Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison of us and uk constitution
U.S bill of rights
Descirbe the Bill of Rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Although most call the war the American ‘Revolution’, America’s founding documents, including the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, are similar to important British archives, such as the English Bill of Rights and the Spirit of the Laws, as evidenced by the existence of the same three branches of power and rights. In the Constitution, written for and by the people in 1789, the people describe America’s three branches of power—legislative, executive, and judicial—and who should hold it in each. According to the Constitution, the “legislative” power should be “vested in congress,” the “executive” branch should be “vested in a President,” and the “judicial” power should be “vested in one supreme court” (Document C). As a result of the American …show more content…
document’s information, one of the English documents named must include the same details. In the Spirit of the Laws, written by Montesquieu during his lifetime, he describes how, again, government control should be distributed.
According to the document, “There are three sorts of power; the legislative, the executive… and the [judicial].” It continues, “There would be an end of every thing were the same man” be able to “exercise those powers” (Document B). This illustrates the similarities between documents, as they include like details. In addition, more American and English archives resemble each other, not just these. On December 15, 1791, Congress ratified the Bill of Rights, in which the first two amendments show the right of the people to express their opinion and the freedom of the people to arm themselves. The Bill of Rights states, “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech” and the government acknowledges “the right of the people to bear arms” (Document D). Therefore, the other paper must allot the same freedoms. In the English Bill of Rights, written by Parliament for King William and Queen Mary on February 13, 1689, Parliament describes the freedoms of the citizens of England in the late 1600s. Parliament says, “Freedom of speech… should not be taken away” and “Subjects… may keep arms for their own defense” (Document
A). This shows a striking likeness between both the Bill of Rights and the English Bill of Rights, as both mention the same rights in a similar manner. In conclusion, the American Revolution cannot be considered especially revolutionary. The supposedly ‘progressive’ documents founding America seem to be slightly edited copies of Britain’s existing historical papers.
The reasoning behind the Constitution of the United States is presented as 'based upon the philosophy of Hobbes and the religion of Calvin. It assumes the natural state of mankind in a state of war, and that the carnal mind is at enmity with God.' Throughout, the struggle between democracy and tyranny is discussed as the Founding Fathers who envisioned the Constitution in Philadelphia in 1787 believed not in total democracy, but instead saw common man as selfish and contemptuous, and therefore in need of a 'a good political constitution to control him.' Being a largely propertied body, with the exception of William Few, who was the only one who could honestly be said to represent the majority yeoman farmer class, the highly privileged classes were fearful of granting man his due rights, as the belief that 'man was an unregenerate rebel who has to be controlled' reverberated.
Between 1450 and 1750, many majors changes were going on in Europe and South Asia. In Russia, strong leaders such as Peter the Great and Catherine the Great made various social reforms. In the Middle East, the Gunpowder Empires were flourishing and spreading Islam. In China and Southeast Asia, several power struggles occurred, as well as European trade starting. Although these changes affected society and created unity and conflict, religion being part of politics created both unity and conflict in Europe and South Asia through the Protestant Reformation and the policies of some of the policies of some Mughal rulers.
Ever since unfair British legislation, such as the Intolerable Acts, led to the American Revolution, banding together as a group proved effective in making a change. Organized labor is only another example of how sizable groups make more of an impact on large corporations than one person does. Labor unions improved the positions of workers by causing employers to think twice about wages, giving legal recognition such as lowering work hours and drawing attention to the issue of child labor. The increase in awareness that organized groups caused is what ultimately decided the court case of Muller v, Oregon in 1908, which made it illegal for women to work for more than ten hours a day.
In this paper we will discuss the different point of views on the revolutionary war period that lead up the creation of the constitution between Howard Zinn and Larry Schweikart. It is true that the constitution as created by the rich, however the rich were more educated than the poor at the time, making them the reliable leaders of the society. This said, the rich might have tweaked the Laws to their slight advantage. Schweikart explains the creation of the constitution in order to fulfil the needs of the population. However Zinn emphasizes the fact that the government is controlled by the elites who benefit the most form the foundation of the constitution.
After the American Revolution, America had earned it’s freedom from Britain. In order to govern this new country the Articles of Confederation was created. This document was flawed by the colonists fear of putting too much power into a central government. Knowing the document needed to be fixed a constitutional convention was called. The document created at this convention has been our constitution ever since. But even the Constitution was meet with criticism. One major concern when writing the constitution was how to protect the citizens rights. The Constitution did this through the preamble, the legislative process, the limit of presidential terms, the judicial branch, and the bill of rights.
