Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology advancement ww 1
The effect of the second world war
The effect of the second world war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Technology advancement ww 1
Are Wars As Wrongful As They Seem? The idea of going to war never seems like a good one, but if World War Two didn’t exist the world wouldn’t be the same. Just wars like World War Two have been seen many times throughout history and without them who knows what the world would be today. War is a devastating problem that has existed all throughout the world, yet despite this fact people are still driven to go to war. Although war’s more severe effects (including death and future struggle between nations) often are considered to outweigh the benefits, from certain perspectives, such as a leader or government, war can be considered just and viewed as favorable for a society who wants to gain power or stop an opposing force, or for the entire world. …show more content…
Many wars stop an opposing threat, help a country grow or even keep the world from being destroyed. World War One had many awful traits, but in general World War One is considered just for a variety of reasons. The first and one of the most prominent reasons is because, “The League of Nations came into being at the end of the war with the aim of preventing future war” (Pettinger, Positive aspects of the First World War). The creation of The League of Nations is an amazingly beneficial outcome of World War One because it induced countries from all around the world to work together and make decisions together based on mutually agreed on rules. It was the blueprint for the modern day United Nations. The First World War can also be considered just because of what it did for the world, “If Germany had defeated Belgium and France, modern Europe would have been dominated by a militaristic German who would have treated conquered nations as vassal states” (Pettinger, Positive aspects of the First World War). Without the Treaty of Versailles to limit Germany’s military might and strong economy, the world could have been engulfed by the German military. A third benefit of World War One was the new advancements made in technology, even though many of them were developed to kill, this technology bettered life in the long run.
Airplanes,
…show more content…
The Russian Revolution was initially perceived to be a just war by the people but in hindsight the transition from a Czarist rule to a Communist one wasn’t that desirable. The one major positive outcome that came out of the revolution was the removal of the Czarist rule. Before the revolution, “[Russia] lacked good leadership. Tsar Nicholas II (r. 1894 – 1917) had complete control over the bureaucracy and the army. He refused to share his power and the masses began to question his leadership”(Fernholz, The Russian Revolution of 1917). Russia was missing a good ruler and system of government they needed something new, this new system of government that they needed was communism. Communism seemed like a great alternative to the rule of Czar Nicholas II, but after experiencing Communism most of the world realized how horrible it could be. The fact that Russia had it’s abominable Czarist rule replaced made the war seem just at first, but the change from the Czarist rule to Communism makes the war have a less beneficial outcome than originally sought
War is the means to many ends. The ends of ruthless dictators, of land disputes, and lives – each play its part in the reasoning for war. War is controllable. It can be avoided; however, once it begins, the bat...
War is an organized and often prolonged conflict by a leader that is carried out by states or non-state actors and is generally characterized by extreme violence, social disruption and economic destruction. Now, some may say that war is needed for a country to succeed as would the Italian philosopher by the name Nicollo Machiavelli who explains characteristics and plans that these war leaders must follow in order to succeed. However, some also may say that war is a path of evil and a country should live in peace as taught by an ancient Chinese philosopher by the name of Lao Tzu. Equally important that these two different ideals may be, countries can use some of the ideas from both philosophers to help in times of battle.
Orend, Brian. "War." Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford University, 28 July 2005. Web. 19 Apr. 2014.
War is a hard thing to describe. It has benefits that can only be reaped through its respective means. Means that, while necessary, are harsh and unforgiving. William James, the author of “The Moral Equivalent of War”, speaks only of the benefits to be had and not of the horrors and sacrifices found in the turbulent times of war. James bears the title of a pacifist, but he heralds war as a necessity for society to exist. In the end of his article, James presents a “war against nature” that would, in his opinion, stand in war’s stead in bringing the proper characteristics to our people. However, my stance is that of opposition to James and his views. I believe that war, while beneficial in various ways, is unnecessary and should be avoided at all costs.
The word “War” sends shivers through many people because of the effect war has on individual groups or people, minorities, soldiers and the society.
