Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Balancing work life and home life
Balancing work life and home life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Arlie Hochschild challenged the traditional family construct in 1989 with her idea of the “second shift.” In her book, The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home, Hochschild describes the working woman in terms of the responsibilities--beyond her occupation--which she assumes in the home. However, society has changed since Hochschild, making it easy to question if the concept of the second shift is still applicable. In an article from the National Science Foundation, Chore Wars: Men, Women and Housework, Bobbie Mixon creates a present day representation of the extra housework women undertake compared to men. Unlike Hochschild, Mixon compares married and unmarried couples as well as couples without children; his concept …show more content…
provides a new view on the Hochschild’s “second shift.” Hochschild compiled a mountain of evidence in order to display the vast difference in housework between working mothers and their working husbands; from her findings, Hochschild emphasized how the second shift affected mothers.
In 1986, two-thirds of all mothers were in the workforce, two-thirds of which worked full-time. Beyond the job, however, women spent an entire month a year on average devoted to housework (Hochschild 1989). Hochschild compared mothers to their male counterparts to display their difference in time spent beyond work. While women were often responsible for daily task such as cooking and getting the children ready for school, men were responsible for less daunting tasks. Men were often responsible for chores unconstrained by time--repairing appliances, changing the car oil, gardening--as they could be put off until tomorrow if need be. Similarly, Hochschild pointed out the inequality in the desirability of parent responsibilities. While mothers were often responsible for housework in general, fathers were able to invest the majority of their time into childrearing. With their cyclical routine of tiresome housework, it was no wonder that women in the 1980s felt they were working a second …show more content…
shift. Mixon takes a similar approach as Hochschild, along the lines of the second shift, but instead focuses on what is defined as “core chores,” or the undesirable chores like washing dishes, vacuuming, and doing laundry.
Mixon’s data show that, although the amount of hours spent on core chores doubled for men since 1976 and women’s hourly investment decreased by nearly a third, core chores still consume four more hours of women’s time than men’s. Mixon also compared the hours of housework between both genders and marital status, but with no children; his results display that men actually work an hour less after marriage while women work seven hours more per week (Mixon 2008). Mixon’s findings display integral trends between genders; while men are working more and women are working less, there still remains a vast difference between their responsibilities. Although trends may suggest that gender differences in housework are lessening over time, women are still working the second shift.
The idea of the second shift--though to a lesser extent--is still very prominent in today’s society. Women continue to work harder than men, regardless of the amount of children either have. While egalitarian relationships are becoming common, such a distinct contrast between genders is a shocking find. As the idea of the second shift illustrates, it is degrading to women to be expected to hold the majority of the household slack after a hard day’s work. These degrading expectations are a blatant
form of gender inequality. Hochschild’s idea of the second shift was brought into light several years ago but remains a large part of today’s society, as Mixon has shown. Although women and men have begun to bridge the gap between the amount of housework shared in the home, women still assume the majority of the responsibility. Women disproportionately perform the everyday chores of married life, although many work full-time jobs alongside their husbands. With numbers so obviously unjust, it is a wonder how the gender inequality that coexists with the second shift is in its third decade since its definition.
At what point does work life start interfering with family life to an extent that it becomes unacceptable? Is it when you don’t get to spend as much time with your family as you would like, or is it the point where you barely get to see your family due to long hours at work? Is it even possible to balance work with family life? Anne-Marie Slaughter, the author of “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All”, believes this balance is impossible to achieve in this day and age. In contrast, Richard Dorment, the author of “Why Men Still Can’t Have It All”, believes that there will never be a day when someone will have it all, certain sacrifices will always have to be made. Both of these articles are similar in the respect that they both examine balancing a demanding career with raising children. The two authors’ views on the subject differ greatly, especially regarding how gender roles have a significant impact on our society.
