Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of lenin on russia
Impact of lenin on russia
Collapse of tsarist regime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of lenin on russia
The April Theses were a series of directives issued by the Bolshevik leader Vladimir Lenin upon his return to Petrograd, Russia from his exile in Switzerland. The Theses’ were mainly written toward Bolsheviks in Russia and returning to Russia from exile. Lenin denounced liberals and social democrats in the Provisional Government, he also told Bolsheviks to not cooperate with the government. He called for new communists policies and told the soviets to take power. In the next few months, the April Theses influenced the July Days and October Revolution and were identified as Leninism.
The Theses was issued on the 4th of April in 1917, after the collapse of Imperial Russia. Just over a month after the February Revolution which ended with the abdication (when a monarch gives up their power) of Tsar Nicholas II, and the establishment of the liberal Provisional Government under Georgy Lvov and later Alexander Kerensky. Liberals and moderate socialists who wanted to instigate political reform dominated the Provisional Government and created a democracy with elections for an executive and a constituent assembly.
Lenin wanted to return to Russia asap but it would cause problems because he was kept in Switzerland as World War I continued in close states. Fritz Platten, a Swiss communist, set a plan up with the German government to get a safe way for Lenin and his company to get through Germany by the so-called "sealed train." The German government obviously hoped the return of Lenin would create jumble of political things in Russia, which would lead to the surrendering of Russia and the end of Russian participation of the war on the informal alliance side, ending the war on the Eastern Front and letting German forces to focus on their...
... middle of paper ...
...eturn to Russia was a baffling period for Russian Socialists, who before had held Lenin in high admiration and had believed he would bring them together after his return. Even though his extensive positions caused more separation than ever among Russia’s many political groups. Lenin’s denial to agree backfired on him, however, in the autumn he would need the support of these groups to assure power.
Eventually, Lenin did go back short-term on his earlier big positions, with the goal of gaining more support. In particular, he temporarily accepted the Petrograd Soviet. Although this effort did have some limited triumph, it didn't reach the level of support that he had hoped for. So, he decided to focus on slandering the provisional government and also building up connections within the military so after the revolution, he could deal with all the attackers by force.
During the 19th century, Russia was experiencing a series of changes with its entire nation and society overall. The government was trying to adapt themselves to them at the same time. It was not an easy time period for Russia whatsoever. Vladimir Lenin helped change this.
Lenin believed strongly in these morals and used them as a guide to his goal of revolution. The.. The party continued to protest against the current government in Russia and over time the political, social and economic discontent and the famous event known as 'Bloody Sunday', where the imperial guards shot and killed the protesting people of St.Petersburg, eventually. pulled more followers over to the party. After these events, which were known as the 1905 revolution, October Manifesto -.
In order to establish whether Lenin did, indeed lay the foundation for Stalinism, two questions need to be answered; what were Lenin’s plans for the future of Russia and what exactly gave rise to Stalinism? Official Soviet historians of the time at which Stalin was in power would have argued that each one answers the other. Similarly, Western historians saw Lenin as an important figure in the establishment of Stalin’s socialist state. This can be partly attributed to the prevailing current of pro-Stalin anti-Hitler sentiments amongst westerners until the outbreak of the cold war.
Themistocles contribution to the defence of Greece was more significant than any other Greek individual. To what extent do you agree?
Trotsky played a key role in the Bolshevik party, encouraging revolution, which saw the Bolsheviks gain power in 1917. He built up a strong Red Army during the civil war, used to ensure the survival of the Bolshevik government and was seen by many as the most likely candidate to take over as leader after Lenin’s death, showing the significance he was held in by Russians. However, evidence suggests that after Lenin’s death he lost his a considerable amount of power, eventually being exiled from the Communist party. In the short-term it is clear that Trotsky had a huge significance in the development of Russia, shown clearly through both his letters and documents, and the opinions of those close to Trotsky. The significance is obvious through his role in the build up to the October Revolution, his negotiations with Germany through the Brest-Litovsk Treaty, his contribution to Bolshevik success in the civil war and his attitude towards terror and his failure to out maneuver Stalin to succeed Lenin.
Lenin made a series of policies throughout the beginning of the Revolution and through his short time in public office that came to be collectively known as ‘Leninism’. There were many things that influenced Leninism, such as Karl Marx. Lenin had read Karl Marx and his...
In 1905 , Russia had a prerevolution that was put down of the Czar. Instead of learning from this prerevolution, Czar Nicholas II, made a very big mistake by in not introducing some reforms to correct the problems. So because of his actions, the situation grew worse. In 1917, the Russians were fighting in World War I. A good majority of the Russian people were weary and uncontent with the way the war was going and with the Czar's rule. This uncontent along with economic hardships caused riots and demonstrations to break out. The Czar called for the army to put down the revolution as they did in 1905. But the army joined the revolt and the Czar was kicked out of power soon afterwards. A temporary government was set up to decide on what kind of government Russia was gonna set up. Two political parties were set up. The Bolsheviks were one of the two. The leader of the Bolshevik party was a man named Lenin. Lenin was a firm believer of the theories and ideas of Karl Marx. So with his slogan of "Bread, Peace and Land", Lenin gained the support of the peasants and gained control of Russia and setup a communist state.
