Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The features and the limitations of the Athenian democracy
The features and the limitations of the Athenian democracy
Merits and demerits of democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 508 B.C, a civil war in Athens ceased; giving rise to a new democratic constitution under the leadership of Cleisthenes. The changes made under his leadership and other subsequent reforms resulted in a relatively radical form of government for the time known as democracy (Hyland Lecture, 26/09/2013). Democracy is a system of collective decision-making in which the participants have equality at least at one essential point of the decision making process (Christiano, “Democracy”). Furthermore, the term ‘democracy’, which comes from the Greeks, literally means rule by the people. The system of government, created by the Greeks, known as Democracy possessed many unique characteristics such as judicial review that have come to influence modern governments. The principle of equality allowed all Athenian citizens to participate in government on an equal level, a practice that as Plato pointed out is no longer feasible. Ancient Athenian democracy also utilized direct representation and did not distinguish political rights from individual rights. In this way, while Athenian democracy has influenced modern democracies through ideas such as equality and checks and balances, it cannot be said to be democratic in the modern sense of the term due to its utilization of institutions and promotion of values that no longer are applicable or desired in the modern realm of politics. Since the time of Athenian democracy, the world has experienced many intellectual movements including the enlightenment, Protestant Reformation, and the industrial revolution to name a few that have forced governments to change in response to new popular opinion and technology.
The Athenian government structure consisted of an Assembly, the Council of 500, a system of...
... middle of paper ...
...stems to create new structures to serve the interests of society.
Works Cited
Birch, Anthony Harold. The Concepts and Theories of Modern Democracy. London: Routledge, 1993. Print.
Christiano, Tom. "Democracy." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, 27 July 2006. Web. 4 Nov. 2013.
Held, David. Models of Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP, 1987. Print.
Hyland, Eddie. “Class Notes.” History of Political Thought Lecture. 26 Sept. 2013.
Jones, A. H. M. "The Economic Basis of the Athenian Democracy." Past and Present 1.1 (1952): 13-31. JSTOR. Web. 4 Nov. 2013.
Jones, A.H M. "The Athenian Democracy and Its Critics." Cambridge Historical Journal 11.1 (1953): 1-26. JSTOR. Web. 4 Nov. 2013.
Pickles, Dorothy Maud. Democracy. New York: Basic, 1971. Print.
Sartori, Giovanni. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1987. Print.
In comparing the Ancient Athenian system of government, and the Modern Day American political system, there are many similarities. In Ancient Athens, democracy was developed in response to a long history of oppressive rulers who used their position of power for their own benefit. Ancient Athenians sought a government where all citizens were considered equal under the eyes of the law, and all had a fair say in the running of their country. Following a series
The origin of the Athenian democracy of the fifth and for centuries can be traced back to Solon. Solon was a poet and a wise statesmen but not a Democrat. His constitutional reform package laid the basis on which an aristocrat called Cleisthenes could pioneer democracy. Cleisthenes championed a radical political reform movement which in 508 -507 ushered in the Athenian democratic constitution. Under this political system Athens successfully resisted the Persian onslaughts that victory in turn encourage the poorest Athenian's to demand a greater say in the ruling of their city. In the late 460's a radicalization of power shifted the balance decisively to the poorest sections of society. This was the democratic Athens that laid the foundations of Western rational and critical thought.
1. Janda, Kenneth. The Challenge of Democracy. Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston, MA. 1999. (Chapter 3 & 4).
It is surprising indeed that Even today, tyrannies and dictatorships exist in the world when more than two and a half thousand years ago the ancient Athenians had developed a functional and direct form of democracy. What contributed to this remarkable achievement and how it changed the socio-political. scene in Athens is what will be considered in this paper. The paper will have three sections, each detailing the various stages. of political development from the kings of Attica to the time of Pericles when, in its golden age, Athens was at the height of its. imperial power.
Athenian government is democratic, and its citizens play a major role in shaping the government. Athenian ‘citizens’ are comprised only of adult males; women, children, metics, and slave...