College degrees, jobs, and income stream are all quantifiable items, however, a gauge on work-life balance, parenting abilities, and dedication at home cannot be measured by a number. In the past, men have been viewed as the backbone of the family. The typical day consists of getting up the earliest, going to work, coming home late at night, maybe missing out on trivial matters, but ultimately paying the bills. As time progresses, roles in households have shifted significantly. Now more than ever women are extremely active in the workforce, local communities, and politics. The obstacles faced by men and women are inherently different, but men seem to fall under an intensified microscope when it comes to intertwining family life with a career. Richard Dorment dives deep into these issues in his piece, "Why Men Still Can't Have It All." Although the argument may seem bias in favoring the rigorous lifestyle of men, the
The Cult of Domesticity is an offensive gesture; however in the 1950s’ there was validity this gesture. The rise of feminism has created a society in which there are more single mothers than ever before, long side more children born out of wedlock. The United States Census Bureau states, “During the 1960-2016 period, the percentage of children living with only their mother nearly tripled from 8 to 23 percent and the percentage of children…” (1). The article the Cult of Domesticity indeed points out the valid flaws of Ideal duties/expectations of domesticity in the 1950s’; however, I would like to state that anything man-made idea or material mechanism is not without faults. The agreeable points of the list were that there should be a genuine respect and act of service shown to our husbands each day. However, the list made a hard-left turn in suggesting that women are not to question the motives of their husband, and/or the location of their husbands if they chose to be late after work. Lastly, if husbands choose to
Working women with families are often lead to inhabit several different lives all at once. In article “The Second Shift,” Arlie Hochschild discusses how women who have families and work are often subjected to having to stay a full time housewife along with their job, creating basically two sets of work, as the author calls it, the Second Shift. I think that the authors’s style of using many studies and examples helps to strengthen his points. Although he doesn’t directly express his opinion of the issue as much which weakens it to an extent but also helps to have the reader form their own opinion using the issues discussed. His use of vocabulary helps to express his opinion onto the issues discussed as it shows to be more sophisticated whenever he writes on supporting his own side of the issue. Hochschild doesn’t wait to get to the point when discussing the topics. He uses many studies and facts to help argue his points and is used efficiently, but also in a way it’s also ineffective as the lack of studies and facts that have used that would even try to support the other side of the discussion. I agree to the author's argument of how even families should continue evolving along side with the economy, to help couples to support one another as equals, rather then opposites with specific assignments.
From the very beginning of history, women were portrayed to be insignificant in comparison to men in society. A woman was deemed by men to be housewives, bear children and take care of the household chores. Even so, at a young age girls were being taught the chores they must do and must continue through to adulthood. This idea that the woman’s duty was to take charge of household chores was then passed through generations, even to this day. However, this ideology depends on the culture and the generation mothers were brought up in and what they decide to teach their daughters about such roles.
Even Though women have revolutionized themselves in relation to the world many other aspects of society have not. This phenomenon, originally coined by Arielle Hochschild in her book The Second Shift, is known as the stalled revolution. In essence while female culture has shifted male culture has not. This has created an unequal, unfair and oppressive atmosphere for women across the nation. The title of Hochschild's book tells it all. The second shift refers to the second shift of work women are and have been burdened with at home. Although they have made enormous leaps within the economy and workforce their gender roles at home and within society remain the same. Male culture and their ideas of female gender roles have not progressed. As a result needs of females have not been met. Working mothers today work more than any other demographic, a rough estimate of this comes out to be a whole extra month of work consisting of twenty four hour work days.
One thing my grandma would always say every time she was doing work around the house is that, “A woman’s work is never done.” Posted on an online magazine website author, Jessica Grose, wrote an article titled “Cleaning: The Final Feminist Frontier,” published March 13th, 2013. As she got into the article she argues that men in our lives more recently started taking on more of the childcare and cooking, while the cleaning still falls unfairly on women. Jessica Grose starts to build her credibility with personal facts and using reputable sources.
In his essay, published in They Say / I Say, “Why Men Still Can’t Have It All,” Richard Dorment, armed with facts found in surveys of millions of Americans, argues that men fully support their household responsibilities. Over the past 70 years, there has been a significant shift in the work-life balances of both men and women. In that time, men were the breadwinners in America, and that they would do all the work with a woman at home raising the children. This view has changed drastically since the 1960s, as now men and women are both in the workplace and tasked with a balance of work and family-raising. In his essay, Richard Dorment takes on the argument that men don't do their parts equally in their households armed with facts found in surveys of millions of Americans. Although popular belief tends to lean towards a reality
Dempsey, K. (1997). Women’s Perception of Fairness and the Persistence of an Unequal Division of Housework. Family Matters, 2(48), 1-11.
