Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Easy about donating plasma
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Plasma Donation: To Poke or Not To Poke To poke or not to poke? The question many of us ponder as we think about plasma donation and decide if that is something we’re up for or not. For some of us, the debate in our head is whether we want to help others by giving up a part of ourselves, while for others the literal fear of needles makes them question if they could actually handle the poke. But for some, it’s about making quick cash. There are a few questions you must ask yourself before you decide if donating plasma is for you; is getting paid to make a donation ethical, is the cash worth the risk, is there a reason to donate plasma besides the cash they offer?
In Wendy Glauser’s article, Payment for Plasma Raises Ethical Issues, she notes
“Donating plasma on a regular basis would seem far more costly in terms of the health and longevity for any donor than any medical professionals are inclined to share” (West 2). Learning about all aspects of plasma donation other than the measly $30 or so that you may receive could potentially add years to your life, or change your mind about earning “easy cash.” The author, Prof. Karl West, promotes learning about all the options and aspects of plasma donation before just jumping right into it. Because you may feel that your health is worth more than a few easy paychecks. This Man’s Blood Has Saved the Lives of Two Million Babies by Samantha Bresnahan of CNN, tells the story of James Harrison, a 78 year old man, who has donated plasma from his right arm, his golden arm, for the past 60 years. He had an operation in 1951, at age 14, where the doctors removed one of his lungs. During his surgery he received 13 liters of donated blood that saved his life, and because of that Harrison became a donor himself. Once becoming a donor it was discovered that that plasma in his blood contained the answer to a serious
Glauser’s article, Payment for Plasma Raises Ethical Issues, and West’s article, The True Price of Plasma Donation, both bring up the point about getting paid to donate. Glauser feels that it is unethical and proves that throughout her article, even getting a quote from the vice chair of Canadian Doctors for Medicare, Dr. Ryan Meili, previously mentioned which supports her stance. While West is more concerned with the donors health and wellbeing, and money over ruling them to be bad. Plasma is needed all over the place which is partly why the incentives are a part of the donating process for plasma but both authors see that as taking away from the true definition of donating. Brensahan’s article, This Man’s Blood Has Saved the Lives of Two Million Babies, portrays a simple man who donates solely to give back to others, because at one point in his life other peoples’ donations of their blood saved him. Bresnahan doesn’t bring up being paid to donate at all. She only covers how much one person, Harrison specifically, can change the lives of millions by simply giving back -no strings
Sometimes people cant help but feel entitled to payment when they make a contribution to a money-making prfit, idea or discovery. The issue is that sometimes, those charities are too small and simple to warrant a reward. Rebecca Skloot’s The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks brings up the problem of sharing a incentive, as many members of the Lacks family feel justifiable of a share in the money made from research done on Henrietta’s cancer cells. By writing about the Lacks family and their knowledge with the Hela cells, Skloot’s readers may see eye to eye on the fact that they deserve compensation. Although, when the facts are taken into consideration, it makes sense that the Lacks’ do not receive money for their mothers big contribution to science. A donor is usually needed for scientists to make important assumptions or discoveries through studying donated cells or even tissue. However, the donor is not necessarily deserving of a share of any of the profits that the scientist earns because the persons role in the research is much less signifgant than many belive and the actual r...
2. People should give blood because it is easy and though there might be a little pain involved it is worth it because it saves so many lives and you get great snacks.
