Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The strengths and weaknesses in aristotle nicomachean ethics book one
Topics in aristotle's nicomachean ethics
Topics in aristotle's nicomachean ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1. Money is both a necessary and useful instrument for justice in society because it establishes a proportional form of exchange, it acts as a medium to mediate exchange and enable supply and demand between people of different avocations thus promoting justice in society as well prompting injustice in society.
2. Money being necessary and a useful instrument for justice in society is relevant to the individual person because money allows and “guarantees” the individual to purchase and sell amongst dissimilar persons establishing a relationship through a universal mean of exchange. Without money as a form of measure an individual would be unable to trade what he has with what he needs if the other person assigned no value to what he had to trade, thus making the individual unequal to another individual. Inequality is unjust and unjust is unlawful. Money being necessary and a useful instrument for justice in society is relevant to society because money is needed for exchange amongst people that make up society. If the citizens of the society are communal in exchange through the means of money then the society flourishes through equality. As Aristotle states, ”For in that way there will always be exchange, and if there is exchange there is a community. Thus, money acts like a measure: it makes goods commensurable and equalizes them. For just as there is no community without exchange, there is no exchange without equality and no equality without commensurability. (NE 1133b15-17)”
3. Money is a necessity but it has been made clear in recent years that it is no longer an instrument for justice in society but an instrument of injustice in today’s society as money has been unevenly distributed in excess. The US economy is demonstrating...
... middle of paper ...
...exchange. Money makes exchange among dissimilar people commensurable. Aristotle argues that exchange occur out of two conditions: mutual need, “That it is a need which holds the parties together as if they were one single unit is shown by the fact that there is no exchange when one or both parties do not stand in need of the other” (NE 1133b6-10) and diversity of individuals, “For a community is not formed by two physicians, but by physician and a farmer, and, in general, by people who are different and unequal. But they must be equalized; and hence everything that enters into an exchange must somehow be comparable. (NE 1133a16-20). Money as a means of measurement between unequal people and their products makes it an important part of justice. It presents an artificial equality that can allow political justice to advance.
Works Cited
aristotle nicomachean ethics
Money is something that can either be used for the greater good of society, or it can be contorted into something that is detrimental to society, it all depends on whose hands that money happens to fall into. Human tendencies begin to change once people come to have money, the lavish and selfish lifestyle begins. Entitlement comes with having money because money gives people what they want which makes people think they are entitled to get everything they want. In The Great Gatsby Fitzgerald portrays that money is the root of all problems with can ultimately lead to loneliness and careless behavior.
Money is sweeter than honey but can be destructive. It simplifies a man’s life while a lack of it confines him in the streets of poverty. It raises his social status while an absence of it leaves him unnoticed. It gives him a feeling of superiority and importance among others, while a shortage of it makes him worthless
...with the person that refused to use his labor. The appearance of money played an important role in the mankind's evolution. Money, in some ways, inspired men to work harder and harder to claim and enlarge his wealth then one's labor would incite others contribution to the nonstop progression and development of human beings. That one's wealth is estimated upon the combination of their mind and labor, diligence and creativeness, bravery and desires .... has become the formula for our success in this competitive world. Definitely, the inequalities of wealth are natural and inevitable.
While the idea of money as being so important in daily life in the modern era is not a concept that is given much thought, it is very important to realize that this is not exactly a new concept. It was as important during the medieval period in the time of Saint Francis of Assisi. Wealth, in many cases of modern times and medieval is seen as both the main factor for running the world as well as its downfall. It is something that no matter the period we as humans understand and use to classify the world in both abstract and in more literal ways.
It is also believed that wealth should be non-existent. This is only possible if cl...
As the old saying goes, money is power. As the statistics show, some people have an insane amount of money, yet their fellow countrymen have close to nothing. In a struggling economy, unfair distribution of wealth can create real problems and unimaginable hardships for some people. For example, millions of people pay $2 for a bottle of designer water, while millions more live on less than $2 a day. If this is to one day change, wealthy people must adopt a much more magnanimous conviction towards their money.
... is sometimes unimaginable. It is one part of the everyday life that is evident to play one of the biggest roles in today’s society. Use of money can definitely result in negative consequences but also positive ones. Using the power of money, one can change countless lives stuck in poverty. Using the power of money, one can provide a living for oneself and a ray of hope in another’s life. Seeing a positive use of power as money, I help an approximate number of fifteen physically disable children in the care of the Salvation Army in India. Shocked by the state of their lives, I felt the need to make use of something in order to give hope to the children. Thus, with the power of money, I started donating regularly in the hope that, if not much, at least they may have the comfort of living properly.
There is one thing in this world that can really separate people, make them comment crimes, and make them completely change their entire outlook on life and that is money. The all mighty dollar is what they call it and it does a lot of good in this world but it can also cause a lot of pain and hurt. Everything we do in our lives revolves around money, what we do and what we don’t do. The real question though is does money really separate people in their daily lives drastically and if so how much does money play in our lives?
Note that \ari defines material goods as being everything whose value can be measured in money. This same definition will be used here, implying that the domain of material goods would include services, not just tangible items. Thus, the extent of which an individual values money is, in part, proportional to their value of material goods. Recalling \ari's definition for generosity, a relationship can be drawn on how a generous individual might value money given how they value material goods. The generous individual should value money as he does material goods, which is to be reasonably detached from it.
Money has evolved with the times and is a reflection of the progress of man. Early money was itself a physical commodity, grain, gold or silver. During the vital stage, more symbolic forms of money such as certificates of deposit, bank notes, checks, letters of credit, bonds and other forms of negotiable securities came into prominence. Social development transformed money in to a trust, “In God We Trust' it says on the back of the ten-dollar bill.” (The Ascent of Money, 27) Today money is faith in the person paying us and belief in the person issuing the money he uses or the institution that honors his money. This trust has no end it can be extended to a greater number of individuals.
Whatever your opinions are on the world, it can be certainly argued that this world runs on money. It’s what people work their whole lives to attain and even when it’s attained and one can live a suitable life with it, it’s still sought after as if it’s an endless chase of small victories. Money provides economic freedom and helps us achieve the products and services we want in life. The big question here is what should that money be able to buy? Should prostitution be legal? Should we be able to buy hitman to take away another souls life? These are the questions you have to ask when it comes to what money can buy and the morality behind it. I want to share my opinions on this topic because I believe that yes there are some lines that need to be drawn but for the most part, I am under the belief that money should be able to buy everything that you want as long as it doesn’t directly affect another human beings safety.
Aristotle’s thoughts on ethics conclude that all humans must have a purpose in life in order to be happy. I believe that some of the basics of his ideas still hold true today. This essay points out some of those ideas.
This essay seeks to examine the inequalities of distribution of resources and the defences of these inequalities provided by John Locke, in Of Property , and David Hume in Of Justice . Both writings set out the scene in which their theories would evolve. Locke starts with the idea that everything is held in common, and ownership is acquired through ones labour. Hume starts off with an illustration of a society where everybody has more than enough, and poses the question if we had more than enough what is the point of justice?
The invention of money was a major improvement in peoples’ lives. In the past, people usually had to travel all day to find the person who is willing to exchange their goods. In addition, the goods people want to exchange did not have the standard value of measurement. This led to unequal exchanges. Furthermore, it is not convenient to carry heavy goods from one place to another for an exchange. To solve these issues, money will be the only solution. Later, people tend to develop money from cowry shells to credit cards for the convenience and to improve their society.