Atomic Weapons Persuasive Speech

697 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Effects of the atomic bomb on the world

Atomic weapons represent an immediate and steady danger to individuals all over. A long way from keeping the peace, they breed dread and doubt among countries. These extreme instruments of dread and mass decimation have no true blue military or key utility and are pointless in tending to any of today's genuine security dangers, for example, psychological warfare, environmental change, outrageous destitution, overpopulation, and sickness. With regards to atomic weapons, there are no sheltered hands. For whatever length of time that any nation has these weapons, others will need them, and the world will be in a problematic state which places us in a condition of hazard at all circumstances. Atomic weapons don't stop psychological oppressors. …show more content…

Our contentions are between us, nature couldn't think less about religion, legislative issues, and control of regular assets. That being said the aftermath from atomic radiation influences nature. Any utilization of atomic weapons would have disastrous outcomes. No viable philanthropic reaction would be conceivable, and the impacts of radiation on individuals would bring about affliction and passing such a variety of years after the underlying blast. Take the instance of Japan, they surrendered however now the general population of those territories have been influenced by two or three eras now, of a contention a great many people on the planet will just involvement through recorded content and motion pictures. Another case was of Red Forest; the result of Chernobyl was appalling since individuals for a long time after were conceived with distortions. It would take under .1% of the unstable yield of the current worldwide atomic arms stockpile ti realize obliterating agrarian crumple and boundless starvation. The smoke and tidy from less than 100 Hiroshima estimated atomic blasts would bring about an unexpected drop in worldwide temperatures furthermore in

Show More
Related

  • DBQ part 2

    544 Words  | 2 Pages

    In today’s society, many countries and even citizens of the United States question the U.S. government’s decision to get involved in nuclear warfare. These people deemed it unnecessary and stated that the U.S. is a hypocrite that preaches peace, but causes destruction and death. Before and during World War II the U.S. was presented with a difficult decision on whether or not to develop and use the atomic bomb. The U.S. decided to develop the atomic bomb based on the fear they had for the safety of the nation. In August 1939 nuclear physicists sent manuscripts to Albert Einstein in fear the Germany might use the new knowledge of fission on the uranium nucleus as way to construct weapons.

    Read More

  • Short Story Analysis Of There Will Come Soft Rains By Ray Bradbury

    872 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1945, the United States released a nuclear bomb that destroyed the city of Hiroshima. Nagasaki was also bombed. Thousands of people died and a quarter of a million more perished of radiation poisoning (“There Will Come Soft Rains (short story)”). With the development of nuclear weapons in the world the possibility of a nuclear war was a daily fear within people (“There Will Come Soft Rains (short story)”).

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On The Atomic Bomb

    1439 Words  | 3 Pages

    “The atomic bomb certainly is the most powerful of all weapons, but it is conclusively powerful and effective only in the hands of the nation which controls the sky” (Johnson 1). Throughout World War II, the war was in pieces. The Germans were almost at world domination along with their allies, the Italians and Japanese. The Japanese and United states had remained at combat with each other since the bombarding of the Pearl Harbor ("U.S. Drops Atomic Bomb on Japan "1). There was abundant controversy as to whether the United States should have used the atomic bombs or not. There were many factors as to the argument relating to the atomic bombs leading to the United States final decision. Many people had arguments for the bombing and others had arguments against the bombings but it is still not determined if the United States made the right decision.

    Read More

  • Truman's Atomic Dilemma: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

    980 Words  | 2 Pages

    “With this bomb we have now added a new and revolutionary increase in destruction to supplement the growing power of our armed forces”- President Truman. In the 1945, President Truman was faced with an atomic dilemma in the most destructive war that mankind has seen so far. His choices were to either bomb Japan or let more American soldiers die. He chose to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He chose the most likeable choice in America at the time. If I was able to tell President Truman one thing, it would be, drop the atomic bombs on Japan and end the four year war for America. Japan started the war on America with the bombing of Pearl Harbor, America repaid the debt back to Japan many fold(top secret).

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On The Atomic Bomb

    1704 Words  | 4 Pages

    Near the end of the Second World War, America and Japan continue to fight with no signs of surrender in sight from either side. President Truman warned the government of Japan that he would use weapons of mass destruction if there was not an end to the war, but they refused to surrender. The decision that Japan made to ignore President Truman left him with two choices; develop the atomic bomb or invade Japan with American forces and allies. After careful consideration, President Truman made the choice to develop and use the nuclear bombs as a way to end World War II. On August 6, 1945, the president unleashed the massive weapon of destruction on the city of Hiroshima dropping the atomic bomb code named “Little Boy”. A few days later on August

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On The Atomic Bomb

    1034 Words  | 3 Pages

    On August 6, 1945, the first bomb was dropped on the city of Hiroshima. Three days later on August 9, the second bomb hit Nagasaki. Whether the United States made a moral and ethical decision is still an ongoing debate. President Truman was faced with a difficult choice. The U.S. chose to adopt a stance that seemed to limit the amount of casualties in the war, by significantly shortening it with the use of atomic weapons. It was certainly a reasonable view for the USA to take, since they had suffered the loss of more than thousands of lives, both military and civilian. To the top rank of the US military the death toll was worth it to prevent the “many thousands of American troops that would have been killed in invading Japan.” This was a grave

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech On Nuclear Power

    949 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Face it. Nukes are the most climate-friendly industrial-scale form of energy” (Power, Reiss, Pearlstein, 655). This statement is what I’m trying to promote through my argument. It also ties Inconvenient Truths: 10 Green Heresies by Matt Powers, Spencer Reiss, and Jonanna Pearlstein and Nuclear Power is Best Energy Source: Potchef Stroom together by bring out the main point all authors are trying to get across. Global warming has been a big concern for years now and one of the biggest causes for it, is the burning of fossil fuels to get energy. People that live in the United States of America use a huge amount of energy in their daily lives and that amount continues to grow with our population growing with it. My purpose of this piece is to persuade people to switch to nuclear power for a cleaner energy source because it’s the cleanest energy source.

