Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The new world of police accountability
Restorative justice and deterrence
Restorative justice and deterrence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The new world of police accountability
There are many people in the United states who have been convicted of a crime, but later proven innocent, and due to this their lives are ruined. Every state needs to work to help those people get back on their feet, giving compensation, firing those who, unjustly, put them in prison, and help with housing and a job. Those who have been proven innocent should be compensated because the time they spend in prison will cause them to lose their jobs, and have no source of salary to support themselves. If the judge sentenced someone to prison, knowing they are innocent, they should be sent to fired, and legally unable to become a judge anywhere else, and spend time in prison, and the same should go to police officers who abuse their power. There’s …show more content…
a high chance that the people who have been proven innocent won’t get their jobs back, and if they don’t have anyone they will lose their homes, and because of this the government should pay for apartments for them, and have someone to help them find a job. It’s hard enough spending time in prison for a crime you didn’t commit, but not to get compensated for anything is a bigger slap to the face. Some states have some compensation, others have no kind of compensation for those have been proven innocent of crime, but all states should give compensations for them. When it comes to per year, I believe fair compensation is about sixty thousand a year, along with five thousand a month spent in prison. This amount is fair for a number of reasons, like the lost of a job will affect those who don’t have much money. A lost of a job, won’t allow someone to buy the necessary items they need daily, and any amount they have, before they were sent to prison, won’t be enough to live off until they find a new home. Those who don’t have a home to go to, but spent years in prison need that much money to help them find a new home, along with food that they need to survive. Walter Mcmillian spent six years behind bars, lost his home, his family didn’t want him near for a while, and lost his home, ruining his life. Six years in prison, with sixty thousand dollars per year would be three hundred sixty thousand dollars and with that anyone can start to rebuild their life. If someone spends a year and a month in prison, the compensation should be sixty-five thousand, and even if someone a year and two weeks in prison, they should get the money for the whole month, or at the very least a fraction of five thousand.
Anyone who spends eleven months and two weeks in prison will be given the sixty thousand, all do with fairness to the person, and also as an apology from the state. Sixty thousand seems like a bit much, and it won’t just come out of taxpayers’ pockets, because it won’t stop the police, and judges, from imprisoning innocent people. Instead the money will come from: police station’s budget, judges wallet, budget and donation from prisons and just a bit from taxpayers. Police stations will pay thirty-five percent of the sixty thousand, which will be twenty-one thousand, and the judges will also pay thirty-five percent. They will pay for a majority of the money because they are most responsible for imprisoning an innocent person. This will teach them to be careful, and try to make sure they don’t purposely convict an innocent man. The prisons these people stay in will pay twenty-five percent of the sixty thousand, which would be fifteen thousand, and they won’t be allowed to use the money meant to be used for the prisoners, like food budget. Conditions in prisons are horrible, and those who are innocent may be harassed, or worse, by an inmate, and for this reason they will pay twenty-five percent. This percentage can be thirty five, and the judges will be twenty-five, depending if on how the person was treated in prison, and if it was an honest mistake of the judge. Lastly, the taxpayers will only pay five percent, which will be three thousand. The people’s money shouldn’t spend much of the compensation because the police arrested an innocent man. Any money still missing will be paid by the police, judges, or the
prison. The police force, and judges, have a high chance of being corrupt, or abuse their power, because they want to be, or they are being paid off by someone. They shouldn’t be treated like they are above the law, and shouldn’t be safe from punishment. Police and judges shouldn’t just pay for most of the compensation, they need to be punished and be shown little mercy for destroying innocent lives, and being responsible for sending them to prison.One of their punishments will not only be being fired, but also being legally unable to pursue a job as a police officer, or a judge again. The reason for this is to make sure they won’t go back to their corrupt ways once they find the same job somewhere else. For example, in Just Mercy, there’s a corrupt officer named Mr.Tate, and for twenty-five years, he has been