Ariely's Perceptions Of Academic Dishonesty

2494 Words5 Pages

Honestly Lying
Dishonesty, A flaw of all humans that seems to have always existed. “By the age of three, children have told a lie or know the difference between a lie and the truth.” Examples of dishonesty such as something as little as wearing a counterfeit designer handbag to a fraud scheme taking place in the stock market. The following, all a form of dishonesty; lying, stealing, cheating, deceiving. Such thing have occurred and made known for over centuries. All of which ways affect someone in some type of way. No matter how strong one may think they stand morally, it still takes place. Reasons for doing ensue justifiable but it does not change the simple fact of what has taken place. This concept roots its evidence within the people …show more content…

All of the contributors are head of their education departments in their respected universities. The three authors in this study conducted an investigation among college students and their lack of academic integrity. The study took place in Taiwan and dealt strictly with Chinese education. In many ways, the studies are parallel. The fact that both studies took place on different sides of the world justifies Ariely’s claim, that it is something all humanity does and not just his surrounding environment.The study showed that there was no discrimination among gender or course major, all students knew of or took part in academic dishonesty. In the article the students not only admitted to academic dishonesty but gave reasoning behind it. Promotion was often a reason for academic dishonesty to transpire. The students simply did not want to fail. On top of that, students were opportunistic. If the chance to cheat arose they simply took advantage. The study also shows that the students in courses dealing with social sciences and business blamed it on insufficient ability. No one wants the feeling of fraudulence. Thus is a popular trait among humans. Convincingly Ariely does state that self promotion acts as a major factor towards lying. Data proved that when presented with a chance to improve one's self perception or value …show more content…

The Bible argues strictly against lying. By the law of the book, lying is a sin and is wrong. All humans are born containing a moral compass, knowing right from wrong and the truth and a lie, which points towards religion and a superior being. The Bible concurs Ariely’s claim that lying and dishonesty are wrong and speaks negatively concerning liars and deceivers. “the Lord detests lying lips but he delights in those who are trustworthy” (New International Version, Prov. 12: 22). Which leads to the fact that in the time period that the Bible was written liars existed. In addition the Bible says “ You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires...for he is a liar and the father of lies.” (New International Version, John 8:44). It gives both an assertion that people lie, and a theory for how the trait of dishonesty carried on towards all of humanity. God standing as the superior being over the universe completely detest the humanistic trait of lying and wants all of his children and followers to do the

Open Document