In the early morning hours of December 14, the defendant led police on a high-speed automobile chase through several neighborhoods and on to the freeway. The chase began when the defendant ran a red light in the city limits. He and was then pursued by a member of the city police; and the chase ended nearly twenty-five minutes later when the defendant unsuccessfully attempted to exit the freeway. His actions caused his automobile to leave the pavement, cut through a wooden fence, and then come to a rest in the backyard of a residence. The defendant then got out of his car and fled from police on foot. After a 30-minute search police apprehended the defendant while he was hiding in a bush. The arresting officer stated that the defendant was
On March 24, 2016, officers were dispatched to a scene where a male subject was trying to gain entry into a vehicle using a hammer. Upon arrival officers made contact with a male subject who was later identified as Keith Hunt, the defendant, and the victim. The victim explained to the officers she was standing near the trunk of her vehicle when Mr. Hunt approached, He attempted to keep into her vehicle without permission; so she confronted the defendant and tried to secure her vehicle. Mr. Hunt demanded she give him the keys and her wallet. The victim stated the defendant had a hammer in his hand and was threatening her with it while he was telling her to hand over the property. They began to struggle over the keys and the victim screamed
Facts: On July 29,2003 Detective Jason Leavitt was doing his usually undercover work, dressed in all black with twenty on dollar bill hanging out his pocket. Leavitt was then approached by the Miller (defendant) asking him for money. The detective refused to give him the money, in return the appellant put his arm around the detective’s neck taking the cash out of his front pocket. The arrest time the pulled up and took Miller into custody and charged him with larceny. Miller was convicted, and sentenced by the district courts to spend up to thirty two months, but no less than 12 months in jail.
The police responded to a tip that a home was being used to sell drugs. When they arrived at the home, Gant answered the door and stated that he expected the owner to return home later. The officers left and did a record check of Gant and found that his driver’s license had been suspended and there was a warrant for his arrest. The officers returned to the house later that evening and Gant wasn’t there. Gant returned shortly and was recognized by officers. He parked at the end of the driveway and exited his vehicle and was placed under arrest 10 feet from his car and was placed in the back of the squad car immediately. After Gant was secured, two officers searched his car and found a gun and a bag of cocaine.
On 01-01-17 at 0023 hours I was monitoring the radio and heard that Officer Harrell #3441 and Officer Thebeau #8402 were involved in a vehicle pursuit in the area of Fair Oaks Avenue and Corson Street. I responded to the above location to assist. They advised responding units that the suspect was involved in a traffic collision on the eastbound 210 Freeway Fair Oaks Avenue off-ramp.
On June 26, 2006, a Sheriff Officer of the State of Florida, William Wheetley and his drug detection dog, Aldo, were on patrol. Furthermore, Officer Wheetley conducted a traffic stop of the defendant Clayton Harris for expired tags on his truck. As Officer Wheetley approached the truck, he noticed that Harris was acting nervous/anxious, more than he should have, and he also noticed an open can of beer in the cup holder next to him. At that moment, Officer Wheetley knew that he was hiding something, he requested to search
The issue is whether there was a 4th Amendment and 6th Amendment violation in the search of the car and the subsequent confession.
Introduction/Objective: Team 1 selected the short case study of CarMax vs. AutoNation vs. ZAG, (De Wit, & Meyer, 2010). Each member of the team reviewed the selected reading to identify the changes in the business model, convergence, compliance and the paradox within the case study. This case study was brief, but very informative and provided an excellent example of the effects that business model change can have on the automotive industry. By challenging industry rules tension was noted, therefore forcing the competition to conform to new standards through compliance or choice of redirection. Breaking industry rules can actually be beneficial in establishing a competitive edge against the competition. According to the authors, De Wit &
Petitioner David Leon Riley was originally stopped for a traffic violation. The registration tags on the car that Riley was driving were currently expired. During the traffic stop the police officer also learned that Riley’s driver license was suspended. Police policy required the police officer to impound the vehicle because Riley’s license was suspended. Continuing to follow police policy a second police officer performed an inventory search of Riley’s car. The search led to Riley’s arrest for possession of two loaded handguns that were found under the hood of the car. The officer also proceeded to seize Riley’s cell phone which was located in his pocket. About two hours after the arrest a gang unit detective analyzed the content on Riley’s cell phone. As a result, Riley was tied to a shooting that had occurred several weeks early. In relation to the shooting Riley was charged with firing at an occupied vehicle, attempted murder, and assault with
I observed the officer claim that when he questions the defendant, he felt as if he was off. The victim gives a full detail report to the officer, describing what the person looked like and everything. One of the officers had taken his picture, and sent one to the transit police, to see if it was the same person they were looking for. In the meantime, the woman officer was interrogating him about where he has been and of prescription medication that was discovered in his bag. However, the defendant lied about why his taking the medicine. I observed that the police mentioned the defendant was very yielding and being extremely corporative. The officer mentioned that he took him to the hospital for psych assessment being that he was acting odd, so they kept him because of strange behavior. I observed the officer mention that from there, they got a report that the defendant was the same person they were looking at in the pictures. It was at the hospital that they arrested the defendant.
Lisa stated this morning at the listed location; she set up a yard sale table, along with several other neighbors. During the set-up process, the accused, Marion Wagner, approached her advising her she was not able to set up the table. Lisa advised she was able to be here since it’s on the sidewalk and that she wouldn't be any more than a few hours here. Lisa stated that Marion approached her, got up in her face, and then struck her in with a closed fist. Lisa then fell to the ground and started to bleed from her nose. Lisa is herein referred to as the victim. It's to be noted that Lisa refused any medical attention.
...th a growing proportion of elderly people. Global market dynamics and innovations in big data and social networking are transforming the business strategies of companies everywhere—and forcing them to rethink fundamental rules of engagement. For better or worse, the future entrepreneurs will have to surface as one the most disruptive forces. As big data pushes for alternative ways of working – proactive solutions that drive information must quickly figure out which new policies and tools can be utilized most effectively. This grants enormous opportunities for key technological breakthroughs that will be needed for the next generation of transport.
There are 5 stages that consisted in the buyer decision process of a traditional Porsche customer such as need recognition, information search, evaluation of alternatives, purchase decision and postpurchase behavior.
It all starts when I was watching the ad on TV for the car I always dreamed of, a BMW 528 x drive. The offer was so attractive given that the monthly payments shown were actually within my budget. Though the ad mentioned leasing not selling, therefor I need to know: what is car leasing? How the process works? How it is different than buying? Should I lease or buy my next car? How should I prepare for the lease? What is the deal I am looking for? How to negotiate a good deal? What are the after deal obligations? What are my lease end term options? And what happen if I decided to end the contract before the end of the lease term?
The Ford Motor Company has gone through various strategic challenges especially during the recent harsh economic spells that have been witnessed. However despite all these tough times, Ford can be counted among the most financially stable American automobile manufacturers. This company holds sufficient resources to carry on with its operations through to the year 2015, providing we do not experience any unseen problems in our global markets. Financial analysts have projected that our company is not going to need any government funding in the near future not unless our sales for 2015 fall below 12 million.
Toyota Motor Corporation Case Study. Toyota Motor Corporation is a Japanese multinational corporation. It is currently the world's largest automaker. Mission "Toyota Motor Corporation is a company devoted to enhancing the quality of life for people around the world by providing useful and appealing products" (Toyota Motor Corporation, 1994). Its mission has not changed much in the past few years, for the current mission of Toyota can be characterized as becoming the world's leading vehicle manufacturer, which means that it expects to sell more cars than any competitors, whilst setting benchmarks on product quality and production efficiency.