head of the police, when he should be in prison for helping to falsely convict an innocent man. They shouldn’t be allowed to go back to that job at all and if they try to they should be fined or spend time in prison. This way the number of corrupt police officers and judges will drop dramatically, and will make sure no more police officers and judges become corrupt. The other punishment they will be prison time for sending innocent people to prison. Their time in prison will be be either equal to the time the person they sent to prison had spent or at the very minimum four years in prisons. It should be four years because destroying someone’s life should have a heavy punishment and there is no telling how many people they have sent to prison. These punishments are to make sure that those who imprison innocent people are sent to prison and punished for their crimes. Many people are sent to prison, even though they are sent to prison, and because of this they can lose their money, job and even their home. With no money, they can’t live a normal life and will most likely become homeless. This will increase the number of homeless people in America, and will cause them to commit crimes just to survive. During the time someone spends in prison, they might end up losing their house, even if they do have family they could live with there is a chance that they won’t be allowed to live with them, or their family won’t help them at all. If you spend enough time away from your work, chances are that you will get fired, even if the reason is that they were sent to prison. Losing their job will affect them greatly because they will lose their source of income, which leads to becoming homeless, and then leads to them committing crimes in order to survive. Even if they get compensation, most people wouldn’t hire someone who has been to prison, even if they are innocent, and without being able to get a job, they won’t be able sustain their way of life. Walter McMillian was sent to prison for six years, and in those six years, he lost the business he owned and personally built, lost his home with family not wanting to help and he had little to no money. In the documentary “Making a Murderer” Steven Avery spent eighteen years in prison, and if he didn’t own land, or his own business, he would have lost his job and his home. These people shouldn’t be forced to use their compensation to find a place to live and get food until he got a proper job to support themselves. When it comes to getting a home, the state should assign someone to help these people find a new home, if they need a home, and pay for their rent until they get a new job. When it comes to a job, the state should either offer them a job, or help them find a job, and keep doing so until they get a job. Once they get a proper job, then the state can stop paying for that persons rent. With the loss of a job and a home,people will have no choice but to commit crimes in order to survive, but id the state helps people find jobs and homes then the crime rate might lower. Also, all records of them being in prison should be erased from their records and stop media from portraying them as criminals. We see the news paint everyone who has been arrested as a monster who deserves to be there, but at times those people are innocent and don’t deserve to be sent to prison. There are hundreds of innocent people in prison who have spent months, some even years,and in that time, their lives are being destroyed. In some cases, the police and judges know they are innocent but go for a conviction for one reason or another, and even if that person is found innocent those officers and judges aren’t punished. The officers and judges involved should be fired and banned from becoming an officer or judge ever again, along with spending time in prison for knowingly sending an innocent person to prison, If the judge made a mistake and didn’t mean to send an innocent man to prison, at most he should pay for compensation for that man. After that person is released from prison they should be given sixty thousand dollars per year and five thousand per month as compensation. Thirty-five percent should be paid by the police stations budget, thirty-five percent from the judges paycheck, twenty-five percent from the prison budgets and donation and five prevent from taxpayer money. Since they will most likely have no home, or job, the state should help them find a home, and pay for their rent until they are able to help that person find a new job. There needs to be careful measurements to make sure no innocent person is sent to prison, because if they are sent to prison their lives might be ruined.
One claim said that citizens pay around “$30,000 per inmate each year” (Jacoby 197). This grasps the reader’s attention by connecting their life to the problem; it is their money, a lot of their money, being used to imprison these criminals. The rates have increased on inmates since the 1980s by over 250% (Jacoby 1997). Jacoby declares that the prison system is terrible; he uses accurate and persuading evidence. According to Jacoby, flogging is faster, cheaper, and a more effective alternative to prison.
