Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits of animals living in a zoo
Immorality of zoos
Benefits of animals living in a zoo
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits of animals living in a zoo
Sounds of laughter, joy, and amusement usually overflow in the atmosphere of animal sanctuaries and zoos, since people visit these attractions for the purpose of entertainment. In the United States, animal sanctuaries and zoos have nearly two hundred thousand visitors each year, according to the zoo statistics computed by the Statistics Brain Institute (“Zoo Statistics.”). These zoos and sanctuaries are the proper places where people of all ages, from children to elders, can observe and learn about wildlife animals. Visitors receive entertainment from the wildlife animals that are preserved in the zoos; however, these animals receive a considerable amount of stress from the zoo environment itself. Zoo animals under these conditions rarely inhabit …show more content…
Normally, the life expectancy of these killer whales in their natural habitats is about thirty-to-fifty years; however, the distress they receive from the aquarium’s small space diminished their life expectancy to an average of thirteen years. Furthermore, “all of the captive adult male killer whales have collapsed dorsal fins”, which aid their swimming against strong currents and sudden turns in the ocean. “This is likely because they have no [sufficient amount of wide] space to swim freely, and they are fed an unnatural diet of thawed dead fish” (Goodman, 2016). Through this evidence, one can observe the unethical treatment these animals in captivity …show more content…
“While conceding that zoos have become more proactive and benevolent in their efforts, critics still feel that “good zoos” are in the minority” (Fravel, 2003). The concern of pseudo-sanctuaries incites an urge to inquire into the issue and seek for solutions to remedy the issue. In Denmark, aside from the Copenhagen zoo mentioned previously, a certain conservation organization will experience fresh changes, in which humans will be enclosed, rather than the animals.
At Zootopia,…[the] 300-acre zoo without bars, fences, or glass…[will make] for the “best possible and freest possible environment for animals”…It is not a preserve—as those who want zoos shut down have called for—but it is an advancement in how people think of holding captive animals. Zootopia’s layout would let animals roam land that encircles a doughnut-hole observation center. And though people can walk through tunnels and poke their heads up for a closer look, in this design it is not dangerous animals…that are caged, it is the humans. (Phippen,
Have you ever seen an animal sitting in a cage all alone with nothing to do. Well, zoos are trying to change that fact. They will allow the animals to live in an environment that is like their home. Many people don't realize this, but zoo are keeping and breeding these animals because they would not survive in the wild alone. In the three passages, ¨The Stripes Will Survive,¨ ¨The Zood Go Wild from No More Dodos,¨ ¨Our Beautiful Macaws and Why They Need Enrichment.¨ All of these articles present one claim, that is that the role of zoos is no longer to keep animal, but to protect them.
Animal rights have become a very serious issue here in the United States over the last few decades. One issue that has been discussed is whether or not zoos serve a good purpose or are they just a torture chamber for the animals. Locked up in small cages so people can yell at them and stare. Or are zoos the key to save our species in an ever growing human population. Rachel Lu, a philosophy teacher and senior columnist, writes the article, “Let’s Keep Zoos: Learning stewardship is a good thing.”, published April 18, 2014, argues that zoos are worth keeping. Rachel Lu uses her personal experiences to appeal to her audience that zoos are valuable to people especially young children because it gives them a perspective on nature.
Due to the recent events in the Cincinnati Zoo, arguments have been sparked about the ethics of zoos. Most articles try to argue against zoos and closed environments, but there are those that still support zoos and the programs that they provide for endangered species. The argument “Zoos Are Not Prisons. They Improve the Lives of Animals” focuses on the positives of animal enclosures and fights for support to keep zoos in business. The author, Dr. Robin Ganzert, ties examples about programs that zoos help create and what type of research is conducted in the zoos, to support his claims. To limit his position, he decides to refute opposing viewpoints to conclude that ethical institutions
He states that “Animals in zoos and aquariums can live longer, healthier, and richer lives than their forbearers ever did in the wild.” Studies have proven again and again that for most animals a caged life was a short and unhappy one. To begin with, for many species, a stare is received as a threat. With the public constantly staring at the animals, many of them become depressed. Scared and depressed animals might fill the hours with repetitive behaviors known as stereotypy: masturbating to a danger point, pacing their paws raw, or swaying endlessly from side to side (Cokal 492).
When people go on a trip to the zoo, it can be assumed that they do not think about much more than what they can see. Signals that make zoos unfair and sometimes unbearable for the captive animals are not visible to most spectators. This essay will explain how zoos are unjust and should not be supported. Animals should not be held captive due their negative behavioral changes, lack of natural habitat and the zoos failure to effectively preserve endangered species.
