Arguments Against Standardized Testing

750 Words2 Pages

Standardized testing has a long history. Testing began in China in 2200 BC, where students took literary tests to determine their future (Dolezalek 24-25). Thousands of years later in America, immigrants took tests to determine where to place them in school to better integrate them (Dominique). In the 1930s, the first state assessment was formed. Dolezalek writes about the Iowa Every-Pupil Testing program that influenced other states to create standardized tests. Iowa started the testing trend, which really boomed in 1940. Seven years later the Educational Testing service was founded, which determined if students were admitted to college and if they received scholarships (27-28). Today, we use tests to compare students nationally and to rate …show more content…

Textbooks and tests are generally written by the same company, but fifty to eighty percent of the material on the tests is not in the textbook (Popham). With their game-like multiple-choice format, standardized tests are biased towards male students (“Standardized Tests - ProCon.org”). Standardized tests do not factor in the differences of intelligence in children. Some students have higher intrapersonal (within oneself) and interpersonal (between peers) intelligences than others but at the same time lack higher-level math skills (Popham). In addition to intelligences, standardized tests do not measure the qualities that make good and successful students, such as creativity, compassion, resilience, leadership, and integrity (“Standardized Tests - ProCon.org”).
Problems with standardized testing affect a wide range of people, from students and teachers to parents and school administrators. Teachers are usually rated based on how their students did on standardized tests, yet states are each allowed to create their own tests and scoring system (No Child Left Behind (2002) versus Every Student Succeeds). This allows teachers to be rated differently depending on which state they work

Open Document