Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparation of uk party system with usa party system
Decline of political parties
Decline of political parties
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparation of uk party system with usa party system
The debate is often made that politics is rapidly becoming unpopular, unattractive and is ultimately shown to be out of favour with the masses, and this can be said to be reflected upon, and arguably due to, the traditional political parties in Great Britain. In order to receive a clearer picture of this shift in the political landscape the previously less mainstream parties must be entered into the discourse, and the changing behaviour of the voters in response to such movements must also be addressed. The case will be argued that the decline in traditional parties such as Labour and the Conservatives has some link to the rise of the UK Independence Party (Ukip) and the Respect party. The concept of the traditional parties and their failings to satisfy the electorate's demands for a fairer society and a substantially more stable economy is similarly important when inspecting the accelerated decline in support of the main parties. The works of academics contrast greatly in opinion on the decline of traditional parties, with many arguing that the change in the political landscape is only natural, and with many opposing this view point (and condemning the shift and the fall in political participation).
In recent years Great Britain has seen a rapid change in the participation in British General elections and has witnessed the stagnation of British voting behaviour in European elections. Statistics show that there has been nearly a 10% decrease in turnout for general elections since 1997; the electorate turnout in 1997 stood at 71.4% with the first election of Tony Blair. (UK Political Info). In 2001 the turnout hit a a major low at just 59.4% (the lowest recorded since 1918). From this point onwards the decrease in turnout re...
... middle of paper ...
... fallen out of favour with the people. It has been demonstrated that the fall in support for traditional parties has not had any negative impact on the previously smaller parties. Membership statistics also indicate the rapid decline in traditional parties, again highlighting that the electorate's demands may be better addressed in other ways. A more clarified picture now remains of the political landscape in relation to the terminal decline of traditional parties, and as to the British political system as a whole. Many points can be taken from this, but the one thing that should be noted is that the decline of the traditional parties may not be such an issue as previously presumed. This may be the people asking for change, thus in order to gain the support they once had, the traditional parties must begin to take note, or else face many unprosperous years ahead.
The conservative party has been in existence since the 1670s and was first called the ‘Tories’, a term used by the Scottish and Irish to describe a robber. This party is a right- wing party which believed in conserving the tradition and the king, as the name entails. David Cameron, the current party leader became the leader in 2005. He is also the present prime minister of Great Britain and he has made a lot of changes since he became the leader of the party. In this essay, I will talk about the history of the party, looking into detail at their gradual changes or transition in ideology and the various changes that David Cameron has made to the party’s image and beliefs.
Pammett, Jon, and Lawrence LeDuc. 2003. Explaining the Turnout Decline in Canadian Federal Elections: A New Survey of Non-Voters. Ottawa: Elections Canada.
"Miller light and bud light…either way you end up with a mighty weak beer!" This is how Jim Hightower (a Texan populist speaker) described the choices that the U.S. electorate had in the 2000 elections. This insinuates that there is a clear lack of distinction between the parties. Along with numerous others, this is one of the reasons why the turnout is so low in the U.S. elections. In trying to explain the low figures at the U.S. elections, analysts have called American voters apathetic to indifferent to downright lazy. I disagree that the 50% (in recent elections) of voters that fail to turnout to vote are lazy and that they have just reason not too. I will also show that the problem lies within the system itself in that the institutional arrangements, electoral and governmental, do not create an environment that is conducive to mass participation. I will address these main issues and several others that have an effect on voter participation. In doing so I will compare America to other established democracies.
The United States national elections have been experiencing a steady decline of eligible voters showing up to vote. This steady decline has been ongoing since experiencing a significant increase in voter turnout from 1948 through 1960. Over the years there has been significant, meticulous research done to try to pinpoint the cause of the decline in voter turnout over years. All of this research has led to the production of an enormous number of literatures written on the perceived causes. The vast amount of literature produced has led to a number of competing explanations about this decline. The quest for the answer to the question of, why this decline in voter turnout, is very important for an overwhelming majority of Americans and our democratic system because the people/voters can only truly be represented by our government if all eligible voters go out and vote. For this paper I will examine four theories that attempt to explain the decline. The four theories that I will discuss are voting barriers, campaign contributions, negative campaign advertising, and finally the cultural explanation. However, through thorough exploration and critiques of the strengths and weaknesses of these four theories, we will find that the cultural explanation theory is currently the most persuasive theory in the group. Finally, I will also explore some reasons as to why citizens do vote as well.
