Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Classes of gifted and talented learners
Heredity or environment and socialization
Nurture Vs. Nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Classes of gifted and talented learners
Nature surpasses nurture is what I read in this article studied in psychology. Based on this information explained given on this topic we have physical, mental and behavioral characteristics wired on since before birth. The Nativist believe that we are predominantly given these tendencies due to are genetic code and the product of evolution. Some characteristics and differences not observed at birth are due later in maturation with help of our biological clock ticking inside of us. This biological clock is pre-programmed to switch on and off on our given time to do so. And on the other side of the spectrum, the environmentalist believes we are born with a clean slate and growth will began at birth and our experiences will start gradually. They …show more content…
say that how you are brought up is the nurture part that will determined your life. Now we can’t solely go with each side, both are to the extreme, but we can go with what we’ve learned that child development is based on how much we are influenced by environment and heredity. Some traits that we are born with basically are all due to our genetic codes like our hair and eyes color.
Most of our behaviors due to our environment, just like the way we eat, was taught from our parents. We are prone to grow and learn from our surroundings, the product of our culture and values that are instilled in us. For example, how the Nazi’s believed that they could manipulate genetics by creating the perfect race. The German Nazi believed that by controlling and killing off other races they ultimately keep their race perfect and superior. The environmentalist also think that the minority race is prone to lower IQ because of differences in our social inequalities. How the poor stay inferior to the more privileged because of the deficient resources we are denied of. Therefore, this topic is such a hot one and will always be politically incorrect, because of the inequalities in testing and biased …show more content…
opinions. In our family side of my father we tend to have the stronger genes, for example if you are a Perez (dad’s last name) you must have the big fat toe and small nail in the middle if not you are not part of the family (LOL). These are the traits that we all share and are proud of. I have always been the skinny one from my siblings, this I do believe came from my mom side. She was the thin one from her siblings as well. Unfortunately, we also have a lot of disease that have been passed on from both sides of the families. My dad and his parents had diabetes and most of us tend to be prone to it due to that. But I do believe this could be preventable with early prevention and eating healthier. I had fought diabetes since young but a few years back I decided to become vegetarian and all was cured. There’s been skeptics in my family regarding it but only my doctor and I have seen the positive results of a healthier eating lifestyle. I grew up in a lower-class family with immigrant parents and my siblings and I being first generation Mex-Americans.
I did not feel like we were poor or missing anything not needed because my dad and mom made sure we had our necessities covered. Growing up on our neighborhood was so much fun, we had all types of ethnicities and families surrounding us. I don’t feel we were deprived of much maybe just a better education. My brother and I were put on gifted classes since we were in first grade and our schools didn’t have the means and teachers didn’t helped much. My parents couldn’t afford sending us to better schools so we feel we weren’t challenge enough and this affected our educational growth. I guess this really took a toll on me and I decided not to pursue my abilities on the other side my brother went on to USC and graduate from CSUN. I believe that my parents didn’t help me or push me to succeed, and continue with school because I was a girl. Their mentality was old fashioned and wanted me to be a housewife and learn what my mother had learned from young. Now I’m trying to break that cycle with my own daughters and teach them they could be successful in every humanly
way. Just like a mentioned before in the last paragraph, my goals are to finally complete my degree in Child Development and graduate with good grades. It’s never too late to learn and educate yourself in every possible way. That’s what I’ve always believe and have preached it to all my loved ones, you are what you learn. It’s been a challenge to return to school after a few years of not doing much, educational wise. This last fall semester, I proved to myself that even if you are a full-time mommy and student you can complete all your online classes with good grades. I try to set short term goals so they could be more attainable and successful, this is my helpful technique. My time is very important, like I’m sure it is to everyone else, and every minute counts in completing all my tasks on time. I live side by side with my calendar, this has helped take control of my daily routine. I recommend all students to do the same and not get overwhelmed by the things you can’t control.
The nature versus nurture theory is a way to distinguish whether certain traits or characteristics of individuals are impacted more by biological means or environmental means. What the “nature” part signifies in the the theory is that we are more impacted by heredity and biological effects of our personality and what defines us as a person. What “nurture” signifies is that environmental factors have a more powerful impact on our lives and personality. As we mostly know, most things aren’t black and white, and so it’s hard ro determine which type of factors is more effective. Most people believe that it’s a blend of both nature and nurture that makes us who we are.
The nature vs. nurture controversy is an age old question in the scientific and psychological world with both camps having evidence to support their theories. The controversy lies in which is more influential in the development of human beings. While there is no definitive answer for this, it is interesting to look at each of them separately.
“The term “nature versus nurture” is used to refer to a long-running scientific debate. The source of debate is the question of which has a greater influence on development: someone's innate characteristics provided by genetics, or someone's environment. In fact, the nature versus nurture debate has been largely termed obsolete by many researchers, because both innate characteristics and environment play a huge role in development, and they often intersect”. (Smith, 2010 p. 1)
Since the beginnings of psychology the debate of nature verses nurture has been going on. Certain psychologists take the position of the nature perspective. They argue that people are born with predispositions towards certain personalities, traits and other characteristics that help shape them into the people that they become later in life. Meanwhile multiple other psychologists argue the nurture perspective. They believe that people are born as a blank slate and their experiences over the course of life help shape their personalities, traits, and other characteristics.
