Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on puritans in new england
The puritan movement
The rise of puritans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on puritans in new england
In The Arbella Sermon by John Winthrop in 1630, was a very inspiring sermon to read. Winthrop passion and desire to make New England a “city on the hill”, had a strong impact on the new settlers as they were determined to build a Christian community with biblical laws. They felt it was their responsibility to a beacon of light to the rest of the world. The sermon contained the roles of the rich and the poor, how they should treat others with kindness and how they should take care of each other. Overall, the sermon seemed to have good intentions and goals, however I question one of the requirements that was mentioned, “commanded to love his neighbor as himself.”, knowing that there would be quarrels and ill treatment of the Quakers in the future, makes me question how sincere and serious the Puritans were when loving their neighbors. Winthrop, expresses his desire for a unified group of …show more content…
people as they were all part of the “Body of Christ. Winthrop believed that by holding steadfast to these beliefs and laws they will avoid, “shipwreck” or corruption. The important part of the sermon was, “..keep his commandments and his his ordinance and his laws, and the articles of our covenant with him..” (pg.60), it is evident that the Puritans were passionate about following the ten commandments as they were carried into The Laws of Pennsylvania, 1682. Document four, The Laws of Pennsylvania, 1682 was a set of seventy-one specific laws that was mandatory for residents in Pennsylvania to follow and obey.
The author of the first legislature, William Penn uses sophisticated literature such as, “Almighty God of Conscience Father of Light & Spirits and the Author as as Object of all divine Knowledge Faith and Worship.” (pg.70), to stress that the foundation of the laws were based on Biblical contents and influence. For example, keeping the Sabbath Day, not being intoxicated, and one of the worst punishable law, adultery. Those who committed adultery are not only imprisoned for a year but also whipped publicly. The most important historical fact is that to be elected one must be a proclaimed Christian, own a hundred acres of land and pay the scott and lott (taxes). Therefore, those in authority tend to be ones with the most wealth, land and appear as powerful “saints”. Overall, I think that the Laws of Pennsylvania are very favorable to the Puritans or religious group that controlled the town at that
time. The article, A Key into the Language of America, 1643 by Roger Williams, was very fascinating to read and gave a different perspective of the Native Americans, which contrast to the usual pessimistic view of their savagery. It is clear that Roger Williams spent a considerable time with the natives, learning their traditions, beliefs and language. He compared how friendly the natives were to the English, “a man shall generally finde more free entertainment and refreshing amongst these Barbarians, then amongst thousands that call themselves Christians…”, Williams clearly mocks the English and calling them hypocrites as they didn’t practice hospitality or kindness like the Native Americans did. He even went further to express his dislike for the English culture, “monstrous fashion, as to the shame of the English Nation,..” (pg62), Williams believed that the English society was slowly degenerating. I think the most important information is how affectionate the Native American’s father were as they would loving spoil their children then discipline them and how they were unashamed to help their wives. Williams paints a beautiful picture of harmony and unity of the natives when they came together to socialize and to harvest. In my opinion, since there are many different types of Native Americans, there were different reactions to the new settlers, but the Williams encounter a very friendly tribe and it gave me a new image of male natives as loving and affectionate instead of the warlike attitude that we usually see. Lastly, the Testimony Against Accused Witch Bridget Bishop of 1692, was the hardest to read, because there were many innocent lives, especially females, that were taken. Even if they were guilty, there was not enough evidence to prove their guilty. There are many unbelievable stories in this document such as, John Cook and Samuel Gray being assaulted by Bridget Bishop many years earlier, a child being bewitched and a sow being cursed because there was a conflict on it’s price. This leads to one wondering if some of the accusers wanted to inflict Bishop, because they owe her money or maybe just fear her. Throughout the document, I question the accuser's motives and intentions of putting a fellow neighbor to death. It’s hard to believe that horror stories of people being bitten, choked and harassed to sign the “book” is enough evidence. “But there was no need for them.” (pg75), this quote shows that there were many more witnesses willing to accuse Bishop of witchcraft, therefore the people of Salem thought it was enough proof of Bishop’s witchcraft. From past research I know that some of the accusers wanted public attention or might even be paid for their accusations. Therefore the most important fact is that there was most likely no escape for Bridget Bishop. Even though she went to church, the number of her haters outweigh everything else.
many migrated to Philadelphia as they were lured by religious freedom (by William Penn in Pennsylvania)
As the regions began to expand and develop, their motivations for settlement helped to mold their societies. New England was a place where men sought refuge from religious persecution and was established as a haven for religious refugees. Despite this reason for settling, the New Englanders still attempted to spread their own beliefs of religion. As illustrated by John Winthrop in his Model of a Christian Charity, he preached to his fellow colonists that “we shall be a city upon a hill” (Doc A) exemplifying the Puritans’ aspirations of a Holy Utopia. He and countless other New Englanders practiced the belief that they must all work together. They were determined to “mourn together, labor and suffer together, always having before our eyes our commission and community in the work.” The Articles of Agreement plainly laid out the basis for the New England region. These articles made New England a cosmopolitan mix of rich and poor families, all being in possession of land and resolute in doing God’s work (Doc D). However, while the New Englanders settled to create a Holy Utopia, the people of the Chesapeake were concerned not only with their religious freedom, but also ...
