As history shows the issues humanity has gone through, dealing with races, ethnicity, culture and religion, these controversies have not been able to be erased, creating an increasing rate of worldwide complications. One example, is when the Atlantic world was rediscovered humanity had a chance to recreate an ideal world, however, they brought their traditions from the old world generating complications with the New World. In Bacon’s Rebellion the human relations were an extreme issue between both Europeans and Native Americans.
To begin, Bacon’s Rebellion was the first to create a movement about the many attacks both colonist and Indians had been facing in previous matters. Bacon’s Rebellion illustrates the clash between these two completely
…show more content…
different societies, when the Europeans arrived on Native territory (America A Narrative History 67). The competition of survival began in Virginia in 1676 settling onto Chesapeake Bay, where the riot between an Indian and a European planter debated about some hogs (America A Narrative History 68). Later, the Europeans did not appreciate the bickering, and attacked by killing a dozen of Natives (America A Narrative History 68). However, the enraged Natives fought back by murdering the supervisor of Nathaniel Bacon’s land (America A Narrative History 68). Many were impacted by the riot such as women and children that were taken captive and later killed. Bacon then took matters into his own hands, where he presented the situation upon Governor Berkeley, whereas he decided not to revolt against the Natives; therefore, Nathaniel gathered some men to threaten the Indians (America A Narrative History 68). Bacon persisted several times to the governor along with those seated in the council to allow him to create a militia to rampage the Native community. Those who joined Bacon’s small army were promised to be set free from being indentured servants or slaves, so long as they exterminated Indians, they also argued against the richest people in Virginia and politicians even though Nathaniel had a position in the council, but later removed (America A Narrative History 68). Bacon’s external desires were falsified since he was no longer was fighting in the lovely memory of his overseer, but for the ambition to have power over minorities, his morality was then lost (America A Narrative History 68). Bacon still thought that it was wrong for the Natives to have murdered his supervisor and so did the Governor, although he may not have attacked the Indians, he believe if he did, the Anglos would then loose trade with them plummeting the new economy (America A Narrative History 68). Due to the malfunction of the riot, Berkeley was then accused of “corruption” and was attempted to be removed from his position, and later reestablished. Bacon’s army, which then became smaller, burned Jamestown enraged against the decision that had been made on September 19, 1676 (Nps.gov). Despite the victory, Bacon ailed and died within a month leaving no time for celebration for what he disputed (America A Narrative History 68). After Bacon’s death, Berkeley hanged twenty-three men of the army that rebelled against the governing authority causing the Governor to forcefully move back to his native land, England, where he too died within a year (America A Narrative History 68). To continue, Bacon’s Rebellion was possibly the first important riot in history since the colonies were starting to form and the Europeans hadn’t figured out how to live with an ethnic group they have never associated with, just as the Native more than likely felt the same about the colonist (Nps.gov). It is believed that Governor Berkeley intended to make peace with the Natives by keeping the fur trade and exchange gun powder and weapons; however, in a “Long Assembly” of March 1676 they then declared war on all Indians, where the government then took matter into their own hands by placing a defense zone surrounding the colony, as a result the colonist then had to pay higher taxes to support the militia (Nps.gov). Then, Bacon became the general in charge of the defense that was built against the Indians without any interference from the government (Nps.gov). Although the army was small the attention given to general Bacon was powerful enough to create enormous damages to both populations. Notice how many of the Europeans that came to the New World they came as criminals, for religious freedom, or for riches.
