Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Native american colonial relations
Native american colonial relations
Native american colonial relations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Native american colonial relations
In 1676, Doeg Indians attacked white Settlers for trying to settle in their land. Nathaniel Bacon, an aristocrat, was extremely worried so he rounded up other landowners, and against the will of the governor, Sir William Berkley, he struck out against the Indians. Berkley declared Bacon and his men rebels thus starting Bacon’s rebellion. The rebellion would not have happened if there was not so much hate against the Indians, if the white Settlers were not forcing Indians to convert and assimilate, and finally if the government actually had control of its people.The geography of the land was barely a reason for the rebellion, ultimately it was the disatisfaction of the people and failure of the government. Firstly, the Settlers have always throughout history hated the native Americans. A good example would be Christopher Columbus’s and Hernando Cortez’s treatment of the Indians. Columbus took back Indians as slaves to show that they found Asia so they could trade with them again. Trading with a people does not mean enslaving them and using them as labor later on. During the Pequot War white Settlers …show more content…
under the command of Captain John Mason surrounded a palisade with Indians in it and lit it on fire. Hundreds of Indians died due to the burning or whilst trying to escape and those who did escape were hunted down, captured, and then sold into slavery. During Virginia’s expansion they had to suppress local Indians that tried to hinder their expansion efforts. Sir Thomas Dale led unrelenting attacks against the Powhatan Indians, note this is all in the name of expansion, and also kidnapped the Powhatan chief’s daughter. There were more intrusions and atrocities made against the Indians in the name of expansion and search for wealth so taking in the fact that Settlers hate the Indians and vice versa is not at all confusing if the past is reread. Secondly, if the white Settlers did not try to assimilate the Indians into their culture and society. Since the very beginning explorers came to the New World not only to become rich but also to spread their faith. Christopher Columbus said himself that his voyage was a religious one. The settlers had so many different cultures and faiths and they were never able to accept the Indians faith. Puritans believed that the solution to their “Indian” problem was to “civilize” them and by civilize them they mean assimilate them into the white culture and faith. John Eliot, a missionary, translated the Bible into an Algonquian language so the Indians could read the Bible and convert to the white man’s faith. The white Settlers were not ready to accept the Indian faith anytime soon due to all the Missionaries, Jesuits, and Monks arriving into the New World. Finally, it was the failure of the government that caused Nathaniel Bacon fight against the Indians and to eventually rebel against Sir William Berkley.
Bacon already had a grudge against Berkley due to Berkley not allowing Bacon the right to get into the fur trade. Berkley failed to appease men of his council, Nathaniel Bacon, because he wanted to have the fur trade monopolized for himself. When Bacon went against the Indians, Berkley failed to stop him then and there which allowed Bacon to siege and eventually gain control of Jamestown. Eventually Bacon died and Sir William Berkley came back with the King’s men and gained authority again. The governor, Sir William Berkley, could have prevented Bacon from rebelling in the first place but failed to do so and he never stopped Bacon from taking the colony from him resulting in the failure of the government and the
governor. In conclusion, the people’s dissatisfaction was shown through them hating the Indians, hating and wanting to change the Indian’s faith, and their dissatisfaction with the government. Sir William Berkley’s failure as governor shows the failure of the government because he had the ruling hand in the colony. The Bacon’s Rebellion was just another occurrence of the Settlers not listening to the governing body and killing Indians because they wanted to prove that they were stronger than the Indians and that they came to take and conquer.
Bacon’s Rebellion, King Phillip’s War and the Pequot War were similar in that there were conflicts with Natives over land, however they differed in the ways the wars were carried out and the results of the wars. Bacon’s rebellion was a result of the poorer classes moving west to cultivate land, however they encountered natives and the governor refused to protect them. Likewise the Pequot war was a direct effect of puritans moving westward, additionally all three wars resulted in the colonists as victors. During King Phillip’s war the natives destroyed a fifth of the towns in Masseuses and Rhode Island in contrast to the other wars where the natives did not cause as much damage to the colonists. Bacon’s Rebellion was significant because afterwards
Bacon was a man of opportunity and when a farmer that tried to trade with Native Americans was killed, it became his ticket to making it big in the New World. Only the governor, William Berkley, was allowed to trade with the Native Americans and nobody else. When the farmer was killed, William Berkley denied the upset colonists their desire to fight back. In doing so, it led Bacon to challenge his authority. He began to rally up colonists living in the backcountry where the colonists had no representation, no opportunity to achieve a fortune, and lived in a hostile environment. Everything those colonists did not have would be Bacon’s leverage in convincing them to support him and his cause. He had led 1,000 men to fight with him in hopes to rule the colony and would make changes to their benefit. William Berkley then branded Bacon as a rebel and sent for British troops. Bacon and his supporters then went into the backcountry where he eventually died of
Things in Jamestown were good. The people were fed, cared for, and happy. They created their own working government order, but, in a place where everything seems perfect, there is always one man to disagree. In this case, his name was Nathaniel Bacon.