Ancient Athens was, at first, rule aristocratically and this benefited a small group of elites. However, there began a major demand for political equality by the wealthy merchants and working class; therefore the aristocrats were forced to compromise or face a major civil war. The aristocrats gave political power to the people of Athens and this restored the power balance within the state. These events lead to the birth of democracy. In Manin’s The Principles of Representative Government, he discusses the creation of the assembly where people would come to vote on local political issues (Manin 11). Along with the assembly, they created mechanisms to avoid demagogues (ostracism and ‘graphe para nomo’) and a lottery system to choose political figures so there is equality among all citizens. Athens functioned and flourished on two core beliefs in the polis: “1. We all have an understanding of what is happening around us and fix it. 2. No one person can take away our right to govern” (Breaugh). Everyone has the ability to rule and must rule, was an essential part of the polis. Additionally, every citizen was equal to one another, within the polis. In the lecture, Breaugh mentioned, “the community would help to define you as a citizen, and the citizen helps define the community” (Breaugh). Political participation was believed to be a vital part of every man’s self-development and, most importantly,
Raaflaub, Kurt A., and Josiah Ober. Origins of democracy in ancient Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.
In making this argument this essay seeks to five things. Firstly, to define democracy within the contemporary context offering the key characteristics of a modern re...
With an understanding of the structure of both aristocratic parties and the monarchy for which holds each altogether, we can evaluate democracy. For Spartan society, to an extent, individuals were still elected for Ephors and Gerousia positions, this means that there was a represented democracy but due to limited community involvement, only 35 aristocrats in the main political posts, it can hardly be coined as a democratic society. Whereas, in comparison, Athenian society had the people's assembly consisting of 500 male-citizens, directly involved with council and magistrate decisions allowing an everyday communal input on political and war-time decision. Due to exclusion of women politically speaking and slave ownership, in both cultures, Athenians still had some of their own flaws, but more closely represented what we see today from modern democracy.
The political atmosphere of Classical Athens was one to behold on a global scale. A style government that had not been so much as thought of anywhere else in the world was flourishing in the powerful polis, and proved to be the backbone of its success in the ancient world. Democracy did away with the tyrants, monarchs, and oligarchs of the past and instead offered a voice to every man in the state who so chose to participate. Many cities of the ancient world would shudder at the thought of offering a voice to commoners, and even the poverty stricken; but the Athenian mindset was prideful in the notion that any citizen of the great city was competent enough to take part in civil discourse and furthermore
Mckeon, Richard. "The Interpretation of Political Theory and Practice in Ancient Athens." Journal of the History of Ideas, 42.1 (1981): 3-12.
Democracy (“rule by the people” when translated) comes from the Greek language. In ancient Greece, where popular government first appeared around 500 B.C., these systems were called democracies. (Dahl, 78) Those called “democracies” in classical antiquity advocates in both theory and practice of becoming modern democracies. Since the end of Cold War era, the modern civilizations strive to create, or preserve democracy as one of the ultimate ideals. (Shah) Accordingly, a number of democracies have flowered in East Asia, Eastern Europe, and South America and enough have floundered to spark a vigorous debate about what it takes to create a lasting liberal order.(Patten, 1) Even the Middle East – the Arab World is slightly on the road to democratizing since the Arab Spring. How does democracy happen? In this essay, I would like to focus on the fundamental principles of democracy according to the Schmitter and Karl’s article “What Democracy Is … and Is Not”, and would like to examine the emergence of democracy according to the article “Economic Development and Democracy” by Seymour Martin Lipset, “Bowling Alone” by Robert Putnam and “Why Democracies Survive” by Larry Diamond.
So, was ancient Athens a democracy? Some would argue that it isn’t, but I believe that it in fact is. It has many parts of it that makes it not one, but the proof that
The word democracy derives from two Greek words; ‘demos’ which means ‘the people’ and ‘kratein’ which means to rule. Democracy is defined as a government, by and for the people because ‘power is not of a minority but of the whole people’ (Thucydides). Originally democracy meant rule by the common people. In the sense, and even before the beginning of modern class society, it was very much a social class affair. This meant that power should be in the hands of the largest class: the poorest, least educated and those without land or property. As a result, democracy was feared and rejected by the educated, cultured and wealthy. In classical Greece, democracy was seen by the liberal and the educated as one of the worst types of government and society imaginable and often thought of as a ‘bad word’. The rule of the people was regarded as a threat to all the cherished values of a civilized orderly society.
The biggest difference between Athenian democracy and all other democracies is that the Athenian version was a direct democracy rather than representative. It would seem the kind of direct democracy that Athens had might lead to anarchy at the worst and arbitrary decisions or unstable policies at the least. Both ancient and modern democratic experiments have shown that the will of the people sometimes is undeceive, changing to and fro with every rhetorical wind that blows. Yet, as surprising as it may seem, Athenian d...