Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of social media on hiring
Impact of social media on hiring
Impact of social media on hiring
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of social media on hiring
Do you think it is a good decision to check employees social accounts so that you can get to know the personality of the person before hiring them? Well yes you should always check how the real person is versus just the professional one. Before someone gets hired, they should have a background check and look at how their sites look on the internet. Background checks are the best way to find out the real characteristics of the person applying. Owners must make sure they never had a criminal background, they have appropriate pictures, and has a good personality outside of the business. Profile Checking The first reason profile checking is good because you can find out all the information about this person. Background checking is best; it shows what type of person they are outside of the workplace. Getting to know the inspects of the person that you are about to hire. You could check on the internet for any information that you feel will be helpful. Checking if they had any drug-related crimes that made it hard to get any previous jobs. As Keller states “…which establishes parameters affecting the scope of a potential employer’s inquiries about prior arrests, convictions, and other aspects of the applicant’s criminal history.” (Harris, P. & Keller, …show more content…
If the applicant has inappropriate notes that may violate or get in the way of the job. As Harris states, “This assumes that individuals present their true self online, include pertinent details and do not list any misleading information.” (Harris, P. & Keller, K. 2005.Pg. 1) Social media always reflect on how the person may act. You can look at any social media sites that they may have, such as Facebook, Twitter, etc. When there are interruptions during work, it may ruin your business. So, you best prevent that from happening and find someone that won’t get interrupted during work
According to the The Atlantic website, efforts to promote gun control are renewed after tragedies occur; they then quickly vanish. As stated, “We don 't yet know if today 's tragedy in Connecticut will spark a national debate over gun control, or whether, like many massacres before it, it will fade quietly without leaving its mark on a single law” (Thompson). Derek Thompson cites a study by Ezra Klein reporting about ninety five people in favor of background checks being revised. The chart to the left shows that there are multiple gun control policies; ranking the highest are background checks. Many potential policies are taken into account when deciding which policy would have an ongoing positive outcome.
For example, Rosen states, “According to a recent survey by Microsoft, seventy percent of U.S. recruiters report that they have rejected candidates because of information found online,” (Rosen, Para. 3). Most of the time it is a necessity for companies to do online and background research on candidates because of wanting a safe environment to work in. Social media sites are the fastest way to see who a person truly is. But sometimes it can just be a character they posses because that’s what they’re followers want to see rather than their true self.
ttps://newrepublic.com/article/118286/facts-about-gun-control-and-universal-background-checks "firearms are used in about 31,000 deaths per year." Thesis: The Judicial branch of government should make a law that requires any person who wants to purchase a firearm have a mandatory background check and be put through a class to learn how to keep their firearms from getting into the hands of the wrong people.
According to an article published by The Guardian: Web Edition Articles, the shooter who killed 59 people and wounded 527 in the Las Vegas shooting qualified as a “super-owner” which is someone who owns between 8 and 140 guns. Two senators, Joe Manchin and Pat Toomey, sponsored a bill that would mandate universal background checks for gun purchases, including at gun shows and on the internet. 84% of Americans favored this law. After initial negotiations over the bill, the National Rifle Association opposed the bill and claimed that it would lead to a national gun registry. Four Democrats defected and not enough Republicans got onboard so the legislation failed. “The gun lobby and its allies willfully lied about the bill,” Obama said in a Rose
Interviews are greatly suited for sizing up your potential employee and making difficult decisions on who to reel in. Unfortunately, what you see now can change shape outside of the office. Employers should be able to ask for a potential employee’s Facebook password. As stated in the essay Why Asking for a Job Applicant’s Facebook Password is Fair Game by Alfred Edmond Jr., it is deemed important and necessary to know every single possible detail about an applicant in order to make the best hire (133). This is a great point because although an applicant may seem to be a great fit now, he may end up causing an unforeseen problem in the future. People lie all of the time, unfortunately. The common idea of interviews is simple: conform to what your employers need, say what they want to hear, and dress professionally. Life is different out of the workplace. If employers knew how applicants behaved outside of the work environment, they could find well-esteemed candidates with the ability to get the job done right with good
Over half of the applicants found on search engines and nearly two-thirds of the applicants found on social networking sites were not hired as a result of the information found on the sites. (Source H) Things found on the internet or social media are almost always taken out of context and doesn’t show what the person applying is actually like. Admission offices and employers are more likely to start and use social media to look up applicants. This can make it harder to get into a school or business if you have a social media account. According to and NACAC article, Eighty-eight percent of admission offices believed social media were either “somewhat” or “very” important to their future recruitment efforts. (Source B) Colleges now a days always look to see if applicants have a social media account that means that if they get access to the account there is a 38% chance that, that person does not get accepted. One-fourth of colleges surveyed indicated that they used Web search or social networking
I encourage you to advocate for background checks as well as better school climate. There have been far too many school shootings in recent years, and after Parkland, gun control has been a prevalent topic on people’s minds.