In the making of the United States, there were many events that are important. This paper intends to highlight a few of those events including; Magna Carta, Mayflower Compact, Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation and the Federalist Papers. Many events in America’s history helped to establish the United States as a free and independent country. The Declaration of Independence in particular explains the rights and freedoms that Americans. Each document is like a stepping stones that leads to the next and building upon the pervious document.
In 1789, the Confederation of the United States, faced with the very real threat of dissolution, found a renewed future with the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. This document created a structure upon which the citizens could build a future free of the unwanted pitfalls and hazards of tyrannies, dictatorship, or monarchies, while securing the best possible prospects for a good life. However, before the establishment of the new United States government, there was a period of dissent over the need for a strong centralized government. Furthermore, there was some belief that the new constitution failed to provide adequate protection for small businessmen and farmers and even less clear protection for fundamental human rights.
The United States of America is one of the most powerful nation-states in the world today. The framers of the American Constitution spent a great deal of time and effort into making sure this power wasn’t too centralized in one aspect of the government. They created three branches of government to help maintain a checks and balance system. In this paper I will discuss these three branches, the legislative, the executive, and the judicial, for both the state and federal level.
This four-page undergraduate paper discusses the opposition that American leaders encountered after the Revolution, as a result of deciding to form a central government. The states feared that such a government would suppress them and would interfere with their internal affairs. Consequently, heated debates and uprisings characterize this period, which started with the framing of Articles in 1777 and ended with the final adoption of the United States constitution in 1787.
After winning the Revolutionary War and sovereign control of their home country from the British, Americans now had to deal with a new authoritative issue: who was to rule at home? In the wake of this massive authoritative usurpation, there were two primary views of how the new American government should function. Whereas part of the nation believed that a strong, central government would be the most beneficial for the preservation of the Union, others saw a Confederation of sovereign state governments as an option more supportive of the liberties American’s fought so hard for in the Revolution. Those in favor of a central government, the Federalists, thought this form of government was necessary to ensure national stability, unity and influence concerning foreign perception. Contrastingly, Anti-Federalists saw this stronger form of government as potentially oppressive and eerily similar to the authority’s tendencies of the British government they had just fought to remove. However, through the final ratification of the Constitution, new laws favoring state’s rights and the election at the turn of the century, one can say that the Anti-Federalist view of America prevails despite making some concessions in an effort to preserve the Union.
As you will see in this paper, I will point out many ways that these documents are still in effect today. In the end, you will understand how the United States of America came about. There are many things that I can compare to the Declaration of Independence and Common Sense pamphlet. Paine states “That government's sole purpose is to protect life, liberty and property, and that a government should be judged solely on the basis of the extent to which it accomplishes this goal.”
Initially, the founders of the country were weary of the abusive nature of a strong executive; therefore, a balance of power amongst three branches of government was established. In regards to war making and the u...
Since the advent of human government, one of the principle fears held by the constituents of the government has always been to prevent any form of tyranny or abuse within it. Tyranny can be loosely described as one person or a group of people having total power in a government leading to the subjugation and oppression of people’s rights. Many new nations wish to eliminate any aspect of their government that may eventually lead to tyranny. The United States was no different in this respect; the framers of the Constitution longed to have no signs of tyranny in their government because they had gone to war with Britain for that very reason. In 1787, a group of fifty-five delegates came from throughout the states to meet in Philadelphia to discuss the problems with the current government. The existing Articles of Confederation posed a monumental problem for these individuals; they recognized that the central government was almost entirely powerless under these articles. Besides this, another problem was that the government lacked a court system or a chief executive. The central government did not possess the power to tax the states either. These problems warranted change which prompted these men to get together. This new constitution they were to create was supposed to guard the people against all kinds of tyranny whether it be of a few, the many or majority, or even a single individual. This seemed virtually insurmountable a task to accomplish but was ultimately achieved. The Constitution guards against tyranny by having a central and state government that cannot overrule or have more power over the other, establishing the separation of powers to keep anyone from abusing it, and having a sys...
The Bill of Rights was crafted in 1791 by James Madison. It was put in place to protect the rights of all people within the borders of the United States when it is applied by the government. It is a very important document that means a lot in the hearts of Americans.
Founded by the forefathers, the government of America shined as a beacon of freedom in a tyrannical world. Because of their discontent with the old monarchy system, the founders wanted to form a new government that limited the consolidation of power in a single ruler’s hand. Eventually, they decided on a three branch system--executive, legislative, and judicial-- meant to ensure a “balance between society’s need for order and individual’s rights,” the founders enacted the separation of powers in the new government (“The Court and Constitutional…”). In 1789, President George Washington signed the Judiciary Act, officially commencing a start to a new judicial branch that contained the Supreme Court as the highest tribunal of America’s legal system