“You don’t concentrate on risks. You concentrate on results. No risk is too great to prevent the necessary job from getting done.” (Chuck Yeager). Summarized, this means to not draw conclusions immediately. At the end of a risk, there could be great things, and no bad ending of a risk is too great to stop one from taking it. Exploration is worth the risk because it can open beneficial opportunities for society, teach lessons on how the world and people function, and finally open chances for legendary discoveries or achievements.
To begin with, exploration is worth the risk because it can open beneficial opportunities in the future. For example, John F. Kennedy stated in “Remarks at the Dedication of the Aerospace Medical Health Center”
…show more content…
For example, look at the blue packet article “Inventors and Scientists: Katherine Johnson” by NewsELA. In paragraph fifteen, I quote “..they said that they wanted the capsule to land down at a certain place..I said, Let me do it. You tell me when you want it and where you want it to land.” (Johnson,15). Also in paragraph sixteen, “John Glenn requested that Johnson recheck the calculations..before his flight aboard Friendship 7.” (NewsELA,16). Friendship Seven was NASA and The United States taking a risk to send a man into orbit, not to mention in the hands of an African-American woman. In NASA’s view in 1961, that was a huge risk. However they took the risk and it led to a boost in the Space Race against Russia and African-Americans gaining more acceptance. These were huge achievements in history. Others may say that Katherine Johnson checking the calculations was not a risk, as she had gotten the calculations correct before and the calculations made by the IBM were correct any ways. However they may forget that NASA had the risk of allowing an African-American to control the flight, people that had a horrible reputation and were alienated. Also, it was a big risk to take from the beginning as NASA had failed sending someone into orbit 2 times
Have you ever felt stuck? Wherever you are, it’s the absolute last place you want to be. In the book Into the Wild, Chris McCandless feels stuck just like the average everyday person may feel. Chris finds his escape plan to the situation and feels he will free himself by going off to the wild. I agree with the author that Chris McCandless wasn’t a crazy person, a sociopath, or an outcast because he got along with many people very well, but he did seem somewhat incompetent, even though he survived for quite some time.
Taking leaps off the edges of cliffs doesn’t sound like a good idea; the chances of making to the other side is too low. It’s not worth the risk to do something scary, who knows what’s on the other side? The discussion relates to the argument whether major exploration is worth the risk. The risks for major exploration are too dangerous to face. “Why Exploring the Ocean is Mankind’s Next Giant Leap” by Philippe Cousteau, “Stinging Tentacles Offer Hint of Oceans’ Decline” by Elisabeth Rosenthal, “Remarks at the Dedication of the Aerospace Medical Health Center” by John F. Kennedy, “Living in the Dark” by Cheryl Bardoe, and “Is Space Exploration Worth the Cost?” by Joan Vernikos support the idea that major exploration is not worth the risk.
Some people think that the journey is more important than the destination. I believe that this statement is right. What people don’t realize is that the destination may have been the reason why you started your journey, but the journey teaches life lessons that a destination cannot. For example, Martin Luther King Jr. had a destination for equal rights for colored people. On his journey he learned that this task was going to be complex and very chaotic.
Margie Warrell explains how as a culture we don’t take enough risks. We do this because our modus operandi is to catastrophize and predict things will go wrong even though we often overestimate the risks. She also states that we expect things to be worse than they would be if they do turn out badly because our brains are wired to do so. Often we are pessimistic of our own abilities and so we expect we will be unable to cope with the consequences, thus we try to avoid risk so we don’t have to worry about needing to fix things in the aftermath. While overplaying the risks of doing something we downplay the risks of following the status quo—we try to persuade ourselves that it is better than taking the risk even if the status quo is sub-par.
Do you comprehend what “glittering generalities” is? Glittering generalities is a vague word or phrase used to evoke positive feelings rather than to convey information to others. The type of advertisement EvoShield is using is glittering generalities. It’s a black background with a yellow EvoShield logo in the middle and right under it in capital white letters it states ¨Protective Gear For Elite Performance.” EvoShield used that advertisement to convince customers that their product is the best product out and they should buy it. “Protective Gear For Elite Performance” states that EvoShield’s gear/equipment will improve performance and limit errors that you or other equipment will commit.
