Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conflict between Israel and Palestine
Conflicts between Israel and Arabs
Conflicts between Israel and Arabs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conflict between Israel and Palestine
Section A:
One of the most complex issues of our times is the Arab–Israeli conflict. In this assessment, I will examine how Britain’s conflicting promises made to the opposing parties contributed to the Arab-Israeli War. I will examine this through an analysis of several primary sources originating from the period prior to the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. These documents of historical meetings and promises such as the Balfour aration, the McMahon letters, and the White Papers of 1939 give us insight on how Britain’s contradictory promises led to conflict.
Section B:
Before the British Mandate:
In late 1800’s, Theodor Herzl founded Zionism . From the Jewish perspective, Palestine was “a land without a people for a people without a land” (“Zionist Phrase”). This led a large numbers of Jews in the early 1900’s to immigrate to Palestine, which they viewed as their God-given land.
WW1 and Outcomes:
The British saw WWI as an opportunity to conquer Palestine from the frail Ottoman Empire. The British enlisted the Arabs to fight against the Ottoman Empire, and in return, in 1915 a British high commissioner wrote to the Arab ruler of Mecca in the McMahon Letters “Great Britain is prepared to recognize and support the independence of the Arabs in all regions” (“McMahon Letters”).
In 1917 British Foreign Minister, Arthur Balfour promised in the Balfour Declaration that: “His Majesty’s government views with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people [sic] nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.” (“Balfour Declaration”).
The British Government restated the terms of the Balfour Declaration in the Churchill White papers of ...
... middle of paper ...
...li war, which ultimately arose from Britain’s opposing promises.
Section E:
Ultimately despite their best intentions, the British had set themselves up for an inevitable failure by making opposing arrangements that could not be satisfied simultaneously. Hence, the British were doomed by their own ambivalence. The British promises based off a strategy of short-term military and political gains only led to disappointment on both sides, increasing tensions between the opposing parties. However, we must remember that the United States, Zionist terrorist groups, economic issues, and the United Nations all contributed to preventing Britain from fulfilling its promises and mending the conflict. These factors however only accelerated and confirmed the inevitable outcome of an Arab-Israeli war, which was spurred on due to tension created by Britain’s contradictory promises.
As soon as Jewish immigration increased, so did the tension between the two groups because each felt like they deserved the Palestine land. Zionism began early in the history of Judiasm and it was the movement for the Jews to establish a home in Palestine, and return to their holy land. During the Holocaust, six million Jews were killed and the deep-seeded hatre against them increased
The Middle East has historically rebuked Western influence during their process of establishing independence. When Britain and France left the Middle East after World War II, the region saw an unprecedented opportunity to establish independent and self-sufficient states free from the Western influence they had felt for hundreds of years. In an attempt to promote nationalistic independence, the states of the region immediately formed the League of Arab States in 1945. The League recognized and promoted the autonomy of its members and collaborated in regional opposition against the West until 1948 when Israel declared independence. Israel represented then and now an intrusive Western presence in the Arab world. The ongoing Arab-Israeli conflict typifies this cultural antagonism. The Cold War refocused attention to the Middle East as a site of economic and strategic importance for both sides, yet the two hegemons of the Cold War now needed to recognize the sovereignty of the Middle Eastern states. With their statehood and power cemented, the Middle Easte...
Late into the 19th century, Zionism (a biblical name for Jerusalem) started to rise when Theodor Herzl published an article that concluded Jewish assimilation and emancipation could not work in Europe. It was this that started plans for the creation of a Jewish statehood. During this time, the population of Jews were spread out across different countries, and in each of these countries, they had represented a minority. Throughout this period, they had longed for a state in which they called Eretz Israel, the land of Israel. Herzl’s proposed solution was for the revival of a Jewish homeland where they could set up a state belonging to themselves. Following his publishings, the First Zionist Congress was held in Switzerland. The program state that “The aim of Zionism is to create for the Jewish people a homeland in Palestine secure by public law”. Much of the Jewish community at this point held mixed views about this movement but it was this time period of the late 19th ce...
“Many Jews were fleeing Europe from Hitler so that they can reclaim the land they believed was their Biblical birthright, (Document 4 Excepts from the Israeli Declaration of Independence). Leaders were petitioning Great Britain to allow Jewish people to begin migrating into Palestine, then in 194 8the formal state of Israel was formed. “The Balfour Declaration Britain promised a national home for the Jewish people as seen in” (document 2). However, people were already living there so the natives felt like they were getting there home taken away from
In the novel War and Peace In the Middle East, author Avi Shlaim argues that Arab nations have been unable to escape the post-Ottoman syndrome. In particular he describes how the various powers inside and outside the region have failed to produce peace. While some of Shlaim's arguments hinder the message, I agree with his overall thesis that the Middle East problems were caused and prolonged by the failure of both powers and superpowers to take into account the regional interests of the local states.
The ideas of David, Reuven and other reform Jews sparked new interest in the notion of a Hebrew state in Palestine. Zionism was an idea with a long history, but it starts to involve the characters of The Chosen and picks up intensity after the Holocaust.
Zionism is a group of individuals that believe they deserve a Jewish homeland, a place of sanctuary where they would live freely.
...of the situation, "The position of the Jews in liberated countries is desperate. The political pressure in Palestine is becoming unbearable. And so is my personal position as President of the Jewish agency. This is the hour to eliminate the British White Paper, to open the doors of Palestine and to proclaim the Jewish state" (Ganin). The British negative attitude gave the militant Zionists who wanted a new policy towards England and for new activist leadership a reason to take action. They felt, "...it's astonishing how fast they forgot about that..." (Silverberg). The Zionist leaders saw that after World War Two, Britain was exhausted economically and psychologically. British power had weakened because of the war. The Jewish community realized that they would not be able to rely on Britain for help and so they turned all their attention to the United States (Ganin).
