Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Brief overview of alternative dispute resolution
What is the difference between negotiation mediation arbitration
Brief overview of alternative dispute resolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Brief overview of alternative dispute resolution
Arbitration is a form of dispute method that seeks to bind parties to the arbitration. Lord Bingham defines arbitration being an “appointment of an independent arbitrator, often chosen by the parties, to rule on their dispute according to the terms of reference they give him. This can only be done by agreement, before or after the dispute arises, but where it is done the arbitrator has authority to make an award which is binding on the parties and enforceable by process of the courts”. Arbitration differs from litigation as only the parties to an arbitration agreement may be subject to the jurisdiction of the arbitrator. Whereas in litigation parties may be brought into ligation despite there will of not wanting to be involved.
Concept
…show more content…
The parties in the contract must look at the content arbitration clause. In John Holland Pty Ltd v Kellogg’s Brown & Root Pty Ltd (2015) it was held that the parties must look at the arbitration clause as disputes arise “under” or arising out of” or “in connection with” the contract. In 1144 Nepean Highway Pty Ltd v Leigh Marden Australasia Pty Ltd [2009] VSC 226 it was held that the words ‘arising out of’ can generally be given a wide …show more content…
The House of Lord in the UK took the approach that an agreement to arbitrate an intention to have all disputes relating to a contract including it legality resolved by arbitration. In Victoria we take the approach taken in TCL Air Conditioner (Zhongshan) Co Ltd v Castel Electronics Pty Ltd [2009] VSC 553 “In case there is any breach of the provisions under this Agreement by either party during the effective period of this Agreement the parties hereto shall, first of all, try to settle the matter in question as soon and amicable as possible to mutual satisfaction or if not so settled within 60 days such matters will be referred to arbitration in Territory for resolution”. Justice Hargrave determined that the wording in the TCL limited the dispute clause as it arose under the distribution agreement and Justice Hargrave made it clear by saying that the interpretation of such clauses was not subject to any
Equuscorp launched proceedings in the Supreme Court of Victoria against each of the respondents. Equuscorp’s claims were for “loss and damage” for breach of the loan agreements and for money had and received. The trial judge dismissed Equuscorp’s contractual claim in all eight cases and upheld the restitution claim in two cases. The respondents appealed this decision in the Supreme Court of Victoria’s Court of Appeal. In this appeal, the majority held that the trial judge erred and that Equuscorp was not entitled to restitution. Equuscorp appealed against the decision of the Court of Appeal in relation to the three respondents. Its grounds for appeal included that the Court of Appeal erred in deciding: a) that Equuscorp was not entitled to restitution for the unenforceable loan agreements; b) that it was not unjust for the respondents to keep the amounts pursuant to the unenforceable loan agreements; and c) that restitution was not assigned as a right or remedy to recover the amounts under the unenforceable loan agreements.
In this case entitled Gulash v. Stylarama there was a contract entered regarding the construction of pools. The pool was built and constructed but after a period of time the pool began to tilt, in which that’s when Gulash decided to sue Stylarama. The suit was that Stylarama violated provisions of article 2 of the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code). Due to the fact the cost of the materials and the labor were not written out in detail but instead of in a lump sum it would make it hard to come up with a sum for the exact cost of the damages. Furthermore, since this is a contract with a mix of goods and services, article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code would not apply the services only to the goods but the common law would to the services. And
With commercial dealings on the rise in Australia and globally, so too are the complications. If some sort of codification is not established and built from the principals that already exist, commercial opportunities could be in jeopardy due to the uncertainty and risk of not having a clear outline or set of laws to cover contracts generally.
Macintyre, S. (1987), Holt and the Establishment of Arbitration: An Australian Perspective, New Zealand Journal of Industrial Relations, 12(3): 151-159.
Andrews N, Strangers to Justice No Longer: The Reversal of the Privity Rule under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (2001) 60 The Cambridge Law Journal 353
Disputes are almost unavoidable between people when there are disagreements or misunderstandings. In the construction industry, contractual relationships could lead to dispute. To resolve disputes, construction disputes are most likely encouraged to use Alternative Dispute Resolutions such as arbitration, mediation, and mini-trials to resolve their disputes faster and keep the dispute confidential and at lower cost (Ray, 2000). The construction case presented in this paper first resorted to negotiation; however, it could not give the parties a resolution which led to a mini-trial.