“Man masters nature not by force but by understanding. This is why science has succeeded where magic failed: because it has looked for no spell to cast over nature”. From the beginning of time man and nature has been in conflict with one another because, as a whole, there is no cooperating. Each one tirelessly wants its way. The Man is fighting for dominance and nature w never yielding its authority. In American Literature, many authors illustrate this theme in their writing. Specifically the writers Jack London in The Law Of Life, Stephen Crane The Open Boat and Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Fin. Each explores the relationship between humans and nature but with slightly different methods. Mark Twain uses nature in a realistic way, Jack London in a naturalistic way and Stephen Crane constitutes a combination of both.
Every day, more and more attempts of banning books and taking away the rights of our First Amendment get violated. The challenging of a book is the attempt to remove or restrict materials, and the banning is the removal of these materials. I believe that books should not be banned for these reasons.
Every person has wondered about something - whether it be a person, place, thing, law, or anything that someone can think about. They ask questions both rhetorical and actual to themselves, and usually make it a mission to answer these questions. Some of the biggest questions have something to do with culture and religion. One of the most major questions of all time - to what extent does an individual have control over the outcome of his or her life? There are many different opinions on this topic.
What makes a good person good? According to WikiHow, "We should learn to define our own morals ourselves. One of the simplest ways to do so is to love others, and treat them as you would like to be treated. Try to think of others before yourself. Even doing small things daily will greatly enrich and improve your life, and the lives of others around you." This quote shows us what we need to do in order to be what society thinks as, “good". In order to be a good person, you have to do good and moral things in your society consistently. However people might think that by doing one good thing once in a while will automatically make you a “good person”, but in reality it doesn’t.
Have you ever had to make a decision in your life? I’m pretty sure we all have, the decision can even be what you ate for breakfast in the morning. Robert Frost wrote a poem about a man who has to make an important decision. In the poem “The Road Not Taken”, by Robert Frost, he states, “Two roads diverged in a yellow wood and I - I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference” (Woods). To me taking the road less traveled by means, doing something on your own. It means not following a crowd, it means doing something unique. It can be hard to go your own way, but that is what Robert Frost is talking about. Everybody should go the path is right for them, not the one that many other people have gone down. There are many examples of people taking the unexpected path, I have gone through a path many people have never seen before, so have
NASA’s research and innovation looked promising, but it came at a cost. Money, resources, and spacecraft accidents, most famously Apollo 13 all hindered NASA’s research. In the 21st century, the debate over funding for NASA is at its peak since the birth of the organization in 1958, especially when there are numerous problems throughout the world. Is the money spent on space exploration worth the advantages and advances it contributes to society? When considering this topic, one might ask themselves, why explore space?
Mankind has always been fascinated with exploring the unknown. From sailing to distant lands to someday setting foot on other planets, the spirit of exploration is the same. Bur now with the current economic situation and the high cost of sending people to space, NASA is being looked at as a way to free up some much needed funds. Although, there is many problems here on planet Earth that need addressing, the benefits of space exploration far out weight the disadvantages. Space exploration has given us more advanced technology, advances in the medical field, and a boost to the economy and these facts cannot be disputed.
Many answers can come from exploring space. Getting a “few lumps of moon rock” can answer so many questions we asked ourselves for millennia. Can we truly belong in a place we do not know about? Space exploration will better us now and in the future for several reasons. The idea of travelling into the unknown has puzzled life since it could move.
Not every event has a guaranteed outcome- sometimes, one has to take a gamble in the game of life. There are some, however, who would prefer to travel within the safe, confined lane of actions with a definite outcome. Deciding whether or not to take risks in life can be tricky, but as Ralph Waldo Emerson once said, “Do not be too timid and squeamish about your actions. All life is an experiment.” This quote means that people should take risks in their endeavors, because life is precisely about trying new things and experiences. As the quote explains, taking risks in life is a vital step to success, fulfillment, and gaining more out of experiences.
By being in a very technologically advanced era, scientists can invent revolutionary devices never thought of. NASA is doing that right now and has been doing that since it began. They are not only climbing the stairs in space exploration but in the medical industry, too. Nevertheless, they are forever changing millions of lives by using all they have discovered. Most of all, they are teaching people a life lesson, to always use the things you have for the greater good. NASA has achieved profound success ever since their start in 1958 and they will continue to make discovery and innovation their first and foremost goal for years to come.