Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia

Euthanasia The problem of euthanasia, like abortion and other controversial dilemmas of our times, divides society almost the whole of the Western world on its supporters and opponents.
Euthanasia is generally referred to as a conscious choice of death, caused by various factors. In a narrow sense, euthanasia is when a person wishing to death, and the person inflicting death, assess the situation positively, as their welfare. We also distinguish active euthanasia, which involves the administration of suitable substances that lead to the death of the human body, and passive euthanasia, in which a person is deprived of resources and life-sustaining substances. Euthanasia is usually succumb to those terminally ill or suffering from very serious

Faris in his article wrote about Brittany Mayrand who was an 29 years old woman with grade 4 brain cancer, and has prognosis of six months to live. She decide to end her life with dignity. She moved with her family to Oregon state where the euthanasia was legalized at that time. "Legally speaking, death with dignity is "a medical practice in which a terminally ill and mentally competent adult requests, and a doctor prescribes, a life-ending medication the person self-administers when and if they choose." Oregon 's Death with Dignity Act was the first of its kind in the nation and helped pioneered the burgeoning national movement. Brittany Maynard 's own campaign for death with dignity began after she underwent a partial craniotomy and a partial resection of her temporal lobe; her tumor had returned, and it was even more aggressive than before. After extensive research and deliberation, the beautiful newlywed with the beaming smile chose to die on her own terms. For Maynard, the opportunity to avoid harrowing treatments and prolonged suffering gave her some much-needed peace of mind: it was a detour from adding more unnecessary pain to both her and her loved ones '

In their case decision about euthanasia are in hands of his or her family and not always are good for those who are ill. However, even in a situation where the person taking this decision it is fully aware of , and indeed it wants , it is not morally ambiguous. The main arguments which they appear , refer mainly to metaphysical questions . It is said here that man has no right to decide about his death, just as you do not decide about the birth . Opponents believe that every human being has appointed his own time to live and he has no right to interfere in it . If we assume that the decision maker on these matters is God , this discussion is theoretically resolved . If God is the giver of life and his Lord , then only he can decide about death - that is independent of religion , which point of view we