Aquinas Contingency Argument

149 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Aquinas second argument

The conclusion of Aquinas’s argument is that there must exist a necessary being that is the reason for the existence of contingent beings. Aquinas argues for this conclusion by saying that all contingent beings can be traced back to other contingent beings. He says that because the progenitors are also contingent, they do not give a complete explanation. The existence of contingent beings can only be properly explained by tracing them back to a necessary being.
The aspect of Aquinas’s argument Edwards criticizes is that the contingency argument rests on what makes a phenomena intelligible. The real factors that explain the existence of a phenomena are adequate whether or not the factors themselves are contingent or not. The true factors of

Show More
Related

  • Aquinas versus Anselm

    908 Words  | 2 Pages

    Examining the two works against each other as if it were a debate makes it a bit clearer to compare. Aquinas, reveals his argument under the groundwork that there are essentially two methods of understanding the truth. One being that it can be surmised through reason an logic, and the other being via inner faith. On the surface at this point it could be argued that this ontological determination a bit less convoluted than Anselm, yet I tend to think it could be a bit more confusing. This is what leads him to the claim that the existence of God can be proven by reason alone or “a priori”. Stemming from this belief he formulated his Five Proofs or what he called the “Quinquae Viae”. The first of which is fairly simple based on the fact that something in motion had to have been moved. Agreeing that something set it in motion therefor there must have been a...

    Read More

  • Anselm's Ontological Argument Essay

    794 Words  | 2 Pages

    St. Anselm and St. Thomas Aquinas were considered as some of the best in their period to represent philosophy. St. Anselm’s argument is known as the ontological argument; it revolves entirely around his statement, “God is that, than which no greater can be conceived” (The Great Conversation, Norman Melchert 260). St. Thomas Aquinas’ argument is known as the cosmological argument; it connects the effects of events to the cause for why they happened. Anselm’s ontological proof and Aquinas’ cosmological proof both argued for God’s existence, differed in the way they argued God’s existence, and had varying degrees of success using these proofs.

    Read More

  • The Cosmological Argument and the Mystical Argument

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the first part, Aquinas states that the existence of god is not self-evident, meaning that reason alone without appealing to faith can give a good set of reasons to believe. To support this claim, Aquinas refers to “The Argument of Motion”, proposing that:

    Read More

  • Natural Law Theory and The Doctrine of Double Effect Theory: Thomas Aquinas

    590 Words  | 2 Pages

    The difference between absolutism and objectivism is that where objectivists believe that there are universal moral principles in which people of all ethical backgrounds and cultures have the validity to follow, absolutists believe that there are underlying values within these beliefs that strictly cannot ever be over-ridden, violated or broken under any circumstances (REF). Furthermore, while absolutists believe in this notion that moral principles are ‘exception-less’, objectivists strongly follow the notion that life is situational and that we as humans have to adapt accordingly to the variables that arise, take them into account, and then make a decision accordingly (REF). Within this introduction of variables applicable to any situation, it is therefore believed that each moral principle must be weighed against each other to produce the best possible outcome, and this is where the overriding of values occurs in an objectivists view, and where an absolutist would disregard these circumstances.

    Read More

  • Aquinas' Third Way

    471 Words  | 1 Pages

    Aquinas’ argument has a couple of flaws in it. One is pointed out by Samuel Clarke, who says a whole series of dependant...

    Read More

  • St. Thomas Aquinas’ First Two Ways in Proving the Existence of God

    5036 Words  | 11 Pages

    existence to those who could not accept or believe God on faith alone. Aquinas’ first way

    Read More

  • Aquinas’ Cosmological Arguments

    1633 Words  | 4 Pages

    Aquinas’ Cosmological Arguments The Cosmological Argument for the existence of God, as propounded by Thomas Aquinas, also known as the Third Way. It is the third of Five Ways in Aquinas's masterpiece, "The Summa" (The Five Ways). The five ways are: the unmoved mover, the uncaused causer, possibility and. necessity, goodness, truth and nobility and the last way the teleological.

    Read More

  • Aquinas' Arguments for the Existence of God

    1275 Words  | 3 Pages

    He continues by saying that for any change to occur there must have been a previous cause that existed in reality and if one was to trace this line of causes and effects all the way back there must be a first cause that began the chain. But there cannot be anything worldly like that because anything natural must have an impetus already in reality to transform it from potentiality to reality. The only explanation, in Aquinas' e... ... middle of paper ... ... s a cause except God.

