Antony And Brutus Persuasive Speeches

1806 Words4 Pages

Brutus and Mark Antony are two characters from William Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar. Brutus is a senator in 44B.C conspiring to kill Caesar, the leader of Rome. On the other hand, Mark Antony is also a senator in 44B.C, but is trying to help Caesar lead Rome. Both want what is best for Rome .Brutus and Antony give a speech to the people. Their speeches have a lot of persuasive techniques. However, each has a different purpose for the speech and each arrives at a different conclusion as to what is best for Rome
Mark Antony and Brutus both use persuasive language techniques. Both use ethos and rule of three at the beginning of their speech. Brutus says” Romans, countrymen, and lovers” and Antony said “Friends, Romans, Countrymen". In addition …show more content…

Brutus gave his speech for many reasons but, the main reason is to help the people understand why the conspirators killed Caesar. Brutus wanted to calm down the people. "hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear. Believe me, for honor, and respect to mine honor, that you may believe". After he accomplished this he told them that he had to kill Caesar for the better of Rome. Brutus stated that he did not want to kill his friend that he loved him, but he had to for the better of Rome. Brutus than told the citizens what he thought Caesar would have done if he was still alive. He told the citizens Caesar was going to turn them all into slaves. "had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves. Than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?". Brutus asks the people if he did right by asking them if they would rather die slaves than be free men. Continues to the speech Brutus asked the people if he did anything wrong by killing Caesar. If they would have rather been slaves. Brutus just wanted the people to know that he will keep them save Next Antony gave his speech. Antony gave his speech to show everyone who Cesar truly was. He told the citizens many times how honorable Brutus was, so many it could make the citizen almost question if Brutus was actually honorable. Mark Antony than talked about all the great things Caesar did. Antony remanded the people of good things Caesar did as king. ” …show more content…

Brutus thought if Caesar was gone would be best for Rome.” with this I depart, that as I slew my best lover for the good of Rome, I have the same dagger for myself, when it shall please my country to need my death." Brutus thought Caesar was going to destroy Rome. Enslaved and tortured its people. He came to the conclusion that if Caesar would die Rome would stay as it was. In Brutus's point of view, Caesar was a threat to Rome instead of a help. On the other hand, Mark Antony thought completely opposite of Brutus. Antony thought Caesar would have help Rome grow and be better. Caesar had already done such good things before. Someone who helps the captives, the poor, and refuses the crown could never be as evil as Brutus says. Caesar would have protected Rome. Caesar was a good, humble man, and the best king for Rome around. "But yesterday the world of Caesar might have stood against the world; now lies he there". In Antony's point of view, Caesar was what Rome need he would not have threatened

Open Document