    Read More

  • The Atomic Bomb Changed the World Forever

    2532 Words  | 6 Pages

    The development and usage of the first atomic bombs has caused a change in military, political, and public functionality of the world today. The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki revolutionized warfare by killing large masses of civilian population with a single strike. The bombs’ effects from the blast, extreme heat, and radiation left an estimated 140,000 people dead. The bombs created a temporary resolution that lead to another conflict. The Cold War was a political standoff between the Soviet Union and the United States that again created a new worldwide nuclear threat. The destructive potential of nuclear weapons had created a global sweep of fear as to what might happen if these terrible forces where unleashed again. The technology involved in building the first atomic bombs has grown into the creation of nuclear weapons that are potentially 40 times more powerful than the original bombs used. However, a military change in strategy has came to promote nuclear disarmament and prevent the usage of nuclear weapons. The technology of building the atomic bomb has spurred some useful innovations that can be applied through the use of nuclear power. The fear of a potential nuclear attack had been heightened by the media and its release of movies impacting on public opinion and fear of nuclear devastation. The lives lost after the detonation of the atomic bombs have become warning signs that changed global thinking and caused preventative actions.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Speech On Nuclear Energy

    877 Words  | 2 Pages

    Specific purpose: To persuade the audience that nuclear power is the best source of energy today.

    Read More

  • War: Nuclear Power

    1074 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Cold War was a time of great tension all over the world. From 1945 to 1989, the United States was the leader and nuclear power and was competing with the Soviet Union to create huge stockpiles of nuclear weapons. However, even though the Cold War ended, nuclear weapons are still a threat. Countries around the world strive to create nuclear power, and they do not promise to use it for peaceful purposes. Some examples of the struggles caused by nuclear weapons include the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and Iran’s recent nuclear weapon program. Surely, nuclear weapons have created conflict all over the world since the Cold War era.

    Read More

  • Why Was Hiroshima Bad

    465 Words  | 1 Pages

    That was not the only result it also injured a lot of people, there were 35,000 people injured, and some of they died because of their injuries. Also, a lot of people got sick because of the radiation and died some time after. This was not the only effect; the city today still faces the effect of the atomic bomb. Hiroshima faced the effects of the atomic bomb for many years after the bomb was dropped. A lot of people got sick because of the radiation weeks, months, and even years later, and most of the times they died because of that.

    Read More

  • Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

    955 Words  | 2 Pages

    If you were told you the worlds most dangerous weapon was capable of bringing peace would you think it was crazy nonsense? The history of nuclear weapons is surprisingly short, but their ethics are extremely complex and open to debate. In discussions of the atomic bomb, one controversial issue has been of the morality of nuclear weapons. On the one hand, some argue it’s an evil tool that only brings despair and destruction in its wake. On the other hand, some contend nuclear weapons have, albeit counterintuitively, become integral to the good life because the destructive potential they carry has the power to stop wars, prevent wars, and change foreign relations.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis: A World Free Of Nuclear Weapons

    1417 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nuclear Weapons are a highly polarizing issue in both countries with and without nuclear capability. Currently, there are nine countries with nuclear weapons: Pakistan, India, France, United Kingdom, Russia, China, Israel, North Korea, and the USA. Due to this polarization, many people, such as George P. Shultz, William J. Perry, et. al. in their article A World Free of Nuclear Weapons, advocate for the eradication of nuclear weapons while other people, such as Jonathan Tepperman in his article Why Obama Should Learn to Love the Bomb, believe that nuclear weapons should not be eradicated and that they prevent armed conflicts between the nuclear states.

    Read More

  • Kenneth Waltz The Spread Of Nuclear Weapons

    876 Words  | 2 Pages

    On other way, nuclear weapons also can act as to scare that country out of making them by threatening to visit unacceptable punishment upon it. This is best called as ‘to deter’ or in simplest word to stop someone from doing something by frightening him (Waltz, 1981). Deterrence is achieved not through the ability to defend but through the ability to punish. Other than that, states may also uses force for coercion. Coercion is not to deter but more to compel another state from taking an action and the strategy of blackmailing by using the nuclear threat is the most effective strategy of coercion.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

    1730 Words  | 4 Pages

    Wives became widows, fathers became lonely, and people became traumatized by the very events to ruin the futures they believed to be their own. The world was frozen in disbelief at the news of the a-bomb dropping. Tokyo had not believed it, dismissing the truth as rumors, and only the military had known that it was reality (Ham). Who could believe that something that was physically there the day before could have been obliterated, leaving nothing behind but shadows from where people literally burned

    Read More

More about Atomic Weapons Persuasive Speech

Open Document