The Middle East has since time immemorial been on the global scope because of its explosive disposition. The Arab Israeli conflict has not been an exception as it has stood out to be one of the major endless conflicts not only in the region but also in the world. Its impact continues to be felt all over the world while a satisfying solution still remains intangible. A lot has also been said and written on the conflict, both factual and fallacious with some allegations being obviously evocative. All these allegations offer an array of disparate views on the conflict. This essay presents an overview of some of the major literature on the controversial conflict by offering precise and clear insights into the cause, nature, evolution and future of the Israel Arab conflict.
Theodor Herzl was born in Budapest. He received a law degree later in life, but chose to go on the path of writing. He was 31 years old in 1891, he moved to Paris as a writer for the Vienna Neue Freie Presse. Coming across anti-Semitism, he assumed that the solution was for Jews to totally integrate. He believed that anti-Semitism happened because Jews looked and acted differently. Herzl was covering the Dreyfus trial as a writer when he witnessed the cruel anti-Semitism of the French. When he witnessed the embarrassment of Alfred Dreyfus and heard the mobs screaming about how much they hated the Jews, he was stunned. Dreyfus was a totally integrated Jew, high-ranking in the French army, a man of culture and French idealism. The French were one of the most cultured people in the world. Their anti-Semitic responses couldn't come from unfamiliarity. Herzl decided that the only solution for anti-Semitism was migration of Jews to their own land. Anti-Semitism would stop, he believed, only when Jews had their own country. Herzl founded the Zionist movement. Although he was not the first ...
In 1991 in the Persian Gulf Israel was continuously bombed by Iraq. If Israel would have fought back chances are there would have had most of the Arabian countries join in with Iraq to eliminate the common enemy. Therefore the problems are yet not resolved yet it seems there is never a perfect solution to any problem. Bibliography 1. Holocaust : the Jewish tragedy Gilbert,Martin, COLLI 1986 2.
Herzel and other zionist were actively seeking jewish states in Uganda and other places around the world but ended up choosing Palestine for it’s biblical history. He also claims that there was and always had been a major jewish presence in and around Palestine. This “fact” is also incredibly debateable and dershowitz said himself, census data and documents from before the era were poor and sometimes forged. The modern Muslims, had control of the ldn for close to 1200 years. Although you can claim that Jews were there first, there were many tribes living in Palestine when abraham arrived and after the 400 year enslavement in Egypt. If we have a right to the land before we lived there before, don't the Muslims who previously lived their and their tribal ancestors also have some claim to the land. Arguments like “the arabs tended to leave and not return, while the Jews were more stable.” (pg. 26) are one sided and biased because jews did leave and there were large periods of time were there was a complete absence of Jews completely. Dershowitz, on a number of occasions, attempted to draw a parallel between the Pilgrims and the Jews, both groups that faced religious persecution. He fails to mention that the pilgrims brutally slaughtered the indigenous people
Bob Hawke once said; “Unless and until something concrete is done about addressing the Israeli-Palestinian issue you won't get a real start on the war against terrorism.” Perhaps Hawke put into a few simple words one of the most complicated issues within our world today, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. As Israel continues to strip the Palestinians of their land and fears it’s very existence because of the Palestinians terrorist acts, there seems to be no solution in sight. The world appears to be split and all over the place when it comes to this matter. According to The Middle East Institute for Understanding approximately 129 countries recognize Palestine as a state while many others do not. Over all the political matters within this issue not only affect Palestine and Israel but the world as a whole, as the Middle East and the West seem to disagree. This has had and will continue to have an enormous impact on many political affairs all over the world particularly in the current fight against terrorism. Personally I feel that the Israeli Palestinian conflict while being a very complicated matter has a simple solution. Within this issue I am a firm believer that the occupation of the West Bank by Israeli forces is extremely unjust and must come to an end. Once this is achieved a two state solution will be the most effective way to bring peace to the area. The occupation of the West Bank violates political and legal rights, human rights, and illegally forces Palestinians who have lived in the area for hundreds of years from their land. This conflict is at the height of its importance and a solution is of dire need as nuclear issues arise in the Middle East due to the tension between Israel and it’s surrounding neighbors, and the...
...on by revolting against British authority and Jewish immigrants. The subsequent White Papers of 1937 and 1939 that the British released were to pacify both sides but sufficiently proved to both the Arabs and the Zionists that the British were unwilling to support just one side and their policies, including the Balfour Declaration, proved to be conflicting ideas. Furthermore the British could not balance the two opposing national movements forever as both were growing with the increase of Jewish immigration and land sales. Eventually the Arabs and Zionists rebelled against the British who in never supporting one side wholeheartedly lost its hold over the entire of Palestine. In the years to come many British leaders “soon reached the conclusion that the Balfour Declaration had been a colossal blunder, unfair to the Arabs and detrimental to the empire’s interests”
For many centuries, Judaic and Arabian societies have engaged in one of the most complicated and lengthy conflicts known to mankind, the makings of a highly difficult peace process. Unfortunately for all the world’s peacemakers the Arab-Israeli conflict, particularly the war between Israel and the Palestinian Territories, is rooted in far more then ethnic tensions. Instead of drawing attention towards high-ranking officials of the Israeli government and Hamas, focus needs to be diverted towards the more suspect and subtle international relations theory of realism which, has imposed more problems than solutions.