    Read More

  • Descartes Proof Of God

    1660 Words  | 4 Pages

    While I do agree with some of Aquinas’ claims. Such as the idea that nothing comes from nothing. I believe something has to happen to become. It could be the efficient cause, causing the world to start. Although still having the question what made such a cause to effect everything in the

    Read More

  • St. Thomas Aquinas’ On Being and Essence

    996 Words  | 2 Pages

    In St. Thomas Aquinas’ On Being and Essence, he devotes an entire chapter of his book discussing how essence is found in composite substances. “Form and matter are found in composite substances, as for example soul and body in man. But it cannot be said that either one of these alone is called the essence.’ Aquinas argues that in a composite substance, not only is the form but also matter in the essence of a thing. However, in Metaphysics, Aristotle says that essence is in the form, which acts upon matter. He writes, “The form or the thing as having form should be said to be thing, but matter by itself must never be said to be so.” Yet, Aristotle’s thesis poses a philosophical problem. If one supposes that Aristotle is correct, then how can one think of something without it necessitating its physical existence? This essay will first be an exposition of the passage found in Aquinas’ On Being and Essence. The second part of this essay will be an analysis of Aquinas’ thesis in relation to Aristotle’s. It will also address Aquinas’ solution to necessitating existence.

    Read More

  • Faith Or Reason?

    1142 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thomas Aquinas was a teacher of the Dominican Order and he taught that most matters of The Divine can be proved by natural human reason, while “Others were strictly ‘of faith’ in that they could be grasped only through divine revelation.” This was a new view on the faith and reason argument contradictory to both Abelard with his belief that faith should be based on human reason, and the Bernard of Clairvaux who argued that one should only need faith.

    Read More

  • Thomas Aquinas's Five Arguments For The Existence Of God

    637 Words  | 2 Pages

    This is because it’s possible for everything both to exist and not to exist, therefore both possibilities must have been fulfilled at some point. He phrases it in those terms, but I believe his argument is better understood by saying everything which exists must have come into existence, and therefore didn’t exist before that. Since something cannot spontaneously come into existence, he believes, another being gave everything else existence. This is called a “necessary thing,” meaning its existence is necessary for the existence of other things. Aquinas believes a being bestowed its necessity onto itself and did “not [receive] it from another.” What was a paradox before, an object being both the cause and effect, is now the logic. This object is God, and gave existence to all other

    Read More

  • Thomas Aquinas Natural Law Summary

    1713 Words  | 4 Pages

    In question 94 of his On Law, Morality, and Politics, Thomas Aquinas initiates his interpretation of natural law. He defines law as, “an ordinance of reason for the common good by one competent to make it, and promulgated” (10). Here, he suggests law is derived from an act of reason which commands or prohibits. Thus, it compels behavior. It must be rational and ordered to the common good of a community. Throughout On Law, Morality, and Politics, Aquinas analyzes four kinds of law: human, divine, eternal, and natural. Although human law is integral for the order of society, humans require more in order to live virtuous lives. Therefore, natural law is important due to its focus on human beings and their societies, as well as for its interconnected

    Read More

  • Aquinas Double Effect

    1155 Words  | 3 Pages

    The principle of double effect still remains a doubtful and topical in modern Philosophy and Theology. The principle arouses a special interest of scholars and academics focused on the questions of ethics. For the first time the principle of double effect was introduced by Thomas Aquinas in his debate of the admissibility of self-defence (McIntyre,2014). The potential lack of understanding of term may be caused by difficulties and ambiguities int traditional formulations (Boyle,1980). To begin with, it is important to define the principle, give its main idea and characteristics.

    Read More

  • Before and After Christianity

    745 Words  | 2 Pages

    Aquinas goes on to answer that challenge that, if philosophy based on Christianity is a science, it is a lesser science because it is less certain of its conclusions, having accepted them on faith. Aquinas responds to this argument in two parts. First, he argues that God’s revelation is more certain then what seems self-evident to humans because God, unlike humans, is omniscient. The only reason it seems less certain is because fully comprehending God’s level of certainty is beyond human abilities.

    Read More

More about Aquinas Contingency Argument

Open Document