To Space
The missions of both Apollo and the future missions to Mars are the results of the work done by program planners. In program planning may be more favored over the original. Most successful of the missions were directed with the advice NASA receives and it is due to technology and the input of engineers. With a desire to further the quality of scientific returns, planetary scientists would have a major role in the decision-making process of future missions. Although both the Apollo and Mars missions are entirely different planet, they both have some similarities and differences.
There are a few similarities and differences in the missions of the Apollo and the future trips to Mars. The mission of both goals is to find a way to make astronaut exploration possible, meaning, the desired missions were to test the theory that man can be sent to the Moon or Mars and back while surviving the entire mission. The Human- Robotic Partnership is another program that relates to both moon and Mars, which is a safer method of exploration. One of the most important reason is that they both searching the evidence of water on the planet. Water is the pieces of searching for habitable planets and life beyond Earth.
Man set foot on the Moon, during Apollo 11 mission in 1969. The Moon is being closer to the earth then Mars made this possible. After
…show more content…
With Mars being so far, it would make delivering such necessities as food or medicine extremely difficult. Planetary exploration of Mars has been one of NASA's goals ever since the U.S civilian space program was started, which was in 1958. Mariner 9 was the first spacecraft to orbit another planet in 1971; after time NASA had recorded obscured Mars features. This mission gave NASA a better understanding when it comes to what it would take if a man were to travel to
The first major difference between the book Lost Moon and the movie Apollo 13 is that there are several scenes in the movie that aren’t in the book. Many of the scenes involving Jim Lovell’s family are not in the book or are different from those in the book. This is done in order to appeal to a larger audience, not just people who are interesting in science or history. A good example of this is the scene in the movie on Hallo...
The first question is, why should we go to Mars? What are the advantages of traveling to Mars in the first place? One reason could be that it would help increase life across our universe, (Mars One 2017), Or to have another planet to live on if the Earth dies. Increasing life across our universe would help us spread out our population and prosper as the human race.
We as humans knew of the existence of water before we ever began to study it, but a few scientists can be credited with the discovery of its composition. Antoine Laviosier discovered, through electrical experiments, that Hydrogen and Oxygen could be made from water. He made this discovery during the time of the 1770s. The credit of its composition can be given to James Watt in 1783 or Henry Cavendish in 1781. Henry “experimented with hydrogen and oxygen and mixed these elements together to create an explosion (oxyhydrogen effect).” James suggested the composition, while Henry recombined the element of Hydrogen and Oxygen but didn’t publish it until years later after Watt. In the year the years after there came an amazing discovery done by a man named Jöns Jakob Berzelius, and one known as Amadeo Avogadro. Avogadro and Berzelius fixed the atomic weights of these two elements ...
... are also starting to consider colonizing the Martian planet for scientific purposes. The Opportunity rover paved the way for Curiosity’s mission to discover life with its findings of mineral veins produced by water underground and surface rocks altered by moving water on the surface. Following these discoveries Curiosity exposed the presence of water in the Martian soil and the existence of habitat suitable for the survival of microbial life for millions of years. With more and more discoveries happening in such a short period of time one can only speculate when we will find the first hard evidence of life on Mars, which appears to be coming in the near future. In conclusion, all of these discoveries by NASA and the Mars rovers have paved the way for future Martian research and people dreaming of one day colonizing Mars, and mankind can only hope for more to come.