World war 1 was a brutal war that could have been prevented if Germany didn’t strike back at the assassination of the Arch Duke Franz. Once Germany invaded Poland the war broke out to a horrifying fight that impacted every country. The united states happened to have been the least effected by the war and actually grew richer by selling goods and needs to other countries. America was viewed as a savior of Europe. Speed up American industrial production and performance was better than ever. Leading to the economic boom and the roaring twenties.
World War I caused a lot of damage to different countries and the Treaty of Versailles punished Germany harshly for starting the war. In the years following the war, Hitler and the Nazi Party rose to power and gained control of Germany and its government. Also, the League of Nations was set up to help keep peace between countries.
The question "Can war be justified?" plagued mankind since the first war. The Just War Theory holds that war can be just. The theory has evolved for thousands of years and modern theorists, such as Michael Walzer, author of Just and Unjust Wars, put forth criteria for a just war, such as jus ad bellum and jus in bello. Jus ad bellum includes reasons for going to war, and jus in bello deals with the people who wage war. The criteria in jus ad bellum include: just cause, declaration by a proper authority, right intention, a reasonable chance of success, the end proportional to the means, and war as a last resort.
Before we even look at World War 1, we need to fully understand the importance of the rise of militarism, imperialism and nationalism. You may as yourself, why is this important? This is important because these ideologies led the Great War. There are a lot of similarities
If we look at the history of the world with a kaleidoscope, we can see the different aspects of war and what effect it had on the minds of different people and artists such as poets, painters and authors. Many poets romanticized war, luring it with their pen and giving it a beautiful look by glorifying death and obliging young blood to fight for their motherland. For example, the poems “Peace” by Rupert Brooke and “Fall In” by Harold Begbie painted war with the highlights of glamorous and sensation. Apart from poets, there are also politicians who achieved their aims with the help of war and violence, while others who used the weapons of non-violence to achieve their goals. The most famous example is of Adolf Hitler, who took the aid of war to conquer the territories.
War is a mean to achieve a political goal.it is merely the continuation of policy in a violent form. “War is not merely an act of policy, but a true political instrument....” Moreover, the intensity of war will vary with the nature of political motives. This relationship makes war a rational act rather than a primitive and instinctive action, where war uses coercion to achieve political goals instead of use it only for destruction, and it cannot be separated from each other even after the war has started, when each side is allowed to execute its requisite responsibilities while remaining flexible enough to adapt to emerging
Every day we are surrounded by stories of war. In fact, we have become so accustomed to it, that we are now entertained by it. Video games, movies, and books filled with heroes who once dominated the battlefields. However it is constantly stated, “no good comes from war.” Even famous songs state “war... what is it good for… absolutely nothing.” But what if war was actually necessary? Throughout history, we see examples of the good things wars have brought. War has freed slaves, modernized medicine, brought down evil empires, and even brought countries together
War is not always unavoidable. Many wars were and are caused by these reasons. World War I and Cold War are a main part of evidence because many things caused the war and that shows a lot about war. During these wars, the circumstances got so poor that some soldiers said that they have seen war but have not seen the desires people had. Also people saw no solution for this war because of how serious and big it got.
War is controversial, unfortunate, and certainly misunderstood; it is a transforming agent, a catalyst for change. Nonetheless, many people focus on war's negative consequences, while positive effects are downplayed. War is a necessary evil in the sense that it stabilizes population, encourages technological advances, and has a very high economic value. Without war, the overpopulation of the human race is inevitable. It is this reason that war is a useful tool by not only Mother Nature, but also humans themselves to institute population control.
War has been around for centuries. From the time modern civilizations began, war has played an integral part in human history. It shaped the world into the modern world we live in. War has been said to be a great motivator, for example, the Great Wall of China was built to fend off the attackers from the north. However, the negative aspects of war far outweighs any positive effects it might have. The destruction of civilizations, cities and countries, mass killings of men, woman and children alike, the disastrous effect it has on economy and the after effects of war can last for centuries.