The difference between right and wrong is not always perfectly clear. A long-standing part of cultures across the world, zoological and animal parks have been around for hundreds of years. While in the past concerns and issues regarding the ethical problems zoos seem to impose were less prominent, in recent times the rise of animal rights activist groups and new generational values have influenced the way people view these parks. Critics believe that zoos are an unnatural habitat for animals and force them to live in captivity, having a negative impact on their health. Yet, there are still many who fully support zoos, citing business and educational reasons.
There are many places where people can go to see live animals such as aquariums, zoos, and safari parks. A pleasant way to define a Zoo is to call it “an establishment that maintains a collection of wild animals”. (Google def) Another way to say that is a facility in which animals are “enclosed in cages for public exhibition”. I believe zoos are ethical; however, changes need to be made to eliminate problems I have discovered. In this argumentative essay, I will be arguing the ethics of zoos and certain problems that need to be addressed that people are not aware of. Zoos are great places to take the family out for the day to have entertainment; however, problems such as captive breeding, length of life, and animal stress need to improve.
"Do We Need Zoos?" : An All Creatures Animal Rights Article. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 May 2015.
Zoos present a certain blend of nature and culture. They have always provided a way to bring natural wildlife and urban Americans together as a means of entertainment. Yet, throughout the years the role of zoos have changed. Though once used for amusement, zoos are now being used for education on preservation and the welfare of endangered species. One may wonder where and how the idea of zoos started and just how they, and the environment around them, have changed throughout history.
Since approximately 1250 B.C., ancient Egyptians had created and practiced the capture and display of animals in what are now known as zoos (Fravel). Records describe such exotic animals as birds, lions, giraffes, and tigers in captivity (Fravel). Since then, zoos have continued to entertain millions with the exciting chance to view exotic animals up close and personal. Even in ancient Greece, exotic animals were on display in fighting arenas, and in enclosed viewing areas. Originally in America, zoos were just created so that royalty and the wealthy could flaunt their exotic animals to the public (Leolupus). Today, with species threatened and habitats disappearing worldwide, zoos are serving a new purpose other than the mere exhibition of animals – conservation. (Fravel). When you think of a zoo, you either think of a fun, entertaining place that provides close-up and exciting exhibits of wild animals that you would otherwise never get the chance to see, or a place where people keep suffering, unhappy animals captive just for entertainment and display. However, despite whichever view you hold, and despite the stereotypes, some zoos have evolved to serve alternative and helpful purposes. Although some zoos face controversy due to allegations such as lack of space and quality care, neglect, and cruelty, some zoos have programs specifically designed to help and protect animal species. For example, these zoos have programs that help such conservation efforts as breeding.
The welfare of zoo creatures differs generally. Numerous zoos work to enhance their creature fenced in areas and make it fit the creatures' needs, in spite of the fact that limitations, for example, size and cost make it hard to make perfect hostage situations for some species (Lillian Radulova for Daily Mail Australia, 2014)
Even though some zoos have an endangered species exhibit with the intention of protecting and rehabilitating animals, many do not do an adequate job of protecting the animals. Zoos have been harmful to the very animals they have sworn to protect. Animals in captivity often suffer from anxiety, boredom and other severe issue related to prolonged confinement. Most animals are unable to thrive in small enclosure with unnatural weather and climates. For example elephants are known to walk as far as 30 miles per day, but the association of Zoos and aquariums only require a space the measures $0 feet by 45 feet, which is about the size of a three car garage, to house these large animals. (peta.org) the drastic difference in the amount of space their allowed ...
In these inhumane zoos, the first reason why zoos should be illegalized is that they are given an astonishingly little amount of privacy. The majority of these animals are huddled in the far corners of their cage, or where ever is the farthest from the prying eyes of their audience, as they are being gaped at and taken pictures of for the majority of their days, and when they escape the eyes of humans directly,
Zoos do not protect the dignity of the animals under their care. The species spend their lives trapped behind glass walls and cages. People who argue that cages make animals “better off” send a message similar to “‘who needs the wild when we have zoos?’” (Munro). Although these zoo habitats appear similar to the species’ natural environments, zoos cannot possibly provide the numerous challenges that the animals would encounter in the wild—challenges that wild animals intuitively know how to overcome.
Zoos have been around for centuries. In the past zoos were a simple collection of animals in cages. Many animals in the early 200’s were diseased and treated poorly. Zoos today are very different modern zoos were diseased and treated poorly. Modern zoos pride themselves as centers for scientific studies and research.