Social networks are increasing dramatically every year. Employers are turning to social networks because it is a tool to screen job applicant’s profiles. According to a survey conducted by jobvite.com (2013), 94 % of employers use social media profiles to recruit job applicants. This trend assists the applicants and recruiters. Job applicants should be judged by their social network profiles because social media give positive image about the candidate, prove the information in the resume, and help to identify if the person fits the culture of the company or not.
This is yet another way of invading privacy. In the past, employers would only know what you told them in your interview. They would assess your skills and determine if you were right for the job, aside from knowing your beliefs or views. However, now with Facebook an employer can see all the personal information, this can negatively influence a candidate’s job. The same goes for those who are currently employed and potential students. “Dr. Nora Barnes, Director for the Center of Marketing Research at University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, published a study that showed more than 20% of colleges and universities search social networks for their admissions candidates” (Fodeman). This is becoming a part of the admissions process, but it is unfair. Searching someone’s Facebook to determine his or her admissions eligibility is wrong and a privacy invasion. As long as a student has fulfilled the school’s requirements and done well in school, why should it matter what their personal lives are like? In the time before Facebook, this would be like a school sending someone to secretly follow a potential student and see what he or she does in their
The way future candidates view social media has evolved drastically over the past ten years as technology has evolved. From websites like LinkedIn to Twitter, each website provides a unique opportunity for employers to view a future candidate. According to Media Bistro/Infographic, “92%of companies” use social media as an initial step to recruit future candidates. Another statistic Media Bistro/Infographic provides is that 73% of employees hire using social media and 20% of employers say it takes less time to hire via social media. What do these small statistics mean? Majority of the time if recruiters use social media, it is like an extra step to background checks and screenings before the interviews. Social Media allows for employers to have additional information of their prospective candidate before hiring. These statistics show that employers look at a person’s profile based on the information that is public or accessible; yet the employer uses that decision to hire the future candidate. Based on what a person post, there are heavy consequenc...
Platforms such as Facebook and Twitter allow users to access company information, photos and employees as well as ask questions and express personal experiences with the company. It also allows potential employees to understand the vibe of the organization and gain a deeper and more personal understanding than a website. However, with social media, it is important to not ove...
Social networking websites have also led to some people being fired or not even being hired in the first place.... ... middle of paper ... ... Students Need to Pay Attention! PBS.
..., which can result in decreased productivity. An employee may be spending more time viewing their friends’ posts and pictures, rather than focusing on their job. Social media can be addicting to some people. This should be monitored by all business owners. Employees can attend a party with people taking pictures, and then the pictures can be misconstrued or distorted. Online reputational concerns can be critical for businesses along with their employees. It can result in loss of employment, loss of economics, and unforgivable social humiliations. Businesses are at another disadvantage while using social media because followers can post negative comments on the business’s Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram site. Also, a hacker can retrieve the company’s page and post false information. A business or organization’s reputation will suffer from these actions. (Oravec 97)
Certainly, a hiring manager’s perception of your online presence is subjective, but the survey showed that of the employers who screen candidates via social networks, about one-third of them found information that caused them to hire a candidate. (Yes, you read that right. It resulted in them HIRING A CANDIDATE!) Those findings include: • Candidate’s background info supports job qualifications – 44% • Candidate’s site conveyed a professional image –
Students who want to find jobs may regret posting private pictures and comments on Facebook. Employers not only screen resumes and conduct interviews, but also view job candidates’ Facebook profiles. The boss wants to know if the applicant is actually a “professional.” Pictures may show the person drinking, smoking, or doing other unprofessional activities. Offensive comments can also hurt an applicant’s chances of getting the job.