Yet, in this circumstance the colonist came together despite their differences and teamed up against the defenseless natives in Bacon’s Rebellion, since the Europeans had taken the weapons they had first given them, so they wouldn’t be able to fight back. The Europeans looked at the Indians as a completely different species, even though they once populated most of the Americas they soon came to be extinct, when the Europeans arrived and conquered the land as their own they had been the intruders that disturbed the peace that the Natives had once lived together. So, this is when the human’s relations interact but in a negative manner, they fight for the land along with the products. Just as racism, that was noted later in history, Natives were also viewed as savages due to the difference in the skin colors, the way they dressed, ate, their spirituality and other minor things that the Anglos would view as “strange”. The way Europe was set up by social class, the class you were born in was the class that defined you in life, you could not move up, so those that came to the Americas would start fresh, unless you were a land owner then you would be considered as wealthy and anyone who was not European or owned land would be considered lower class. Therefore, they also brought from their homeland their traditions and based them on the way they lived there, the Anglos tried to convert everyone else the same as them. The Bacon’s Rebellion was a method that brought these ethnicities together on contradicting sides, just as it joined forces with more European or Africans who gained their “freedom” after, and the Native Americans when they tried fighting back that way they would combine forces with other tribes (pbs.org). The African and the European appear to behave the same creating a correlation between these ethnicities. During this period was when
the idea of slavery and freedom were fabricated that they were two independent ideas that gave Africans the “same” rights as the Anglos, but it didn’t result in the Africans favor (pbs.org). Slaves were treated worse than indentured servants because servants could still speak up about the violence when they were in public places such as church, but the slaves had to deal with the issues of getting hit with switches or other painful objects. Whether the slaves were Native Americans or Africans they were still viewed identically therefore, this again was another example of human relations. Bacon’s Rebellion was “justice” for the supervisor and many other men who had lost their life as Anglos, but that “justice” later caused the Native men to also die, all over a simple fight over the possession of some hogs. Anglos also were confused on which Native tribe had they first encountered the debate over the hogs and caused a killing spree of many innocent Indians, which they then counterattacked causing the entire Rebellion between communities. To conclude, history shows us the mistakes humanity has made, it is also there for us to learn from them and not repeat again. As in Bacon’s Rebellion the colonist upraised against the governing body creating a ripple of effects within a year. It is believed that this simple rebellion has nothing to do with the American Revolution nearly one-hundred years later, but it had the same aspects (Nps.gov). In Bacon’s Rebellion it brings the colony together however, it also disrupts the peace between the Natives, that creates an interaction joining both cultures despite all the tragic lives lost due to the prideful leaders.
Bacon’s Rebellion, King Phillip’s War and the Pequot War were similar in that there were conflicts with Natives over land, however they differed in the ways the wars were carried out and the results of the wars. Bacon’s rebellion was a result of the poorer classes moving west to cultivate land, however they encountered natives and the governor refused to protect them. Likewise the Pequot war was a direct effect of puritans moving westward, additionally all three wars resulted in the colonists as victors. During King Phillip’s war the natives destroyed a fifth of the towns in Masseuses and Rhode Island in contrast to the other wars where the natives did not cause as much damage to the colonists. Bacon’s Rebellion was significant because afterwards
Bacon was a man of opportunity and when a farmer that tried to trade with Native Americans was killed, it became his ticket to making it big in the New World. Only the governor, William Berkley, was allowed to trade with the Native Americans and nobody else. When the farmer was killed, William Berkley denied the upset colonists their desire to fight back. In doing so, it led Bacon to challenge his authority. He began to rally up colonists living in the backcountry where the colonists had no representation, no opportunity to achieve a fortune, and lived in a hostile environment. Everything those colonists did not have would be Bacon’s leverage in convincing them to support him and his cause. He had led 1,000 men to fight with him in hopes to rule the colony and would make changes to their benefit. William Berkley then branded Bacon as a rebel and sent for British troops. Bacon and his supporters then went into the backcountry where he eventually died of
Bacon's Declaration in the Name of the People (30 July 1676) The Declaracon of the People.1.For haveing upon specious pretences of publiqe works raised greate unjust taxes upon the Comonality for the advancement of private favorites and other sinister ends, but noe visible effects in any measure adequate, For not haveing dureing this long time of his Gouvernement in any measure advanced this hopefull Colony either by fortificacons Townes or Trade. 2.For haveing abused and rendred contemptable the Magistrates of Justice, by advanceing to places of Judicature, scandalous and Ignorant favorites. 3.For haveing wronged his Majesties prerogative and interest, by assumeing Monopoly of the Beaver trade, and for haveing in that unjust gaine betrayed
To many of the English colonists, any land that was granted to them in a charter by the English Crown was theirs’, with no consideration for the natives that had already owned the land. This belittlement of Indians caused great problems for the English later on, for the natives did not care about what the Crown granted the colonists for it was not theirs’ to grant in the first place. The theory of European superiority over the Native Americans caused for any differences in the way the cultures interacted, as well as amazing social unrest between the two cultures.
James D. Rice’s Tales From a Revolution is perhaps one of the most important works on early Colonial America. This concise and informative narrative focuses on an important event in American History that has simply been overlooked by many Americans and historians, Bacon’s Rebellion, which occurred in 1676. This revolt played a significant role in the course of history at a pivotal time in early America. Rice focuses on much more than the actual revolt, giving a very vivid and easy to comprehend overview of the occurrences that took place before, during, and after this climactic and transformative event in history that would be one of the first of many rebellions and revolutions that would gradually pave the way for the foundation of America.