In the 1700’s the Puritans left England for the fear of being persecuted. They moved to America for religious freedom. The Puritans lived from God’s laws. They did not depend as much on material things, and they had a simpler and conservative life. More than a hundred years later, the Puritan’s belief toward their church started to fade away. Some Puritans were not able to recognize their religion any longer, they felt that their congregations had grown too self-satisfied. They left their congregations, and their devotion to God gradually faded away. To rekindle the fervor that the early Puritans had, Jonathan Edwards and other Puritan ministers led a religious revival through New England. Edwards preached intense sermons that awakened his congregation to an awareness of their sins. With Edwards’ sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” he persuades the Puritans to convert back to Puritanism, by utilizing rhetorical strategies such as, imagery, loaded diction, and a threatening and fearful tone.
Watt interprets from Winthrop that the “colony is based on the religious principles of the Puritan faith” (Par.4). This connection between the Puritan church and colony is what Winthrop wants for the Puritans, so they can work for the “common good” (Par. 5). The relation between what Winthrop wants, and the way today’s church and society work together, is the most common in his works. Today’s way of charity shows Winthrop’s original thoughts because each want the church body to operate together, even outside of the church home. This idea holds up the question Winthrop asks about why some citizens are rich and some are poor because in a properly working church, one that works for the common good
The Puritans who were seeking religious freedom were the first to affect New England religiously. Therefore, religion was heavily influential in the New England colonies. This area was strictly Calvinist, and there was little to no tolerance for any other religion. This homogeneity allowed for a rigorous sense of local order. The church was an equally-important partner with town governance in preserving social order (Church and State were not separate!) In every colony except for Rhode Island, law required everyone to attend worship services on the Sabbath and every taxpayer to contribute to the support of the
Unlike Winthrop who called for shared cooperation, Penn upheld liberty of conscience and affirmed that no entity has the authority to rule over one’s consciousness. Specifically writing the law, “That, in all courts all persons of all persuasions may freely appear in their own way, and according to their own manners and there personally plead their own cause themselves” (Frame of Government of Pennsylvania). Certainly, he understood the individual’s right to his own thinking, even going as far as entrusting them to advocate for themselves in the court of law. Further, religious liberty also took root in
Due to the fact that Pennsylvania was liberal, it helped it in politics, religion, and with ethnic ties. Pennsylvania had a representative assembly, voted by landowners. The colonists had freedom of worship and a "no tax-supported church". The rich mix of ethnic groups helped the colonists learn more about other cultures and also helped to bring forth new traditions. Therefore, liberation helped gain strength in the political, religious, and ethnic ties in Pennsylvania.
Religion was a key component to the construction of the early American colonial society. It shaped the beliefs and actions of the settlers within the society in many ways. Originally, the newcomers settling on North American land had main motives of owning their own land, increasing their country’s empire and gaining personal profit. Alongside those motives came the sheer desire to spread their religion with whom they encountered in the new land of opportunity. As stated, settlers set out to convert others towards Christianity because they believed freedom was found in worshiping God. Socially, if a person identified as a Christian they automatically were placed higher on the hierarchy. In the same respect, religion and politics at this time were delicately intertwined. Being Christian also meant the government heavily favored you and your peoples since you were to be considered influential in society. In the Maryland Act Concerning Religion (1644), John Winthrop’s Speech to the Massachusetts General Court (1645), the Trial of Anne Hutchinson (1637) and Roger Williams Letter to the Town of Providence (1655) one can notice the striking role religion plays both socially and
Religious freedom in Pennsylvania could best be described by the word tolerance. This word describes the liberal attitudes held by members of other religious groups and an acceptance of an inherent right to hold differing beliefs. Religious diversity in the new colony was not an obstacle to overcome but an essential facet of society. Even with this inclusive attitude toward differing beliefs, many provincial Pennsylvanians continued to indentify and distinguish themselves upon religious lines. This religious categorization continued in the majority throughout the colonial
A short background of how all of this even happened was due to King Charles II of England owing money to William Penn’s father because of a large loan he had with him. He gave it to William Penn because his father had already passed. He granted Penn a quite large piece of land west and south of New Jersey.The date of this offer was made on March 4, 1681. William Penn named the area Sylvania, which was Latin for woods. King Charles II then changed the name of the land to Pennsylvania in honor of William’s father. Penn being a quaker, had many ideas of making that land a place where anyone could come to worship their god freely. Being free to worship how they want, the English, Dutch, Welsh, German, French Protestants, Mennonites, Amish, Lutherans (from Catholic German states), and Dutch Quakers decided to head to that colony. Pennsylvania was confirmed to be William Penn’s land on January 5, 1681 and once that happened he started to sell the land, causing people to emigrate to his land. With Pennsylvania being about forty thousand square miles, he sold parts of the land for forty shillings per one hundred acres and one hundred pounds for five thousand acres.
