Arthur Miller: The Crucible and Allegorical McCarthyism

900 Words2 Pages

Repeating History: Mankind’s Downfall “He is a storyteller, a man with a marvelous memory, a simple man with a capacity for wonder, concerned with people and ideas” (The Paris Review). He is Arthur Miller. Born on October 17, 1915, Miller entered the world in Harlem, New York City. At age nineteen Miller wrote his first play. His passion for playwrights led him into the theater world inevitably leading him to meeting and marrying his second wife, Marilyn Monroe. Miller wrote the play, The Crucible, as an allegory of McCarthyism. Unlike most of his plays, The Crucible, was a dramatized historical play. In a interview, Miller stated that, with this play he “ was completely freed by the period [he] was writing about [...] It was a different diction, …show more content…

It was the the mid-1950s. Although World War Two ended, the effects of war still lingered within countries. Tension built, from the rapidly expanding Soviet Union to the seemingly converting Italians, paranoia of communism grew. All it took was one brash but passionate man to escalate Americans into a frenzy. This man was not Mao Zedong, who rose to power in China, converting the formidable country to communism. No, his name was Senator Joseph McCarthy. Citizens of America walked around with a ticking bomb looming over their heads, all it took was one accusation of communism for it to explode. No one was safe. Even Miller himself in 1956 was interrogated by the House of Representatives' Committee on Un-American Activities. Refusing to identify others present at meetings he had, Miller was convicted of Contempt of Congress. The once victorious country fell into the McCarthyism spell. It was the second wave of the “Red Scare.” The play, The Crucible, by Arthur Miller is a tragedy published in 1953. This dramatized play was based on the Salem Witch Trials that took place during the late 1600s. Although the play does hold some truth it is partially fictionalized. The interesting composition creates an intugine development of the intent of the play. Fiction is written for the emotions, to evoke a response from the reader. On the other hand, …show more content…

Miller asserts his opinion on this state of frenzy alluding his current deposition when writing the play, the Red Scare to the Salem Witch Trials, proving that history repeats itself. I discovered my heart truth in Miller’s use of the Salem Witch Trials for the setting, allowing him to incorporate meaningful symbols, develop characters, and create irony; as a result, I saw the rudimentaries of human nature revealed as when fear evoking threats loom over a society, humans must decide how much one is willing to sacrifice to obtain control. Every society has their “buzzwords” that evoke fear driving people to be compliant pawns and frenzy that creates mob mentality. Ultimately, expectations of society ruins innocent souls and the path to diverge from societal expectations garners a plethora of

Open Document