Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Case for Torture
Torture advantages and disadvantages
Benefits of torture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Case for Torture
It is sick. Revolting. Up to 90% of countries contain some form of it. Torture. It dominates peoples’ lives. Lives that are precious. Lives that are destroyed. Torture is defined by the UN as, “any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person”(Ten Facts to Know About Torture). Torture includes forms that range from physical beatings to being stripped of all dignity. While most torture is physical, the mental effects take a massive toll on the victim and even the people surrounding the victim(Key Facts). And, of course, as most people know, torture was infamously used by the Japanese and in the Holocaust in World War II. World War II was common breeding ground for torture as a lot of information was needed and torture seemed to be the best way to get it(Roberts). In many ways, World War II was the effect of earlier torture places, camps, and prisons; however, World War II was also the mother to modern torture devices, ideas, and events.
Torture has been around for centuries. Religious groups practiced torture as modes of punishment within the religion. During medieval times, torture was considered an acceptable form of punishment and way to get information within courts. Up until World War II, torture was considered normal. It was just acceptable in society. People who break the law have to suffer through it(Woodard). Leading up to World War II, torture was practiced all around the city of Berlin, Germany in secret houses, prisons, and camps. One such location is a café turned murder basement on a quiet street. Little do the investigators know, there are 220 more of these torture sites all around Berlin. This web of torture, not only in Berlin, but a...
... middle of paper ...
... in World War II led to the creation of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Geneva Convention. Both prohibited and made torture illegal (Woodard). But torture does not stop there. Torture is just as present in today’s world as it was decades ago. Recently, pro-Ukraine citizens have been abducted and tortured for supporting their country. Pro-Russians obviously do not agree with them and torture seems as if it is the best way to deal with them(Bigg). From ancient times to 2014, torture is used to punish people for either breaking the law or simply not conforming to other peoples’ beliefs. Sure it seems as if our world today is completely different, which it is, but that is just the physical look of it. The people in society haven’t changed. They still have their cruel, cold hearts. And that is not going to change anytime soon.
Who wouldn’t have agreed? Yes, torture is cruel but it is less cruel than the substitute in many positions. Killing Hitler wouldn’t have revived his millions of victims nor would it have ended war. But torture in this predicament is planned to bring no one back but to keep faultless people from being sent off. Of course mass murdering is far more barbaric than torture. The most influential argument against using torture as a penalty or to get an acknowledgment is that such practices ignore the rights of the particulars. Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture” discusses both sides of being with and being against torture. This essay gets readers thinking a lot about the scenarios Levin mentioned that torture is justified. Though using pathos, he doesn’t achieve the argument as well as he should because of the absence of good judgment and reasoning. In addition to emotional appeal, the author tries to make you think twice about your take on
Until there is a credible way to determine whether or not torture is in fact effective, I pass judgment that the practice should be discontinued. The question as to if the torture policy is a human rights violation or if it holds crucial necessity, is not answered in the essay. Applebaum explores the reality that torture possesses negative implications on the inflictor. After presented with the compelling stance and evidence, Applebaum raises the interesting question as to why so much of society believes that torture is successful. I agree that the torture policy is wrong, a point emphasized by Applebaum, contrary to the popular attitude surrounding the topic.
Because of the 9/11 terrorist, the U.S. have been able to limit the outcomes they produce by using physical and mental torture against their emotional torture they used on the Citizens. Its not the U.S. that started this battle over the use of torture, america had to protect itself from further hurt. “The suffering caused by the terrorists is the real torture (Jean-Marie Le Pen).” people argue that torture it is an inhumane act to deliberately beat a victim physically and mentally. The problem is that there are no other possible solutions to obtain information that are as effective as torture on such events other than force it out of them by using torture as their primary weapon (The Legal Prohibition). If the U.S. wants to pursue the safety of americans they have to take actions, As long as there are no bombs going off around the world, the U.S. will continue to use torture . Terrorism has become a much greater threat than before. regardless if the beating are too extreme, it is still the duty of the state to protect its citizens (Torture Is Just Means). Even if the interoges are suffering from severe torture, the U.S. is able t...
...less outside of intimidation. Currently we are debating whether torture would be a useful tool in society, but some have solved the answer for us many years ago. Those who commit crimes are often willing to sacrifice their life to keep the secret. Torture simply lowers us to their standards and facilitates increased terrorist activity in the long run. Why put salt on the wound when you have a Band-aid? Torturing cannot be morally justified.
On the opposite side, there are people very much in favor of the use of torture. To them, torture is a “morally defensible” interrogation method (8). The most widely used reason for torture is when many lives are in imminent danger. This means that any forms of causing harm are acceptable. This may seem reasonable, as you sacrifice one life to save way more, but it’s demoralizing. The arguments that justify torture usually are way too extreme to happen in the real world. The golden rule also plays a big rol...