We cannot be absolute when it comes what shapes us, yes indeed we come to this world which specific characteristic, our genes make us who we are but do not determine our future and our possible potential. Our cultural influence and our interaction with our environment make up our experience and step by step build our schemas and our perception regarding the world around us. Nature gives us the first tools in order for us to service, give us the information from generation to generation to overcome the possible obstacles. Then, nurture’s takes over, through the interaction with the averment, base to our cultural norms and rules we shape our beliefs; values; attitudes and behaviors. We learn how to behave, how to interact and how to communicate with the people around us. Thus, the answer between what side to choose, nature or nurture, I personally believe that the answer lies between the two of them. As we say, especially in the field of psychology, it depends. Yes, we born into this world we some innate information, but this information is interpreted from the stimuli we gather through the interaction we have with the
Nature versus nurture refers to the debate of whether behaviors are learned behaviors from one’s environment or by their genetics. The nature component is that of genetics. Scientists and Christians have long debated how one learns behaviors and likes or dislikes. This debate is one of the oldest in history according to Eric Lee 1. Many scientists have completed studies to determine which characterizes come from nature or nurture. “Meyers states that, “There are few things that are not so strongly tied to genetics. Among those are “attitudes, values, manners, faith, and politics.”” 2. One point that most agree on is that both nature and nurture play roles in how a person develops.
One of the hottest debates is and has been nature vs nurture for years, but what is the difference between the two? Nature is what people think of as already having and not being able to change it, in other words, pre-wiring (Sincero). Nurture is the influence of experiences and its environment of external factors (Sincero). Both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. Scientists and researchers are both trying to figure out which is the main cause in development because it is still unknown on which it is. The best position to side with is nature. Nature is also defined as genetic or hormone based behaviors (Agin). Regardless of the involvement in everyday life, or nurture, this argumentation centers around the effect genes have on human personalities. Although it is understandable on reasons to side with nurture, nature is the better stand in this controversy. Reasons to side with nature is because of genes and what genes hold. Genes is what
Cecelia Chichan, who was four when her parents and brother were among the 154 people killed when a plane went crashing down on August 16, 1987. She became known as the 'miracle child' after she was dug out of the burning wreckage by a rescuer who heard her whimper. Cecelia, who is now 31 and married has a small tattoo of an airplane on her left wrist to remind her of a tragedy that she thinks about 'daily'. She feels guilty because she is the only one of her family who survived the terrible accident. Many people argue whether or not survivors of life and death situations should feel survivor's guilt. Survivors of life and death situations should not feel survivor's guilt.
Nature and Nurture are both things that work together they aren’t just separate jobs. They each may do a bit of different things but all in all they both work together and they do things with each other and may also do some things alone.
One of the most well-known debates in psychology is nature versus nurture. Nature is pre-determined traits, influenced by biological factors and genetics. Physical characteristics such as height, hair color, and eye color is all determined by the genetics we inherit. Nurture is the influence of environmental factors. Nature and nurture affects the physical, emotional, and social development of a child.
Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen have been America’s darlings since their early success taking turns as the lovable Michelle Tanner on the hit show Full House. As they got older, they built a media empire of specials, movies, television shows, fashion and perfumes, all banking on their fame and adorable twin appeal. Now all grown up, the Olsen Twins focus more on their work in the fashion world, with neither of them taking a part on screen in years. Read on to find out more about Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen, and stay tuned for part two of this list, coming soon.
“But the whole point of the Sixties was that you had to take people as they were. If you came in with us you left your class, and color, and religion behind, that was what the Sixties was all about” (Michael Caine). The powerful words of Michael Caine embrace the memorable time period of the 1960’s. As the people entered into this society of change, they soon came to realize that they would not be the same as they were before. From the struggle of the Civil Rights Movement, to the victory of the Voting Rights Act, and the peaceful voices of the hippies, the Sixties can be remembered as a time of embracing each other’s imperfections.
Nature vs nurture debate is one of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology. It is the scientific cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are caused primarily by nature or nurture. Nature and nurture are both equally important. They are the two are major influences that affect the person you grow to be and will determine what your children will be tomorrow. Nature refers to heredity, which are traits and features that are inherited from your parents and ancestors. At birth you, as a person, inherits 50% of each parent 's genetic material that are passed along through the chromosomes found in the DNA. Hair color, height, body type, and eye color are some examples of characteristics
On the other hand, some disagree with the claim that gender is a constructed social identity that is dangerous today. First, the counter argument begins by calling gender a necessary way to give humans characteristics that are recognizable. Since, no one can deny the biology of determining the sex, gender is one of the first things that identifies humans. Secondly, people see the duality between men and women to be a natural consequence, because “anyone can clearly see that humanity is split into two categories of individuals with manifestly different clothes, faces, bodies, smiles, movements, interests, and occupations” (Beauvoir 24); these differences should not be ignored. Nature made men and women dimorphic, hence dualistic mindsets are
Substance abuse is a real problem for many people in America. People use drugs for several issues that they may have in life, such as a traumatic loss, stress, or just to have fun. Over the course of time, substance abuse can do harmful things to the body and change a person’s outlook on life. For women specifically, they use drugs for weight control, to fight exhaustion, to cope with pain, and to self-treat mental problems (NIAD,2017, para. 2). Also, women may have more drug cravings and may be more likely to relapse after treatment than men (NIAD,2017, para 4). A quote from one of my articles stated, “What makes a woman’s right to procreate more important than the right of a child to have a normal life?” (Harris, 2010). In this paper, I