Ayman Odeh Parallelism

646 Words2 Pages

While Israel celebrates its hard-fought independence as a Jewish state, Palestine is still fighting for its rights. Ayman Odeh, a Palestinian contributor, writes about Palestinian’s hidden struggle with Nakba, which refers to the catastrophe of the Israel declaration of independence that resulted in the displacement of millions of Palestinians. In his Op-Ed piece, Odeh’s use of repetition, pathos and parallelism reveals his message of how Israel is acting immorally towards Palestinians.
By using repetition, Odeh demonstrates how oppression against Palestinians is continual and ongoing. He achieves this effect by describing the plight of the village of Umm al-Hiran, where the people were constantly bargaining with the Israeli government to receive recognition and basic utilities. However, they receive no such aid: “[T]he state dug in its heels in and refused, bulldozing the village over and over.” Odeh uses repetition in the end of the …show more content…

He states that to end Nakba Israel must accept and respect the existence of Palestinians, especially in their education system, writing, “The Nakba will end when Jewish school children learn the culture or Arab Palestinian, just as Arab children learn Jewish history and culture.” In this sentence, he employs parallelism to compare two ideas: Jewish children learning Palestinian culture and Arab children learning Jewish history and culture. These two ideas are similar, as evidenced by their similar grammatical structure and word choice, but they are also contrasting ideas. The meaning of the sentence is that Arab children are already learning Jewish culture, but Jewish children are not. The use of parallelism in two contrasting ideas highlights the inequality between Jewish and Arab children. Odeh’s message is that the unfairness in Israeli society extends all the way down into children’s

Open Document