In Jamestown, the settlers had to deal with the Powhatan Indians. The relationships with them were unstable. John Smith, whom was the leader of Jamestown, was captured by these Indians while he was on a little trip with some of his men. As he left two of his men, he came back to find them dead and himself surrounded by two hundred members of the tribe, finding himself being captured. “Six or seven weeks those barbarians kept him prisoner…” 87). After this event, the relationship only grew worse and there was constant fighting between the settlers and Indians. The Indians practiced many methods in capturing settlers such as “scalping” and other dreadful techniques. The settlers did many negative practices also which is the reason they fought so many wars and battles against each other. Later on, the Indians killed the English for their weapons that were rare to them. In contrast to the Plymouth colony, these settlers dealt with the Pequot Indians and the relations were much more peaceful for a certain time frame. At one point, one Indian was brave enough to approach them and spoke to them (in broken English). He taught them the ways of the land, and developed a peace with the man. The settlers from the Plymouth colony learned many ways to grow food from these Indians. “He directed them how to set their corn, where to take fish and to procure other commodities, and was also their
To many of the English colonists, any land that was granted to them in a charter by the English Crown was theirs’, with no consideration for the natives that had already owned the land. This belittlement of Indians caused great problems for the English later on, for the natives did not care about what the Crown granted the colonists for it was not theirs’ to grant in the first place. The theory of European superiority over the Native Americans caused for any differences in the way the cultures interacted, as well as amazing social unrest between the two cultures.
James D. Rice’s Tales From a Revolution is perhaps one of the most important works on early Colonial America. This concise and informative narrative focuses on an important event in American History that has simply been overlooked by many Americans and historians, Bacon’s Rebellion, which occurred in 1676. This revolt played a significant role in the course of history at a pivotal time in early America. Rice focuses on much more than the actual revolt, giving a very vivid and easy to comprehend overview of the occurrences that took place before, during, and after this climactic and transformative event in history that would be one of the first of many rebellions and revolutions that would gradually pave the way for the foundation of America.
...able behavior far different from that of rebellion.” The colonists held their tongues as long as they could, but in 1676, their frustration grew too strong. Bacon and a thousand Virginians rebelled and overthrew the governor, in what is known as Bacon’s Rebellion. Shortly after the rebellion, Bacon died, and Governor Berkeley returned and viciously crushed the brigands.
Nathaniel Bacon attempted to damage William Berkeley’s reputation by accusing Berkeley of not protecting the people in the Colony. He wanted to show why he should lead the people of Virginia. Berkeley had certain people
The Stono Rebellion and Bacon’s Rebellion both thoroughly demonstrated the determination of the American people in the British colonies. Despite the brutal treatment that slaves received and the inadequate policies for protecting the farmers of Virginia, both groups of people rose up in distinguished acts of defiance. These revolutionaries both had the goal to make a point to the British government that they are to be feared and not trampled upon. The Virginian farmers did not accept the policies of William Berkley and instead of living under his power, they rose up to fight
The Europeans invaded America with every intention of occupying the land, the bountiful natural resources as well as the complete domination of the native people. The Europeans desire for the land created an explosive situation for the native peoples as they witnessed their land and right to freedom being stripped from them. They often found themselves having to choose sides of which to pledge their allegiance to. The Europeans depended upon Indian allies to secure the land and their dominance as well as trade relations with the Indians. The Indians were in competition with one another for European trade causing conflict among the different tribes altering the relationships where friends became enemies and vice versa (Calloway, 2012, p. 163). These relationships often became embittered and broke into bloody brawls where it involved, "Indian warriors fighting on both sides, alongside the European forces as well as against European forces invad...
During the years of 1675 and 1676 the North American colonies experienced conflicts that shaped the dynamics of their colonial life. King Phillip's War would effectively end relations between the New England colonists and the Indians. Also, the rebellion in Virginia led by Nathaniel Bacon stressed the growing discontent of poor frontier farmers for British rule. The consequences of these two events clearly had an impact on different levels that would extend well beyond their time. Therefore, the years 1675 and 1676 played a very significant role in the Northern American colonies.
The clash between the Native Americans and the colonists did not start off tumultuous. In the early days of the exploration and settlement of the New World they lived in peace. The Indians taught them how to farm and live off the land. In a strange land the colonists made an ally. However, the subsequent turn of events was inevitable. Perhaps the chaos that ensued could have been postponed but there was never going to be a peaceful cohabitation between the colonists and the indigenous people. There were so many vast differences between the religious views and ultimate goals of the two groups. The Native Americans had established trade relationships with various tribes, they had their own religions, and their way of life was a stark contrast to that of the colonists. The worldview of the respective peoples was foreign to the other and the idea of a holistic and unbiased approach to the life of others was foreign.
One of the critical tasks that faced the new nation of the United States was establishing a healthy relationship with the Native Americans (Indians). “The most serious obstacle to peaceful relations between the United States and the Indians was the steady encroachment of white settlers on the Indian lands. The Continental Congress, following [George] Washington’s suggestion, issued a proclamation prohibiting unauthorized settlement or purchase of Indian land.” (Prucha, 3) Many of the Indian tribes had entered into treaties with the French and British and still posed a military threat to the new nation.
During the numerous years of colonization, the relationship between the English settlers and the Native Americans of the area was usually the same. Native Americans would initially consider the settlers to be allies, then as time passed, they would be engaged in wars with them in a struggle for control of the land. This process of friendship to enemies seemed to be the basic pattern in the majority of the colonies.
Hunting and farming was the main religion of the Indians. Settlers started treating Natives different way than they used to, it is was because of religion. Europeans and the Natives had issues about land and the religious beliefs. Meanwhile, settlers started demanding private land and asked Indians to stay off the settler’s land. This literally became the main cause of the war.