Prison litigation is a form of lawsuit process with which prisoners seek relief from prison. The Prison litigation Reform Act clearly outlines an increase in the litigation of prison cases that was enacted in 1996. Through such litigations, inmates are able to fight for their rights and fair treatment in prison. For instance among the prison ligations, we have prospective relieve where one can file a lawsuit to request the prison to change some of their policies to let one for example pray amongst groups. Exhaustion of remedies for administration also allows for one to articulate grievances against the prison official before suing them. Emotional or mental injuries are among other issues of prison litigation addressed in this prison litigation
Cohen (1985) supports this sentiment, and suggests that community based punishment alternatives have actually led to a widening and expansion of the retributive criminal justice system, rather than its abolishment. The current criminal justice system is expensive to maintain. In North America, the cost to house one prisoner is upwards of eighty to two hundred dollars a day (Morris, 2000). The bulk of this is devoted to paying guards and security (Morris, 2000).
Upon examination, one finds capital punishment to be economically weak and deficient. A common misconception of the death penalty is that the cost to execute a convicted criminal is cheaper than to place a convict in prison for life without parole. Due to the United States judicial system, the process of appeals, which is inevitable with cases involving death as the sentence, incurs an extreme cost and is very time consuming. The cost of a capital trial and execution can be two to six times greater than the amount of money needed to house and feed a prisoner for life. "Studies show incarceration costs roughly $20,000 per inmate per year ($800,000 if a person lives 40 years in prison). Research also shows a death-penalty ease costs roughly $2 million per execution," (Kaplan 2). Capital punishment is extremely expensive and depletes state governments of money that could be used for a wide range of programs that are beneficial. As Belolyn Wiliams-Harold, an author for the journal Black Enterprise, writes that county governments are typically responsible for the costs of prosecution and the costs of the criminal trial, including attorney's fees, and salaries for the members of the courtroom. All this money is spent at the expense of the corrections department and crime prevention programs, which are already is strapped for cash (Williams-Harlod 1). These "financial constraints," such as capital punishment, do not promote a healthy, commercial society, but actually cost and harm the public.
The American people rely on the justice system set up by our founding fathers to uphold certain standards of fairness and equality. Society is brainwashed into believing that the justice system is to flaw and bad people are supposed to go to jail. However, this has not been the case for many years due to corruption in the Supreme Court followed by the Federal Courts and other inferior state courts. The American justice system has taken on a life of its own, following theories of fairness that are no longer connected to the needs of a free society. Instead of a justice system that weeds out the good from the evil, power has been given to the prosecutors, finding a good lawyer is harder than it seems, and rules have become unconstitutional.
Within our police system in America, there are gaps and loopholes that give leeway to police officials who either abuse the authority given to them or do not represent the ethical standards that they are expected to live up to by society. Because of the nature of police work, there is a potential for deterioration of these ethical and moral standards through deviance, misconduct, corruption, and favoritism. Although these standards are set in place, many police officers are not held accountable for their actions and can easily get by with the mistreatment of others because of their career title. While not every police abuses his or her power, the increasingly large percentage that do present a problem that must be recognized by the public as well as those in charge of police departments throughout our country. Police officials are abusing their power and authority through three types of misconduct known as malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance and these types are being overlooked by management personnel who rarely intervene even though they know what is happening. Misconduct is wrong because it violates rights and causes people to be wrongly accused of crimes or be found not guilty and set free when they are still an endangerment to other people. The public needs to be educated on what is happening in the police system in hopes that someone will speak out to protect citizens from being violated by police officers.
Prisons require an abundance of money to be run properly and effectively. By using taxes to pay for prisons the American public pays to support the lives of inmates and all of their needs. Prisoners require food, drink, beds, supplies for doing other activities and all of the overlooked things in normal life that go along with these necessities. Inmates have special needs like all of us do. Inmates reguire medical care, for example some have AIDS or other diseases that require medicine which cumulate large bills over time.(Luzadder) Imagine the money amassed over a life sentence of paying for medicine. The American public pays for all of these expenses added to the actual building of the prison f...