Based on common law and precedent, the English law of contract has been formulated and developed over a number of years with it’s primary purpose to provide a regulated framework within which individuals can contract freely. In order to ensure a contract is enforceable there are certain elements which must be satisfied, one of which is the doctrine of consideration. Lord Denning famously professed; “the doctrine of consideration is too firmly fixed to be overthrown by a side wind” . This is a crucial indication that consideration has long been regarded as the cardinal ‘badge of enforceability’ in the formulation and variation of contracts in English common law.
Arbitration resembles traditional civil litigation in that a neutral intermediary hears the disputants' arguments and imposes a final and binding decision that is enforceable by the courts. One difference is that in arbitration the disputants elect to settle any future disputes by arbitration before a dispute actually arises, whereas with civil litigation the judicial system is generally chosen by a disgruntled party after a dispute has materialized. Another difference is that the disputants to an arbitration select the intermediary who will serve as arbitrator, whereas parties to civil litigation have little to no control over who will preside as the judge in judicial
In the past five decades, arbitration options are becoming more recognized and preferred. Contrary to the previous century, where only a few countries had well-developed practices and laws in place, virtually all countries across the world have made tremendous progress to entrench the precise. Before, courts were the only institutions in many countries that offered solutions to these disputes. The whole process was cumbersome and lengthy because the laws compelled witnesses to appear and the judgments were not enforceable. However, nowadays the case is different due to the growth of arbitral bodies which provides many alternatives for parties can select based on their needs. Some of these agencies deal with any dispute while others specialize in certain types of disputes that focuses on a topic like intellectual property or
Each clause in the contract will address a specific component related to the overall subject matter of the agreement. The role is to clearly define the duties, rights and privileges that each party has under the contract terms and conditions. Two examples of clauses are Time of Performance Clause and Arbitration Clause. Time of Performance Clauses designate time frames when contract duties have to be met. This contract relies on an action being performed within a specific period of time When time is of a factor and limited, a breach of contract can’t occur if the duties are not performed within a reasonable amount of time. This is only applicable if this clause is stated in the contract. An Arbitration Clause simply states that in case any legal differences or disputes between parties do happen, they must be resolved through arbitration in place of
Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR refers to a number of various processes that can be used to resolve legal disputes other than by litigation. Recently, methods of dispute resolution which focus on arbitration, mediation and negotiation as an alternative to adjudication have gained notoriety. This notoriety may have been caused by the public perception that ADR methods are less expensive, more efficient, and more satisfactory than the normal traditional course of litigation. The goals of establishing these processes to resolve disputes as an alternative to more formal legal processes include: 1) to make the regular court system more efficient, less costly and more responsive to the needs of the litigants; 2) to offer alternative methods of dispute resolution in addition to the regular court system; and 3) to provide public education about the available alternatives.
In Krell v. Henry {1903} a plea of frustration succeeded because the court held that the common purpose for which the contact was entered into, could no longer be carried out. But in the same year for similar set of facts, the Court of Appeal decided in Herne Bay v. Hutton [1903] that the contract had not been frustrated because the "common formation of the contract" had not changed. It clearly was a policy decision which shows the reluctance of the courts to provide an escape route for a party for whom the contract ha...
ADR holds an extensive, easily influenced and diverging choice of processes for finding solutions to disputes which are personified by structured negotiation and consensus. It is regarded that arbitration is a familiar ADR technique, however, it is more of an official adjudicative and adversary technique initially a confidential litigation process which has more commonality to litigation than the more original consensual processes which symbolise ADR. As simplified by Angyal (Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1987, p. 11). "The key difference between ADR and those traditional techniques of litigation and arbitration is that ADR techniques are used to produce a resolution to dispute through a negotiated agreement while litigation and arbitration are processes by which a result is imposed on the parties. " We can say that many issues arise with terms.
An arbitrator’s function is usually to interpret the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, not to apply his or her standards of what is right in a given situation. The courts have sought to compel labour and management to a peaceful resolution of grievances through arbitration. The Supreme Court has given support to the arbitration process in a series of decisions, and judicial deferral to arbitration has become a basic tenet of national labour policy. Bibliography Byars, L. L. (1997). The.
Arbitration is a “mechanism for the resolution of disputes which take place usually pursuant to an agreement between two or more parties, under which parties agree to be bound by the decision to be given by the Arbitrator according to law or, if so agreed, other considerations, after a fair hearing such decision being enforceable by law.” Arbitration is, therefore, a process of dispute resolution between the parties through Arbitral Tribunal appointed by the parties to the dispute or by the court at the request of concerned party.