When the colonists set sail for the New World, they knew that they would not only have to find a way to survive in the wild new habitat, but would also have to deal with rival nations that were claiming their own share of the new land. There had been long rivalry between France, England, and the Dutch. They had read the stories of Columbus and his voyages, and heard rumors of the wild and strange native people who were considered primitive. The Spanish had two different experiences with the Indigenous
...able behavior far different from that of rebellion.” The colonists held their tongues as long as they could, but in 1676, their frustration grew too strong. Bacon and a thousand Virginians rebelled and overthrew the governor, in what is known as Bacon’s Rebellion. Shortly after the rebellion, Bacon died, and Governor Berkeley returned and viciously crushed the brigands.
In “Bacon's Declaration in the Name of the People” and “The declaration and Remonstrance of Sir William Berkeley his most sacred Majesties Governor and Captain General of Virginia”, they were pretending to be for the people and the king. They put on a facade to cover up their true intentions. Both Nathaniel Bacon and William Berkeley were insistent on discrediting the other by suggesting disloyalty. There was no way to end their debacle calmly.
The British colonies in the 17th century were afflicted by many strenuous periods of tension that boiled over resulting in violent rebellions. Bacon’s Rebellion and the Stono rebellion are two such rebellions that rocked the colonies. These conflicts rose from tension between the governance of the colonies and those who they ruled over. The Stono Rebellion and Bacon’s Rebellion were both examples of the American people’s willful determination, unifying capability, and ability to fight back.
The Europeans invaded America with every intention of occupying the land, the bountiful natural resources as well as the complete domination of the native people. The Europeans desire for the land created an explosive situation for the native peoples as they witnessed their land and right to freedom being stripped from them. They often found themselves having to choose sides of which to pledge their allegiance to. The Europeans depended upon Indian allies to secure the land and their dominance as well as trade relations with the Indians. The Indians were in competition with one another for European trade causing conflict among the different tribes altering the relationships where friends became enemies and vice versa (Calloway, 2012, p. 163). These relationships often became embittered and broke into bloody brawls where it involved, "Indian warriors fighting on both sides, alongside the European forces as well as against European forces invad...
Bacon’s rebellion was a messy but important experiment in expressing the people’s will under the colonial rule of England. History is still developing its interpretation of its causes and effects, but there is no doubt that without Bacon’s actions America’s history might be different today. His actions pointed to a general desire for the kind of self-determination that democracy provides, even if it didn’t quite produce it like the American Revolution did.
During the years of 1675 and 1676 the North American colonies experienced conflicts that shaped the dynamics of their colonial life. King Phillip's War would effectively end relations between the New England colonists and the Indians. Also, the rebellion in Virginia led by Nathaniel Bacon stressed the growing discontent of poor frontier farmers for British rule. The consequences of these two events clearly had an impact on different levels that would extend well beyond their time. Therefore, the years 1675 and 1676 played a very significant role in the Northern American colonies.
The clash between the Native Americans and the colonists did not start off tumultuous. In the early days of the exploration and settlement of the New World they lived in peace. The Indians taught them how to farm and live off the land. In a strange land the colonists made an ally. However, the subsequent turn of events was inevitable. Perhaps the chaos that ensued could have been postponed but there was never going to be a peaceful cohabitation between the colonists and the indigenous people. There were so many vast differences between the religious views and ultimate goals of the two groups. The Native Americans had established trade relationships with various tribes, they had their own religions, and their way of life was a stark contrast to that of the colonists. The worldview of the respective peoples was foreign to the other and the idea of a holistic and unbiased approach to the life of others was foreign.
The American Revolution was sparked by a myriad of causes. These causes in themselves could not have sparked such a massive rebellion in the nation, but as the problems of the colonies cumulated, their collective impact spilt over and the American Revolution ensued. Many say that this war could have been easily avoided and was poorly handled by both sides, British and American; but as one will see, the frame of thought of the colonists was poorly suited to accept British measures which sought to “overstep” it’s power in the Americas. Because of this mindset, colonists developed a deep resentment of British rule and policies; and as events culminated, there was no means to avoid revolution and no way to turn back.
Tension and disputes are sometimes resolved by force but more often by negotiation or treaties. On the other hand, the Natives were described as strong and very innocent creatures awaiting the first opportunity to be christianized. The Indians were called the “Noble Savages” by the settlers because they were cooperative people, but sometimes, after having a few conflicts with them, they seem to behave like animals. We should apprehend that the encounter with the settlers really amazed the natives, they were only used to interacting with people from their own race and surroundings and all of this was like a new discovery for them as well as for the white immigrants. The relations between the English and the Virginian Indians were somewhat strong in a few ways.