The notion being portrayed in source one is that a portion of hybridization is and always will be beneficial to one’s culture. This is shown in the source by the phrase of “In some ways, hybridization always makes a culture better.” Multiple examples of hybridization is shown on this source, such as the development of blues and jazz was a result of the mixture of African and European modes of music. The author indirectly states that blues and jazz was one of the most important forms of art of the modern world, which supports the idea of hybridization being the pinnacle of one’s culture. The source also states that the English is the result of combining the French and German languages. With this in mind, English is the second most spoken language …show more content…
With the growing number of English speaking persons, there would be a lesser degree of misunderstanding, which can have detrimental effects. The textbook definition of globalization is “the process that is making the world’s citizens increasingly interdependent economically, politically, environmentally, and technologically.” This source relates to the theme of globalization because of the fact that everyone around the world has heard some form of blues and jazz, and has spoken / heard about the English language. Governments can then further increase the rate of hybridization by integrating foreign aspects into their culture, which will “always make a culture better.” The writer of this quote states that hybridization is a very important aspect in making one’s culture …show more content…
These sources are displaying the positives and negatives of what it means to have globalization a factor in their society. This statement is supported by the fact that source one is stating that “hybridization always makes a culture better,” and source two stating that Canadian companies merging with American companies will have a factor into them losing their national identity and the last source depicting a form of Canada hybridizing with other countries.
Source one is stating that hybridization is a positive thing whereas the second source is portraying that mixing with other factors is a negative thing. Source one believes that hybridization is the pinnacle of making a culture better in contrast to the couple talking in source two stating that the merging of companies will make them lose their national identity. Source two displays a couple shopping at an American multinational retailing corporation also known as Walmart and source three depicts a flag with other flags embedded onto it. With Walmart being a multinational corporation and Canada being a multinational country. These two sources complement each other in the way that they have contradicting ideas. The second source is stating that hybridizing can affect one’s national identity negatively whereas source three states that having multiple different factors is what
This leads to the negative viewpoint of cultural globalization, that “[it] can lead to a utopian world, [and] some believe it will cause less dominant cultures to be obliterated and economically developed cultures to prosper.” (Issit 1). Although the dominance of English allows for people to speak a common language many can understand, a downside would be losing knowledge of other cultures.
For years, English was the dominant language of the United States. Now, demographers are predicting that in the year 2030, English language scholars will only be approximately 40% of the schools population in the United States. California has already surpassed that amount; 60% to 70% of the students speak a language other than English for their main language. Many think that Hispanics is the fastest growing group, in the United States, but they are actually the second highest, next to the Asian population.
It would be very boring to be around the different nationalities who all speak the same languages. By having different languages here it'll help us learn more about the person and where they're from. It can show us where it came from and learn more about the culture behind different nationalities languages. Now if we all speak the same languages we basically be different only in our nationalities than us all speaking english. Whereas if we spoke a different language it would make us be more eager to want get a better understanding of the person and they language the
...he private day-to-day life of people. They can choose to speak in any language at their home. Having English as an official language helps immigrants as English is spoken by most of the people in the world. English as an official language promotes unity among people but not differences. In conclusion, we can say that having English as the official language has more pros than cons.
Regardless of the confusion possibilities between both languages, the benefits will only minimize the disadvantage and maximize the advantages. Generally speaking, English holds the biggest market in the world. I think people in the U.S. should speak, read, and write in English fluently to be able to survive in a foreign country. The fluency of one living in the states should be about being able to communicate with one another, because English not only will bring one a surprising amount of benefits, but also the bilingual knowledge to surpass others that only know one language.... ... middle of paper ...
Hybridization is commonly defined as the interbreeding of genetically differentiated populations, where the gene flow between the two species has been reestablished. This process is more likely to happen in recently diverged populations that have a secondary contact, in which the isolation barrier has been removed. Hybridization can lead to a variety of evolutionary outcomes, depending on the fitness of the hybrids relative to the parental forms. Some of them will be beneficial, such as the effects of maintaining or increasing diversity through stable hybrid zones, the rescue of small inbred populations, the origin and transfer of adaptations, the reinforcement of reproductive isolation, and the formation of new hybrid lineages (Todesco, 2016). In the other hand, hybridization can also reduce diversity through the breakdown of reproductive barriers, leading to the merger of previously distinctive evolutionary lineages, and the extinction of populations or species.
