Are We Doing Enough To Combat Climate Change

1283 Words3 Pages

The most hot button issue in today’s global affairs is the rapid effects of climate change. Over 99% of climate scientists agree that the effects of human activity are causing the world to heat up at alarming rates. All the major nations in the world, bar the United States, have a consensus that there is a problem and we need to solve it. So what exactly is being done to combat the problem? Is the international community doing enough to limit the future problems that could arise if there are not any changes made? There is no overwhelming consensus on whether the policy taken to fight climate change is effective or not, but there are two sides to the issue: yes, what we are doing is helping, and no, we are not doing enough to help. The first …show more content…

I few the problem of climate change as the more important universal problem facing the world today. Those in charge rather stay with the status quo so that they do not have to make any revolutionary changes. The major effects of climate change will not occur during their lifetime, so they rather pass it on to the next generation in line. I also agree with their views of the inefficiency of the Kyoto Protocol. All of these factors, and more, and the reasons why I view the currant climate policy is not enough to combat climate …show more content…

Leiserowitz is a professor at Yale University and believes taking more policy measures in the United States towards a greener nation is not what lawmakers should be doing, and not what they want to do. He claims that public opinion for any leaders who pushes America away from the same levels of greenhouse gases would decline, due to the overwhelming dependence and production of these gases (Leiserowitz, 2006). Also, it is very expensive to transition to cleaner energy, according to Leiserowitz, and neither the government nor the businesses would want to pick up the tab. The concern about the loss of jobs in the energy field is a question of concern as well, because so many people work in coal, crude oil, fracking, and other energy dependents, that transitioning to clean energy would cause unemployment. The American voters themselves would much rather kick the can down the road than actually take these issue head on, and if someone is running on the idea of changing the whole way the United States’ energy is ran, it would be hard to rally up public support for them (Leiserowitz, 2006). Leiserowitz sees the costs fossil fuels as the main reason why nothing has been done in the United States. Eleanor Denny and Jurgen Weiss view a lot of positives with not rushing to make major changes in environmental policy. They

Open Document