According to both Winthrop and Rowlandson, if one has true faith in God, he will be able to witness God's mercy in his own life. Winthrop clearly underscores this point in his sermon, where he stresses that the Puritans must uphold their covenant with God in order to have a harmonious and successful colony. If one is faithful and obedient to God, he will be the recipient of God's providence: "Now if the Lord shall please to hear us, and bring us in peace to the place we desire, then hath He ratified this covenant and sealed our commission, [and] will expect a strict pe...
John Winthrop was a pioneer for religious freedom in America. As one of the early settlers sailing west on the Arbella, he composed a sermon called A Model for Christian Charity. Winthrop’s sermon is the framework for creating the spiritual colony that he envisioned and a way to unite the people coming to a new land. The people traveling west were not from one group but rather came from many groups and backgrounds. Winthrop knew that in order to succeed in the wilderness these individuals would have to give up some of their individuality for the greater good of the colony. Winthrop felt that religion was the ultimate way to accomplish this and that Christ was the perfect model to follow. In one passage he says:
In 1630, the Massachusetts Bay Company set sail to the New World in hope of reforming the Church of England. While crossing the Atlantic, John Winthrop, the puritan leader of the great migration, delivered perhaps the most famous sermon aboard the Arbella, entitled “A Model of Christian Charity.” Winthrop’s sermon gave hope to puritan immigrants to reform the Church of England and set an example for future immigrants. The Puritan’s was a goal to get rid of the offensive features that Catholicism left behind when the Protestant Reformation took place. Under Puritanism, there was a constant strain to devote your life to God and your neighbors. Unlike the old England, they wanted to prove that New England was a community of love and individual worship to God. Therefore, they created a covenant with God and would live their lives according to the covenant. Because of the covenant, Puritans tried to abide by God’s law and got rid of anything that opposed their way of life. Between 1630 and the 18th century, the Puritans tried to create a new society in New England by creating a covenant with God and living your life according to God’s rule, but in the end failed to reform the Church of England. By the mid 1630’s, threats to the Puritans such as Roger Williams, Anne Hutchinson, and Thomas Hooker were being banned from the Puritan community for their divergent beliefs. 20 years later, another problem arose with the children of church members and if they were to be granted full membership to the church. Because of these children, a Halfway Covenant was developed to make them “halfway” church members. And even more of a threat to the Puritan society was their notion that they were failing God, because of the belief that witches existed in 1692.
One instance that Winthrop uses brotherly love is: “[t]here is likewise a double lay by which we are regulated in out conversation one towards another in both the former respects: the Law of nature and the law of grace, or the moral law or the law of the Gospel, to omit the rule of justice as not properly belonging to this purpose otherwise than it may fall into consideration in some particular cases” (Winthrop 104). From this, Winthrop is saying that every man of God should treat another man of God the way they want to be treated. Edwards, on the other hand, says, “The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked: his wrath towards you burns like fire; he looks upon you as worthy of nothing else, but to be cast into the fire” (Edwards 285). The comparison of “Pit of fire” and “Pit of hell,” are common themes in Edwards’s sermon. Some would argue that this is unnecessary and will only push people away from God and scare them, but Edwards has a different view on this. At the end of Edwards sermon he says, “[a]nd now you have an extraordinary opportunity, a day wherein Christ has thrown the door of mercy wide open, and stands in calling and crying with a loud voice to poor sinners; a day wherein many are flocking to him, and
On September 25, 2016 a sermon was preached by Rev. Dr. Nathaniel Phillips at Red Clay Creek Presbyterian Church in Wilmington, DE where he serves as a co-pastor. His sermon titled There is a monster at the end of this sermon incorporated descriptive language to engage the listeners and encourage the congregation whom he serves to live out their missional goal to strengthen current community connections and to further new connections.