The Bolsheviks a more intense revolutionary group took over. This party was lead by Vladi-mir Lenin who believed in the ideas of Karl Marx and Marxism (Stock). Lenin’s First step was to sign a peace treaty with Germany to pull Russian troops out of the war. The Bolshevik govern-ment was a dictatorship. Lenin had revolutionary antecedents His older brother, Alexander was plotting to murder Tsar Alexander and was executed leaving Lenin with hate toward the royal (Lerner). Lenin created the very first Communist state and declared Russia a Soviet republic. There were more people getting involved in this revolution, inspired by the Bolsheviks and Len-in’s over all ideas for Russia. His slogan Peace, la...
Trotsky impact on his time after the revolution began when he was instated as Commissar of Foreign affairs in the Bolshevik party. It was his duty to implement the peace decree, essential for the Bolshevik’s to consolidate their power. However, Trotsky had adopted the policy, ‘no peace no war’, in relation to the peace negotiations with Germany. This led to more punitive conditions after his initial refusal to sign the decree. This had a significant impact for Russia at the time as it saw the loss of large amounts of territory including Latvia, Estonia and the Ukraine. The Bolsheviks faced resistance to the conditions of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk due to Trotsky’s actions, which had a meaningful, although negative, impact on the times as it led to the outbreak of the Civil war. However, Trotsky continued to have a meaningful impact on his time during the civil war as he was appointed. This had an impact as he transformed the Red Militia into an effective army re-appointing Tsarist officers to provide training and organisation, re-introducing conscription, salutes and ranks within the army. Trotsky had transformed the militia of 300 000 in 1918 into an effective army of 5 million in 1920. This army was used to swiftly combat the revolt at Kronstadt naval base, ending the civil war. This suggests Trotsky’s leadership allowed for Bolshevik victory which eliminated internal oppositions allowing the consolidation of Bolshevik power. This had a very meaningful impact on the time as it allowed for the continuation of the first socialist state in the world. Therefore, Trotsky’s contribution as commissar of foreign affairs, and commissar of war to a large extent made a meaningful impact on his
In “The Fish” by Elizabeth Bishop, the narrator attempts to understand the relationship between humans and nature and finds herself concluding that they are intertwined due to humans’ underlying need to take away from nature, whether through the act of poetic imagination or through the exploitation and contamination of nature. Bishop’s view of nature changes from one where it is an unknown, mysterious, and fearful presence that is antagonistic, to one that characterizes nature as being resilient when faced against harm and often victimized by people. Mary Oliver’s poem also titled “The Fish” offers a response to Bishop’s idea that people are harming nature, by providing another reason as to why people are harming nature, which is due to how people are unable to view nature as something that exists and goes beyond the purpose of serving human needs and offers a different interpretation of the relationship between man and nature. Oliver believes that nature serves as subsidence for humans, both physically and spiritually. Unlike Bishop who finds peace through understanding her role in nature’s plight and acceptance at the merging between the natural and human worlds, Oliver finds that through the literal act of consuming nature can she obtain a form of empowerment that allows her to become one with nature.
This essay asks for the comparison of the three historical monographs, which offer different interpretations of the same or related topic. This essay will focus on writings about the Russian Revolution (1818-1919) particularly concentrating on the October Revolution in 1917 and the leadership of Vladimir Lenin during this period. The goal of this essay is to examine how three historians, from three separate schools of thought, have interpreted these events and how their particular political views, evidence and personal experiences have influenced these interpretations. This will be achieved by analysing the works of Richard Pipes; a western liberal-conservative, Dmitri Volkogonov; a soviet-revisionist and John Reed; a socialist.
...ove Russian people's lives by giving them the vision through his “April Thesis” stating his ideas on taking over the intermediate government. He provided the leadership that was necessary during the revolution he knew that democratic centralism was necessary, which would be leading the revolution for the people. In 1917 the followers of Lenin called the Bolsheviks took control of the government ending the war with Germany. Later in 1920 after the civil war broke out between the White army and the Red Army, The Red army wins and Lenin seizes the opportunity and implemented his New Economic Policy. Lenin believing that a socialist revolution would be successful if there were multiple revolutions happening together all at once in Europe. Later after Karl Marx died his work was brought back by a man named Joseph Stalin. Stalin incorporated both Lenin and Marx's ideals by
Over the next few years, Russia went through a traumatic time of civil war and turmoil. The Bolsheviks’ Red Army fought the white army of farmers, etc. against Lenin and his ways. Lenin and the Bolsheviks won and began to wean Russia of non-conforming parties eventually banning all non-communist as well as removing an assembly elected shortly after the Bolshevik’s gain of power. Lenin’s strict government, however, was about to get a lot stricter with his death in 1924.
Lenin's Economic Policies in 1924 When the Bolsheviks seized power in October 1917 they inherited many of the problems faced by the old Tsarist regime as well as those of the Provisional Government after the Tsars abdication. Lenin, as leader of the Bolsheviks took many measures to try and solve these problems, each with varying degrees of success. This essay will, therefore, go on to look at and discuss the various measures that Lenin and the Bolshevik party took, and, whether these measures created more problems for Russia in the end or in fact made significant progress towards the communist society that Lenin had prophesised for Russia. In the early days of Bolshevik rule, there were many problems facing Lenin.