Appiah's Argument Summary

1933 Words4 Pages

Introduction and Overview of Appiah’s Argument Kwame Anthony Appiah is a well-known philosopher and cultural theorist who promotes a viewpoint that goes beyond specific cultural boundaries. His work underscores the unity of humanity and the value of recognizing our shared humanity despite individual differences. Appiah's examination of impartiality is especially relevant in the realm of family ethics, where traditional ethical frameworks often struggle to address the complexities of relationships and identities. By questioning the idea of impartiality, Appiah encourages us to rethink how we make decisions within the context of family ties and responsibilities. Appiah's criticism of impartiality arises from the understanding that humans are inherently part of social networks and communities, including their families. In his discussion he points out the limitations of striving for impartiality in discussions, arguing that such an approach fails to consider the intricate dynamics present in family connections. By separating choices from …show more content…

Moreover, there may be doubts about how practical his framework is in dealing with ethical issues within families, especially when conflicting moral duties come into play. Other perspectives may advocate for a rule-based approach to family ethics, where ethical principles are applied universally regardless of personal factors. Alternatively, some might emphasize looking at the consequences of actions rather than the intentions or relationships involved. While Appiah's global perspective provides insights into family ethics, it does come with its set of limitations and obstacles. Through engaging in discussions and considering viewpoints, we can enhance our understanding of ethical theories and practices, within familial

Open Document