Living in the twenty first century Americans would like to believe that they are living in the land of the free, where anyone and everyone can live an ordinary life without worrying that they will be arrested on the spot for doing absolutely nothing. The sad truth, with the evidence to prove it, is that this American Dream is not all that it appears to be. It has been corrupted and continues to be everyday by the racism that is in the criminal justice system of America. Racism has perpetuated the corruption of the criminal justice system from aspect of the initial stop, the sentencing in court, all the way to the life of an inmate in the prison. There seems to be nothing stopping it as it continues to grow
As many people begin to examine the debate of whether or not the death penalty should be inflicted upon those who commit such heinous crimes in the United States, are finding flaws in the system. One of those flaws being that the cost of executing someone on death row is much higher than someone sentenced to life-without-parole. This may come as a shock to many people due to the fact that it costs a sufficient amount of money to provide food, shelter, and security to the people sentenced to a lifetime in prison. This forces much of society to question whether such funds
Discrimination against the minority population is a major problem in the United States society’s justice system. There are many examples where African American and low-income minorities are treated differently and not given the chance to prove their innocence. The law enforcement promises to treat all men or women equal opportunity, but the same system has put 120,000 innocent African Americans in prison. While most of them still remain in prisons, injustice by law enforcements is still a burden to the minorities in America. Moreover, wrongful conviction is a horrible injustice when a person spends years in jail. This is getting recognized by the U.S. system but often late. In many cases by the time a person is proven innocent, he or she might
The justice system in America is a failure and should be immediately reformed to a more standardized system that encourages reform over punishment. This is clearly evidenced by the 76.6% of prisoners that are rearrested within five years of release, the inequality of sentencing based on race or socioeconomic class, and the widely varying prison terms, which in many cases do not fit the crimes committed.
A few issues are the police officers themselves, the court system, and simply knowing what to do in certain situations. I have three recommendations that help these issues such as body cameras, a special court system, and retraining police officers. First, the body camera idea has been floating around the news lately. As previously stated, President Obama has funded these cameras and they will be implemented soon, however, I would like to recommend on how to use them. The camera could be on the waist of the officer along with their utility belt. The cameras must be turned on during their shift and turned off at the end. At the end of the day, someone will review the camera footage and write reports on the officers. The pros of this recommendation is the feedback and seeing the actions of the police officers to be used in the courts, while the cons could be people inferring with the footage or the officers blocking the camera somehow. The cost of these cameras is the consequence, because there are an abundance of police stations and for every cop to have a body camera would cost millions of dollars. My second recommendation would be establishing a special court system that handles murders committed by police officers. The judge could review the body camera tape, hear both sides, and then make his or her decision. It could reduce rioting and uproar within communities. A pro of this court system is simply
Nowadays how many people remember the story of Rodney King? The Rodney King beating was the incident that really brought to the public eye the extremes some police take their brand of justice. Every day now you hear more and more stories of the increasing amounts of police brutality at it does not seem to be stopping. We can always argue that the police are justified in their sometimes questionable methods in stopping criminals, but they do not all fall under this category. As Terry Mark once said “Thinking before acting is wisdom, but acting before thinking is regret.” Most cops could be said to embody the latter portion of that quote. There must be more done to curb the amount of cases that get reported. There are many ways to address this
The research study is to describe how there are more African Americans in prison than any other race Whether it is African American men or women in the prison African Americans are still the leading race inside the prison system. Based upon the research I was setting out to prove that African Americans were the leading race in the prison systems, but sometimes people don’t always understand why or how some people economic status and education can play a hug part on where the direction of their lives take them. The main in this study was to determine if African Americans are the leading race in the prison system. So I set out to find out if “there are more African Americans from ages eighteen thru thirty are in prison at a greater percentage than White or Hispanics”. Imprisonment was and still is a form of criminal punishment that became well known in the United States after the American Revolution.
Our laws have allowed individuals to slip through the cracks of our justice system. Criminals who have raped and killed have walked on technicalities. The results have left the officers with a sense of failure by the system. Some police officers have taken matters in their own hands.