Arguments Against Sport Hunting

243 Words1 Page

Hunting for sport is legal, and should remain that way. Many arguments against hunting for sport claim it is a “violent form of recreation” and “we have no right to take an animals life” for example, an opposing viewpoints article “Sport Hunting is an Unnecessary Form of Cruelty to Animals” says just that. HoweverI argue that we are part of this planet, as well as it’s ecosystem. We are (in ways) predators. An article on sport hunting, “Hunting for Sport” compares “hunters and the hunted” to a mountain lion and a deer. Is the lion at fault for hunting the deer? No. The mountain lion’s duty is to play the role as predator as well as keeping it’s prey’s population away from its ecosystems capacity. The ecosystem can no longer always support and control all animals populations. …show more content…

According to William Cohn, a conservation specialist, deer are “voracious eaters.” He also claims that if an area becomes too overpopulated with for example, deer, there will be a scarcity of food and lead to starvation.
Hunting for sport is already legal. Researching the topic on “NCSL.org” I found that hunting is legal in all areas of the United States as long as hunters follow the appropriate regulations. Most jurisdictions decide which specific seasons each year, is best appropriate for hunting in specific areas. These regulations prevent over-hunting according to my source, an article entitled “Hunting Regulations in the

More about Arguments Against Sport Hunting

Open Document