The concept of potential donators having a personal connection, which increases their odds of donating and can be created using incentives, as well as the evidence that tax breaks raise the amount of financial donations to charities and non-profits, both serve to help build a compelling argument that incentives are not only beneficial, but necessary, to help people ethically donate. While incentives can sometimes be unfair to others, generally they are not. Overall, it shouldn’t matter why people give, as ethically, giving is always
Conversely, in the case of preventing the death of a child in a third world country by donating to a charity, you are more likely prolonging a life for a short period of time rather than truly saving it. Donating money that will be put towards, for example, a malaria net, may prevent someone from passing away due to one illness but it will not give them an education and it will not save them from famine or distress. The donation will only save people in great poverty from one of their many struggles. In the biography “Mountains Beyond Mountains,” Tracy Kidder discusses Paul Farmer’s establishment of the nonprofit, Partners in Health, that obtains donations to its charitable cause from large companies and organizations. These companies and organizations are well-established foundations that can give an amount of money great enough to potentially make a difference and save lives through health care. Nonetheless, even with these great amounts of money, one of Farmer’s patients, John, gets all the medical help possible yet dies anyway. This saddening story exemplifies the point that when donating you cannot guarantee that a life will be saved. The best medical care possible could not save John, so even the best help we can give through charity may not save the people in need. There are many struggles in third-world countries
Harmening, D. M. (2005). Modern Blood Banking & Transfusion Practices. Philidelphia, PA: F.A. Davis Company.
“A man who has had sex with another man within the last five years, whether oral or anal sex, with or without a condom or other form of protection, is not permitted to donate blood and must please not do so.”
A pittance for your kidney? It’s highly unlikely that anyone would answer yes to that question; however what if someone offered significantly more than a pittance? A thousand dollars, or perhaps even five thousand dollars? Although the buying and selling of organs is illegal on American soil, it’s no secret that the opportunity exists in other countries around the world. “In America, we have waiting list for people who are trying to get kidneys, there they have people who are on a wait list to sell their kidneys” (Gillespie). It’s quite incredible how a country cut off from western civilization, like Iran, has found such an innovative way to encourage organ donation. In American society one needs to “opt in” if they wish to participate in the
It is stated in the National Blood Transfusion Service (2013) guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) that donor recruitment must begin from donors who belong in a low risk, safe and healthy population of a community. It is also strongly prohibited to pay any donors. The blood transfusion process is a very thorough and meticulous process to ensure the safety of the donor and the recipient of the blood unit.
Donating blood can be a quite rewarding experience and I encourage everyone to take part in this unique opportunity to save 3 lives with each donation.
In the essay, “The Tyranny of the Gift: Sacrificial Violence in Living Donor Transplants”, Medical Anthropologist Nancy Scheper-Hughes argues that “paid kidney donors and related donors are often responding to family pressures and to a call to ‘sacrifice’” (Scheper-Hughes, 2007, p.507). She argues that donors are burdened by the very act and live a lifetime with the repercussions. She generalizes that all aspects of living-organ donation are wrought with abuse. She uses many examples to support her viewpoint of donor exploitation. Scheper-Hughes presents a compelling argument on the sociological and anthropological ramifications of a living-donor on the social and familial structures. However, despite its many strengths, there are a number of small, but important, weaknesses.
Whether it be helping others that need a blood transfusion, or a supplemental source of income, donating plasma is an extravagant process that takes more effort than the normal citizen realizes. Previously I have explained the entirety of the donation procedure, including the waiting room ordeal, the donating, and then the end stages of the process. This information was presented so that others curious about plasma donation can vicariously live the donation process, and get a feel for what really goes on in the Biolife Plasma Center.
The fact that Sol and his colleagues were willing to take the blood from drug and alcohol addicts and resell it shows the risks they were willing to take in order to accrue revenue. It was soon after that people who received the blood were diagnosed with hepatitis. It was then that Plasma International wanted to look for other sources of safe and uncontaminated blood. Turning to West Africa, Plasma International knowingly bought pints of blood from West Africans with the intention of selling it approximately 166 times more than what they bought it for. Some may view this differently, but I personally believe that it was a wrong and shameful
By donating blood to insure there is enough in supply, the life we save may be our own.
I have given blood before and I am aware of the questionnaire and procedures used during the blood donation process.
We are eternally grateful to my brother for his generous act. He has made such a difference in our lives. I’ve thanked him, of course, but he says he got as much out of the experience as he gave. I’ve asked him how he found the courage to be a donor and he says he just believed it was the right thing to do. Maybe that is what makes a hero, someone who has the courage to speak out and act on their beliefs. He is certainly a hero to me.