Among the many ways Americans can participate in politics, voting is considered one of the most common and important ways for Americans to get involved. The outcome of any election, especially at the national level, determines who will be making and enforcing the laws that all Americans must abide by. With this in mind one might assume that all Americans are active voters, but studies show the voter turnout is actually astonishingly low. With this unsettling trend it is important to know what statistics say about voter turnout as was as the four major factors that influence participation: Socioeconomic status, education, political environment, and state electoral laws, in order to help boost turnout in future elections.
that because a party can raise money year in and year out (in fact the money is
middle of paper ... ... d therefore the smaller parties can be considered to have very little effect on the overall political situation. In conclusion, the UK can still best be described as a two party system, provided two considerations are taken into account. The first is that Conservative dominance victories between 1979-97 was not a suggestion of party dominance and that eventually, the swing of the political pendulum will be even for both sides. This can perhaps be seen today with Labour's two landslide victories in 1997 and 2001.
Pammett, J., & LeDuc, L. (2003). Explaining turnout decline in Canadian federal elections: A survey of non-voters. Elections Canada, 40.
Voter turnout, according to the text, “. . .means the portion of the eligible citizens who actually cast ballots--not the portion of those registered, . . . (142).” Data reveals that the voter turnout of Texas is relatively lower than that of the United States as a whole. During presidential elections, voter turnout is higher than that of state and local elections. For example, the text states that in the 2008 presidential balloting, Texas voter turnout was about eight percentage points below the national turnout level(142). However, the voter turnout of the United States compared to that of other countries is lower than the global level. In a graph presented for voter turnout rate of registered voters, the United States is located on the bottom of the list. From U.S News, Flock states,“The U.S has one of the lowest voter turnout rates of any rich democracy in the world(Flock).” Factors that influence voting around the world, for example, may be the choice to submit a vote online, such as in India, rather than going into a v...
Political parties have been around since almost the beginning of this great country. Although George Washington strongly opposed political parties, and also warned the nation to stay away from forming political parties, the first political parties were formed right under his own nose. In George Washington’s cabinet was where the first parties started. The cause of these parties was simply differences in views. The thought of leaders of these two completely different parties was Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson started what then was known of as Republican or the Anti-Federalist. On the other hand Hamilton started what was known of as the Federalist Party. Both of these parties formed in the seventeen hundreds. These two parties have evolved into today being known as the Democratic, and the Republican parties. On the contrary one of the largest third party groups, the tea party was formed just recently in the year two thousand and nine. All three of these political parties effect our government today.
1992 is a year of change for England. The Norsefire party, lead by Adam Sutler, has come into power in the most recent election. With 87% of the votes this party beat the Conservative party and the Labour party by a landslide.
The United States presidential election of 2012 was the 57th presidential election. The election was held on Tuesday, November 6, 2012. The Democratic political leader was the incumbent President Barack Obama, and his candidate was vice President Joe Biden. Throughout this election the proportion of eligible voters who cast ballots shows that the rate was lower than in the past two presidential elections. Voter turnout decreased from 62.3 percent of eligible citizens voting in 2008 to an estimated 57.5 in 2012. The above calculation was also below the 60.4 percent in 2004 election, however above the 54.2 percent turnout in the 2000 election. Despite a rise of over eight million voters within the fitted population, turnout dropped from 131 million voters in 2008 to an estimated 126 million voters in 2012. When all ballots were computed, some 93 million eligible voters didn’t vote. There must be some contributing factors to see why there's a decline in voters’ turnout.
Assessment of the View that Liberalism has Triumphed as the Dominant Ideology in Contemporary British Politics
Though the Representation of the People Act 1918 was significant reason for the decline of the Liberals and the rise of the Labour Party in the years 1918-1929 it was however not the main reason, the concept of Unity within the three most prevalent parties in Britain( Conservatives, Labour, and Liberal )was. This essay will explore and evaluate the reasons for the descent of Liberal Party and the ascension of the Labour Party by exploring the significance of each reason being: the concept of Unity, the 1918 Representation of the People Act, Economic Problems and lastly Opposition towards the Liberals.
This essay will argue that independents and minor parties improve the quality of representative democracy with a focus on the federal political system of Australia. In arguing from this viewpoint, the features of a representative democracy must first be established, where the core of this debate stems from concerns as to whether Australia’s political stance stands as a pendulum democracy or consensus democracy. This essay presents the view that the Australian federal system leans towards a consensus democracy, thus the remainder of the essay will focus on whether independents and minor parties improve the quality of consensual representative democracy in Australia. Firstly it will be argued that minor parties and independents enhance the multi-party feature of representative democracy (Vatter 2009), that also improves minority rights. Secondly, independents and minor parties have increased accountability of the government, through their involvement in the Senate (Thompson 1999). Lastly, it is argued that minor parties and independents improve mirror representation (Catt 1999, p. 91) and foster the best interests of society, and hence improves representative democracy.