... globalization, especially in a cultural sense, almost contradict themselves. "Globalization" is a complex phenomenon, uniquely marked with two opposing forces. On one hand, it is characterized by massive economic expansion and technological innovation. On the other hand, there is an increased inequality, cultural and social turmoil, and individual alienation.
process of interaction and integration amongst the companies, governments and people of different nations, operating on an international scale. Many people around the world are questioning the impact of globalisation on their personal identity, specifically their culture - the ideas, practices and social behaviour of a particular group of people or a society. Cultural globalisation refers to the transmission of ideas, meanings and values globally in a way that includes and intensifies social relations. There are many different perspectives on whether cultural globalisation leads to a more positive or negative impact for people worldwide and in this essay, I will be examining
Global culture can be described as a type of hybridization as different societies adopt the ideals of others, making what is global more local (Storey, 2005). What is global can be seen in our fashion sense, our cuisine and what we watch on television (Storey, 2005). For many countries, it is a type of Americanisation, the imposing of western ideals onto native or indigenous cultures, making the western ideals the new local. Storey says “what is exported always finds itself in the context of what already exists” (2003, p.112).
Before we dive into the "waters" of our problem, we must first examine the "waters", or meaning of our problem, which we are jumping into. As defined in the Merriam Webster Dictionary, globalize is a transitive verb meaning "to make global; especially: to make worldwide in scope or application". Rosenau describes globalization as "rendering boundaries and identity with the land less salient" So, by process of globalization, he is suggesting that the world would become homogenous with all countries sharing a number of similar characteristics, thus robbing many nations and cultures of specific heritage and traditions. The less complicated, but equally powerful example used in the first paragraph of Article 2 is the example of "a McDonald's on every corner". Though this may not seem as serious to some, it is still a form of globalization, which can slowly destroy the culture of individual nations.
...the American dream and western way of life is being forced upon cultures all around the world. These large communications companies hold the power over information and culture and act as the catalyst in the process of the homogenization of global cultures thus creating a one-world culture. This movement towards cultural homogeneity does not come without the elimination or eradication of heterogeneity (Zhang, 48). The amalgamation of cultures into one western Americanized culture does not allow for the celebration of cultural differences or promote the uniqueness of traditional cultures. Globalization and development is based on the idea that in order for countries to prosper they must become like the western world, more specifically America, and this ideology has destroyed cultures globally and created a McWorld where faster, cheaper, bigger and western is better.
It is very advantageous for anyone to become multilingual, as there are many opportunities available in the area. In some cases, learning English means better jobs and a better understanding of the world around you. It means having a voice in the world. Thousands of immigrants to the U.S. as well as people worldwide strive to learn English daily. Most students in today's colleges worldwide are studying to become multilingual (Ferrell and Hotz 6).
Experiencing those days where people would laugh at other for the broken English; the grammar and pronunciation are the toughest parts of the language. People with English as a second language always stumble upon difficulties; however, the determination of learning a new language do not decrease easily as the motivation is still surrounding one’s mind. Today, English has become an international communication; even the teaching and learning of the language has already spread throughout the world. English is known as one of the most common use language and has been offering classes everywhere for years especially around Asia; additionally, the world common language has now become the number one language uses in every fields of career that is being offer everywhere. Non-American students should be required to take English class as a second language in school
Culture has a power to overcome boundaries and even conquer distances by migrating and interfering in foreign cultures, and doing so it can lead to homogenization- where this main characteristic unifies culture making it global and model for everyone. First, as a definition, globalization implies deep and fast interconnection with global countries all around the world, and technological changes made that interconnection possible and created more support for a homogenizing
According to the native of Newton, Mass (2014), the Language is of the utmost importance in all aspects of a culture, it is how we write laws, and how we share values and how we communicate with each other. In order to understand other cultures around the globe, we need to be open-minded and then learn the languages out there. When people share the same language, it is very easy to recognize and help each other. To give you an example, “I had the opportunity to study in Canada for one year and a half, and I can affirm that there is no more pleasurable experience when you help someone sharing the same code, same langue (language) (“Macmillan”, 2016)”. In addition, “a person who speaks multiple languages has a stereoscopic vision of the world from two or more perspectives, enabling them to be more flexible in their thinking, reading more easily. Multilingual, therefore, are not restricted to a single world-view, but also have a better understanding that other outlooks are possible” (Cook, 2001). To summarize, it is due this exchange of life experience and thanks to multilingualism that people improve the cultural understanding about the place they go, increasing the numbers of new global citizens in all nations. Furthermore, “works of art and popular culture are mostly represented in the native language. Listening to a song, reading a classic novel, watching a movie -- these are