because of the latent message it holds. It very successfully exposes authority and bureaucracy in society. The characters in this film portray people that are either convinced or have been convinced that are crazy.
Although the movie missed an important scene, it managed to pull the audience back in through the action scenes and one charming main character. The treasure hunting really would have tied together all the characters and actions together without leaving the movie unsettled. The scary scenes with Injun Joe really brought the evil character to life all the way from his beginning to his dying end. Then to top off the whole movie, they brought in a curly haired Tom Sawyer. He was like a vision from the book with perfect attitude and slyness that keep you grinning. The movie is an engrossing film with points that leave you anxious and a saucy boy that you can’t help but love.
Honestly I thought that the movie had such a simple story but at the same time it is so complex. The way it was delivered it was amazing, it's such a moving film. The actor’s were amazing, there isn’t anything I would want to change about this film. I would 100% recommend this movie to anyone, its so inspiring and it really makes you think.
The House I Live In. Dir. Eugene Jarecki. Perf. Eugene Jarecki, Nannie Jeter. 2012. Netflix.
Final thoughts, I really liked this film and really can't think of anything I had an issue with. The musics fitting, the cinematography is good and the ending is great. That said the whole time I was watching Re-Animator I kept thinking of how much this film feels like Return of the Living Dead and that made me just want to watch that instead. But that's just me and I still heavily recommend you watch this film should you find yourself with time to watch a true cult classic.
In conclusion I think that book was amazing to read and I really enjoyed interpreting the different themes but the film added more depth and option for opinions for the story. For example hoe the director decided to present the characters and the ending of the book. The book can talk the talk but the film can walk the walk.
...r, this movie is lack of depth of storyline. The audiences can even predict what will happen in the next scenes. Moreover, the ending of this movie is too cheesy and irrational according to me. If only they change the ending to become more interesting and rational, I will give a four or five stars out of five. In spite of a lame twist ending, this movie is a perfect example to show that managers should be able to motivate and challenge their employee. It is important to remember that a happy employee means a productive employee.
Overall, I feel that the movie was a very successful interpretation on the novel and did a wonderful job of portraying what Fitzgerald wrote in this novel. The movie was a success in my eyes and I would recommend both the movie and the novel to anyone.
Although I enjoyed the main portion of the movie, there were some obvious likes and dislikes in my opinion. I believe that I learned from this movie and it helped me understand more of what the people of that time were feeling.