More handpicked essays just for you.
Explain legal and ethical issues arising from confidentiality
Explain legal and ethical issues arising from confidentiality
Explain legal and ethical issues arising from confidentiality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Discussion that takes puts inside the connection of a protected relationship, for example, that between a lawyer and a client, a spouse and wife, a minister and contrite, and a physician physician and patient. The law frequently ensures against constrained exposure of such discussions. Be that as it may, there are special cases that can refute an advantaged correspondence, and there are different circumstances where it can be waived, either deliberately or accidentally.
Those announcements made by a client to his advice or lawyer, or physician, in certainty, identifying with some reason Or activity then pending or in consideration. Such interchanges can't be unveiled without the assent of the client. In legal transactions, the law permits individuals to decline to reveal the substance of certain special discussions and works. Interchanges between a lawyer and a client, spouse and wife, minister and contrite, and physician and patient are all special. In a couple of states, the benefit reaches out to a psychotherapist and client and to a journalist and her source.
…show more content…
Such correspondences can't be unveiled without the assent of the client. In legal transactions, the law permits individuals to decline to uncover the substance of certain advantaged discussions and compositions. Interchanges between a lawyer and client, spouse and wife, pastor and contrite, and physician and patient are all favored. In a couple of states, the benefit stretches out to a psychotherapist and client and to a columnist and her
Additionally, it expressed that deciding in Redmond’s favor will ultimately serve the public’s interest, as this hearing would set a precedent for similar cases in the future. The association further asserted that clients’ who confide with therapists expect that their revelations will remain private, and it is this trust that fosters the open communication that doctors need to heal patients. The APA felt that, at the end of the day, confidentiality outweighed any other matter at hand. They also believed that judges’ jurisdiction to decide confidentially matters individually did not provide the protection that patients needed to feel safe revealing potentially incriminating, but critical, information.
Over the course of their therapeutic relationship, Dr. Davenport violates client confidentiality as it is described by the American Counseling
As a psychologist in a mental health profession, you should avoid conflicts of interest when providing any professional services to a client. Engaging in any activity with a client that makes the boundary between a provider and a client somewhat un...
They argue that therapists should consider their own motivation to self-disclose and set boundaries. The therapists should never put their own needs above the client. They make sure to point out that self discourse alone cannot affect the outcome of treatment. Self-disclosure is effective only if it is used appropriately and only if it is used when it is necessary. The amount of information disclosed and when it is disclosed is also important. Therapists should draw a clear line with the amount of intimacy to include in their therapeutic disclosure to ensure that no inappropriate boundaries are crossed. The authors suggest two rules of thumb to follow when disclosing information which include: (a) “Why do I want to say what I am about to say” and (b) “What will be the likely impact of the client” (p. 567).
standard 22- all consultations between human service professional are kepth private unless to do so would results in harm to clients or communities.
Through my research I was able to understand just how important trust is to the nurse-client relationship, and in turn made sure to create a bond of trust between myself and the client in my therapeutic interaction. According to Arnold & Boggs (2011) components of communication, such as an open exchange of information, can have a big hand in the formation of trust. Because of this reflection I was sure to include an open exchange of information in my interaction, avoiding having the patient do the vast majority of the talking, but also being careful to adhere to appropriate self-disclosure. It is indicated that due to the status of the nursing profession, people tend to easily put a trust into nurses; Hertzberg (1988) and Lagnespetz (1992) say “trust appears to be extended to the nurse by the patient unless the nurse does something to break or damage this covenant” (as cited in Rutherford, 2014, p. 285). This caused me to carefully analyze my interaction, and ask myself is any of my words or actions could possibly be perceived by the client in such a manner that would damage the covenant of trust. It is especially important to avoid damaging the bond of trust between a nurse and their patient all together as opposed to understanding how to
...f dual relationship there was also a possibility of the client becoming dependant on the therapist which could be seen as unethical by the BACP (2010).
Ruddy, N. B., Borresen, D. A., & Gunn Jr., W. B. (2008). Colocating with medical professionals: A new model of integrated care. In The collaborative psychotherapist: Creating reciprocal relationships with medical professionals (pp.115–133). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Communication involves the exchange of information between two or more people. Whether verbal or nonverbal, communication serves as the bridge that allows people to share ideas and thoughts. Clinical professionals converse with patients, relatives, and other professionals daily. Conversely, despite having multiple encounters with patients every day, physicians fail to enact the necessary communication and interpersonal skills to effectively listen, instill confidence, and promote following medical advice in patients.
This paper will explore the concept of dual relationships between counselors and clients and the ethical implications of such relationships. In addition to presenting several examples of dual relationships, this paper will also explore how ethical decisions must be made to avoid potentially harmful or exploitive relationships in therapy as well understanding how different interactions between counselor and clients can be understood from an ethical standpoint, as well as how reviewing these ethical dilemmas may shape my future career as a counselor.
The writer discusses a situation of the doctor failing to disclose the nature of important medical condition which can jeopardize several of the patient’s family members and puts the doctor at odds with them. The problem is also discussed by Sutrop (2011) who show how protecting the patient’s confidentiality and self- decision capacity has actually caused severe hindrances to the field of scientific development and research.
Over the past fifteen years, researchers have acknowledged that the revealing of personal secrets through talking and writing can lead to a variety of health benefits, in view of the fact that the opportunity allows the secret holder to openly express the clandestine information with another. This prospect not only allows the individual the opportunity to relieve themselves of the pressure of the emotional burden, but also the chance to come to terms with the concealment of their secrets.
Similarly, for the treatment to be done in the best and safest way possible there are certain duties expected from patients too. They include: patient’s intimacy with doctor so as to open his heart andaccept the medical procedures some of which might sound inherently undesirable. Razi put forth several real-life clinical instances of the hazards of inadequate patient-doctor intimacy. It could cause the concealment of patient’s secrets, increasing pain and even death. With this regard Razi narrated an
One strong argument here is during the times of terminal illness. It is natural for the healthcare team to discuss information with the family in terms of how the patient is doing. In such time like responding to an inquiring spouse, the requirements of confidentiality are difficult to achieve. Generally, it is unethically and unjustifiable to discuss any information without the permission of the patient. Nevertheless, it is still the obligation of the patient to inform the spouse about the status of health and any information related to the diagnosis.
In this case, the psychologist is presented with several ethical issues which could cause harm to the client. The first ethical issue that arose in this case is the potential for a role conflict. The psychologist and Mr. Hartwig had contact prior to the development of a therapeutic relationship when the psychologist bought a car from Mr. Hartwig. It may not be enough that the brief, informal relationship ended. The psychologist must assess the dimensions of the previous relationship from the viewpoint of the client as well as his/her own personal feelings (Koocher & Keith-Spiegel, 2008). For example, the client could feel that he gave the psychologist a good deal and that the psychologist was indebted to him. This could leave the psychologist vulnerable to being manipulated by the client. Or, what if the car broke down? This could leave the psychologist feeling cheated and resulted in hostile feelings toward the client. The psychologist has an ethical responsibility to examine both relationships for role incompatibility prior to forming a therapeutic relationship. The psychologist seemed to be aware that there was the potential role conflict resulting from their initial meeting, and he acted ethically by attempting to refer Mr. Hartwig to a Psychology Registry.