She brings up statistics of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics quoting that 55% of mothers that also work full time go home and do some housework on an average day, while only 18% of full time employed fathers do some housework on an average day (1). Grose then furthers her point by adding that “even in the famously gender neutral Sweden, women do 45 minutes more housework a day than their male partners” (2). Another statement that strengthened Grose’s argument was from her interview with David Michael Perez (publisher and editor of Kindling Quarterly) that even if a man does more decorating and cleaning (as he does), the wife will receive the reward or credit
Throughout history, the roles of men and women in the home suggested that the husband would provide for his family, usually in a professional field, and be the head of his household, while the submissive wife remained at home. This wife’s only jobs included childcare, housekeeping, and placing dinner on the table in front of her family. The roles women and men played in earlier generations exemplify the way society limited men and women by placing them into gender specific molds; biology has never claimed that men were the sole survivors of American families, and that women were the only ones capable of making a pot roast. This depiction of the typical family has evolved. For example, in her observation of American families, author Judy Root Aulette noted that more families practice Egalitarian ideologies and are in favor of gender equality. “Women are more likely to participate in the workforce, while men are more likely to share in housework and childcare (apa…).” Today’s American families have broken the Ward and June Cleaver mold, and continue to become stronger and more sufficient. Single parent families currently become increasingly popular in America, with single men and women taking on the roles of both mother and father. This bend in the gender rules would have, previously, been unheard of, but in the evolution of gender in the family, it’s now socially acceptable, and very common.
Today, in a vast majority of families, both the wife and husband have a job. Many working parents are under stress as they have to try to balance the demands of their work, children and relationship. Over the past 25 years, women's and men's roles have changed dramatically. In fact, the world of work and home are not separate, research indicates a profound impact on work and home life.
Gender is defined as the scopes of genetic, physical, mental and behaviour characteristics pertaining to, and differentiating between, masculinity and feminity, meanwhile inequality is defined as in a situation where there is an unfair situation or treatment in which certain people have more privileges or better opportunities or chances than other people. Thus, from the definition stated gender inequality refers to unequal or unfair management, treatment, or perceptions of persons or individuals are based on their gender. In a parallel sense, gender inequality can be said as the world in which there was discrimination against anyone based on gender. In this introductory, the general understanding of gender inequalities will be discussed further into three significant factors that influence the allocation of housework between men and women. Household chores can be classified as cleaning, cooking and paying bills. Division of housework serves as an important element in the continuation of the function of a family and it requires contribution from both spouses (Tang, 2012). However, current society’s perception on housework is based on gender, so the three major factors that influence the division of household chores within the couples are education level, economic resources, and time availability (refer to Figure1 in Appendix 1).
More and more women work outside and inside the home. The double demands shouldered by these women pose a threat to their physical health. Whether you are an overworked housewife or an exhausted working mother the chances are that you are always one step behind your schedule. No matter how hard women worked, they never ended up with clean homes. Housewives in these miserable circumstances often became hysterical cleaners. They wore their lives away in an endless round of scouring, scrubbing, and polishing. The increased strain in working women comes from the reality that they carry most of the child-rearing and household responsibilities. According to social trends (1996), women always or usually do the washing in 79 percent of cases and decide the menu 59 percent of the time. Picking up the children at school or doing grocery shopping are just a few of the many typical household-tasks a woman takes on every day.
As previously stated, the ideology behind separation of spheres focuses on the fact that women had no choice in adhering to their responsibilities – it was simply required for family stability and maintenance. Similarly, the implicit reference to the second shift emphasized the intensive responsibility for women, as men did not consider it their given duty to take care of domestic labour and child-rearing. Men’s responsibility hardly changes, if at all; if men do help out, it is in occasional and voluntary manner, never because they need to. Moreover, both of these concepts have a patriarchal connotation and reflect rising inequality of women, since men are somehow superior in the choices they are given/willing to take. This perception renders back to when the separation of spheres begun, as previously men shared housework and responsibility of nurturing the children. The allocation of duties implied a control-obey relationship between man and woman, where the man chose his priorities and the woman did not have a choice. This ideology passed through the years, even when the second shift was introduced. Even when women operated in competitive fields alongside men, they were expected to go back to their homes and fulfill their duties of a