Many important themes can be drawn from reading Roving Mars that share important lessons about the scientific process. This personal account by the author, Steven Squyres, shares his story of passion toward being able to play a hand in the exploration of mars. The account shares many valuable lessons that we can learn for the scientific process and trend that appear in most scientific discovery. The greatest theme that can be gathered from Squyres story is that Science is never easy and it may come with many failures but the most important thing to do is persevere through these challenges. Another important thing to gather from the book is that not all discovery involves proving everything right or testing everything then and there to see if
The idea of space exploration and/or colonizing in outer space is fascinating to many people. In fact, it has intrigued societies for decades. The book, “The Martian” by Andy Weir, is a fictional story that presents the possibility of manned space exploration to Mars. Although, no country has sent a manned spacecraft to Mars, Weir does an excellent job making this task seem like a reality. He seemed to portray space travel accurately. The story presents problems, mathematical, scientific, and sociological, in such a way that draws the reader into the dilemmas of the characters without the reader doubting the accuracy or probability of the situation (Weir 18-20). The manner in which the author does this indicates that he either has a scientific
As it turned out, we learned a lot from those missions, there was much more to it than just getting a man on the moon. We learned that the moon and the earth were very similar when it came to composition but there are enough differences that its formation can't have come from earth alone, the commonly accepted theory is called the gigantic impact theory, which explains the moon's formation by asserting that a celestial body, nearly half the size of the earth, hit the planet and cause the moon to break off and begin its orbit around the earth around 50 million years after the formation of the earth.
It was technology at the finest and left room for improvement as errors were corrected. The Apollo missions taught us much about the unknown and answered, curious questions we had. We benefited much for history and
There were multiple launches to the moon, all providing pieces to the puzzle about our closest neighbor, the moon. Each mission brought back home evidence after evidence of hydrogen, magnesium, etc. This mission was inspired by the common question scientists and space enthusiasts about whether or not the moon is habitable or if there is any possibility of life. The moon is the closest space object that we can reach, and it’s our nearest neighbor that we know nothing about. It turns out that the study concluded that there is a very small amount of water up there.
At the beginning of the 1960’s, the United States was troubled because the Soviet Union had managed to send the Earth’s first artificial satellite into space. This action single-handedly set the United States up to pursue one of its most ambitious missions in history. Following Kennedy’s speech, assigning the United States the goal of sending a man to the moon before the decade was out, the United States set to work on outlining the mission. Miraculously, by 1969, Neil Armstrong was the first to step foot on the moon – followed by Buzz Aldrin. Their time spent on the moon was dedicated mostly to taking samples and setting up tools for scientific research.
Each of NASA’s space exploration projects had many specific goals. The Mercury Project, for example, was designed by scientist to determine human endurance and survival in outer space climate. The
Carl Sagan once said “every planetary civilization will be endangered by impacts from space, every surviving civilization is obliged to become spacefaring—not because of exploratory or romantic zeal, but for the most practical reason imaginable: staying alive. If our long-term survival is at stake, we have a basic responsibility to our species to venture to other worlds.” The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, or NASA, is executing Sagan’s words every day. President Dwight D. Eisenhower created NASA in 1958 with the purpose of peaceful rather than military space exploration and research to contribute to society. Just 11 years after the creation, NASA put Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on the moon, the first humans to accomplish this feat.
Recently, two probes were sent back and they made it to Mars. They landed on the South Polar Caps of Mars. That is where NASA plans to find water. After landing on Mars, the probes extracted water like crystals from the surface of Mars. They found that there was a small amount of water in the crystals, which means that there is a strong chance that life, was on Mars at one time.
As such, this essay will argue that space exploration is a necessity of our kind and that NASA should be progressively more financed. To begin with, space research has helped bring several developments to modern science, affecting the quality of our everyday lives. With issues like climate change, and population overgrowth, our species faces the risks of major extinction (4). Climate change has been a man-made problem in recent years that threatens our planet. It will take huge mitigations from current and future societies to even come close to reversing climate change.
The recent events regarding the NASA Mars probes have renewed the debate of reinstalling manned space missions with the objectives of exploring and landing on foreign worlds such as the moon and the red planet Mars, rather than the use of solely robotic craft and machines. It is my belief that we should return to the days of Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin, those of manned lunar landings and manned space exploration. Robots simply cannot and should not be allowed to be the sole means of visiting these worlds, nor should humans only be able to witness new findings second hand through the use of computers and machines. It is human nature to be normally curious of one’s surroundings, and it is important that we send one of our own to new worlds. The effects that past missions have had on the world’s people, as well as our political and cultural climates are another valid reason for flesh instead of metal to lay claim to space. Also, the limitless applications and new education that manned flights can bring to us from on site human interactions could lead to another technological and industrial revolution like the original lunar programs had done for us during the Gemini and Apollo programs.