Torture is the intentional infliction of extreme physical suffering on some non-consenting, defenseless person. Torture in any form is used to punish, coerce, or afford sadistic pleasure.
The topic that covers this essay:: is it morally permissible to torture an innocent child to stop a nuclear threat. I shall defend by stating that it is morally permissible to torture an innocent child by arguing, first, that by torturing a child one can save millions of lives, and secondly that if we torture the child we will be just harming him, not killing him. First I will depict the three approaches to morality presented in this course (Utilitarianism, Virtue Ethics and Kant’s). Then I’ll present my own stand and try to support my reasoning with the three moral approaches if possible. Then I’ll continue with a counter argument followed by a conclusion.
There has been an ongoing debate regarding torture and ethical reasoning to determine when or if its ever ok. Modern scholars such as Alan Dershowitz, Sam Harris, and Charles & Gregory Fried, have expressed different ideas on ethical torture. Ideas of ethical reasoning were established by John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. Even though they did not specifically use torture as an example of ethical reasoning for decision making their rational can still be applied to this topic.
According to Casey Carmical, capital punishment is a justifiable penalty to deciding to end the life of another human being. In fact, she goes on to argue that should one choose not to execute on the grounds of murder, we the people would be committing a moral injustice to the deceased. Capital punishment should essentially be viewed as lawfully ending the life of a human being as the result of a their decision to commit a heinous crime that fatally injured another person; however murder, as defined by Carmical is, “the unlawful and malicious or premeditated killing of one human being by another.” The death penalty is clearly defined within its name alone, a penalty given by a court of law as the result of a malicious crime. The murderer is not sentenced to death without cause; they are suffering the consequences of their crime. The death of the accused is completed by government
In the wake of torture practices surfacing in the public eye, much debate circulate about possibly institutionalising as well legalising torture with the intention of addressing issues of practices that ...
“The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin introduces the topic of torture as an acceptable measure for preventing future evil. According to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, torture is the act or practice of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment that forces them to do or say something, or for the pleasure of the person inflicting the pain. Victims may be tortured for various reasons, such as for the tormentor’s own pleasure, a motive for revenge, or the need to obtain answers. At some point in life, everyone has thoughts of torturing another individual, especially when experiencing traumatic events or simply seeking for revenge. Stanley Milgram’s Shock Experiment, the Iraqi Prisoner, and Philip
Initially, torture is unacceptable because it is always immoral. The first reason it is is that of the inhumane treatment that this entails. Often the victims are put into a position where to get the torture to stop they have to give up information on something they are suspected of doing, not something they were proven to have done. Torture uses people as a means to an end to get information. Who the victim is or what kind of life they have is disregarded in favor of getting information out of them. Despite the fact that it has been deemed unacceptable by many nations it is still used to this day. This shows how torture is unacceptable based on the fact that it is always immoral.
As of the year 2015 one hundred and forty one countries still use torture. Torture which is defined as " the action or practice of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or to force them to do or say something, or for the pleasure of the person inflicting the pain" is a travesty that still occurs in our suppose modern society. Torture is wrong on a human and moral basis, and there is no excuse why any country should still partake in the atrocity that is torture. Bear in mind that this torture isn’t just happening in uncivilized or third world countries. Premier countries such as the United States and China partake in torture as well as lesser countries like Uganda and Nigeria.
In conclusion, the convention against torture, has brought many people together, and has informed many people of the horrible tortures which go on everywhere from the US to Syria. It has tried to set fine lines which prohibit torture under all circumstances. However, since there is no governing body over countries, it remains difficult to enforce the human right standards sought after by the Convention against torture. The convention has therefore done a good job at identifying the torturers. This has in turn lessened the amount of those persecuted. It will remain a gradual process to eliminate torture from all countries, but nevertheless a necessity, in the quest for universal human rights. Torture will continue until all countries decide for themselves, and not from a third party convention that freedom from torture is a human right everyone deserves.
The act of torture is something my family often has discussions about, since this is one of the controversial topics my family is passionate about. Like most people, some of my family members are against it, while others are for it. Growing up hearing about these discussions, left me feeling extremely curious, however unlike my parents and other family members, I wasn’t confident and couldn’t decide whether I was for or against torture. Therefore, after finding out that one of the options we could use as our topics for our editorial was torture, I was naturally and obviously intrigued. Therefore, I decided to take the opportunity to look at torture from both perspectives in hopes of being able to finally decide whether I am for or against this controversial topic.