Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The analysis of Brutus as a tragic hero
The analysis of Brutus as a tragic hero
Caesar vs Brutus comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The analysis of Brutus as a tragic hero
There are a lot of similarities and differences between Brutus and Mark Antony speeches at Caesar funeral. Both speeches are very convincing and persuasive to the crowd. This essay will be about comparing and contrasting the two speeches. In my opinion I think that Mark Antony’s speech was better and more convincing. In Brutus speech he wants the crowd to forgive him for killing Caesar and make him the new leader of Rome. The first word of Brutus speech is Romans, and later in the speech he says that he loved Caesar but loved Rome more, also in the begging part of the play we found out that he does everything for Rome. The crowd does not want to listen to him and keeping yelling at him, he keeps telling the crowd to be quiet, listen, and be patient. He finally gets the crowd to calm down. He told the crowd that Caesar would have made them his slaves and that Caesar was too ambitious and would have been killed. The crowd reacts to suprised. Brutus tries to have their trust by saying that if they don't agree with him they can kill him. The whole speech Brutus stands above the crowd and does not move much. At the end of the speech the crowd is all for Brutus and wants him to be king. …show more content…
He brings Caesar body down to crowd and lays it down in front of them. Antony is trying to convince the crowd that killing Caesar was wrong and that they need to avenge his death. His first word of the speech was Friends, Romans, Countrymen, I think he said friends first because he wanted to show that he was a friend of the people and that he is their for them. His whole speech he stood with the crowd and moved around with them and was one of them. The entire speech of Antony was a
By saying this, Antony is showing how he was as a friend To Caesar and is showing his loyalty and faith to him to tell the audience how great Caesar was.
Brutus vs Antony The most predominate and important aspect in the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main characters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd, using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure, Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s. Both speakers used an ethical appeal to the crowd and established their credibility.
...rence between these speeches is obviously that they had different views. As said earlier, Brutus was trying to approach that killing Caesar was a good deed for Rome, while Antony’s view is that Caesar did not deserve to die and that the conspirators were the real enemies. They also used their rhetorical devices in different ways to state their points, persuading different people in the audience.
At the funeral oration Brutus gives Mark Antony permission to speak, in doing so the crowd turns on Brutus, in favor to what Antony has to say about Caesar. As Mark Antony gives his clever speech, the crowd turns on Brutus and is in favor of Antony.
Brutus’ leadership and compassion for others make him a popular figure amongst the Roman people, and it is his reputation that establishes him as an influential individual. For example, despite the fact that Brutus loves Caesar like a brother, he warily joins the conspiracy to assassinate him. He does this because he believes that Caesar’s ambition would become tyranny and that Caesar’s death is a necessary evil in order to preserve the liberties of the Roman people. In his own words Brutus claims, “It must be by his death; and for my part, I know no personal cause to spurn at him, but for the general.”(Act 2, Scene 1, Page 1116). In addition, Brutus takes the reins of authority from Cassius and becomes the leader of the conspiracy. He gains this prerogative because of his convincing tongue and powerful influence. His leadership is evidenced when he begins to challenge Cassius’ ideas. When Cassius asks the conspirators to “swear our resolution”(Act 2...
Analysis of the Funeral Speeches of Brutus and Marc Antony from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar At the funeral of Julius Caesar two characters make speeches to the plebeian mob, Brutus and Marc Antony. Shakespeare shows us the personalities of the two orators and gives one an advantage over the other. Marc Antony has an advantage over Brutus because he speaks after Brutus and he has Caesar’s body. He also interrupts Brutus’ speech.
As a final point, Antony and Brutus both spoke at Caesar’s funeral to prove their reasoning’s to the people. Antony’s speech turned out to be the more effective one because he manipulates the words ambitious and honorable to contradict Brutus, he uses props to provide substantial evidence to the people, and his speech was more effective because it essentially persuaded the people to be on his side whereas Brutus did not convince the people of anything.
Law enforcement, entrusted with the duty to protect and serve, has the potential to inflict more harm than good. Nowhere is this more evident than in the systemic failings of serving Indigenous communities. Drawing from her own experiences as a member of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians, Angeline Boulley, shines the light on the concerning dynamic that exists between Indigenous communities and law enforcement in her novel Firekeeper’s Daughter. Set in Sault Ste.
Brutus, in the novel Julius Caesar, went through three simple steps which are necessary in becoming a tragic hero. First he brought down Caesar thinking he had good intentions. Then he realized he had done wrong and knew that there would be consequences. Finally he went through a downfall, but even after death he was still honorable. Good intentions, realization, and an unfortunate but honorable downfall are the qualities that make Brutus a tragic hero and not a villain.
The play Julius Caesar depicts Brutus to be an extremely noble being who is well respected and honored by all Romans, even his enemies. Brutus was a loving friend of Julius Caesar and wished anything but death on his comrade, but his love and dedication to the majestic city of Rome would force him to commit anything. He fights a war to defend Rome from a king or emperor's tyrannical rule. When the war was finished, even his enemies saw that he was the most respectable Roman of them all.
The crowd responds to show what is going on. Antony then responds by reading off of the will of Caesar to gain the attention of the crowd. He is delivering the speech only because he wants to address his feelings and thoughts on Caesar’s death and how he feels about the conspirators. Antony is trying to persuade the crowd to see what he sees and feel how he feels about the whole ordeal. The crowd, of course, is easily moved and persuaded by Antony’s
Brutus made his speech effective in persuading the people by using tone and rhetorical devices. Brutus was compassionate when referring to how he loved Caesar as much as Caesar`s friends of his speech. Brutus was showing compassion on lines18 - 20 when he said, "If there be any in this assembly, any dear friend of Caesar's, to him I say that Brutus's love to Caesar was no less than his." Brutus said this to help the people understand the sorrow he felt for the loss of Caesar, but he felt he killed Caesar for the good of Rome. Brutus anticipated an objection by the people when he said he loved Caesar , so he went on to say on lines 20 - 23, "If then that friend demand why Brutus rose against Caesar, this is my answer: Not that I love Caesar less, but Rome more."Brutus manipulated the people with rhetorical questions. He asks them on lines 29 - 33, " who is so base, that they would be a bondman, who is so rude, that they would not be a Roman, and who is so vile, that will not love his country," the people do not want to be against their country nor do they want to be so base to be a slave....
He talked about how Caesar was ambitious according to Brutus who is an honorable man and how he brought captives to Rome who had brought more wealth into the city. Later in the speech Antony persuaded the crowd by bringing up Caesar's will which everyone wanted to hear about. Antony made everyone think that he wasn’t going to read the will which got everyone interested and begging him to read it. Later, he finally told the people about the will and he concluded his speech by making them angry and bloodthirsty. Antony showed the people where Casca, Cassius, and Brutus had stabbed Caesar.
Once Caesar is killed, Brutus speaks to the people in a funeral speech that both manipulates the people, and shows how much he has changed as a man due to the conspiracy. He feels that he justifies his actions with love, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more” (3.2.20-22). Brutus is tricking the people with his ‘love’ in order to not be arrested for killing his best friend. This shows no matter how ‘noble’ Brutus may be that he is not above manipulating the crowds. At that time, his method appears to have worked
Brutus’ speech at Caesar’s funeral is said in order the people of Rome, to better understand why the blood of Caesar was spilt. “Only be patient till we have appeased the multitude, beside themselves with fear” (74). Brutus realizes that the assassination would not look good in the eyes of the civilians; until explained. “Our reasons are so full of good regard that were you, Antony, the son of Caesar, you should be satisfied” (76). He truly believes that what was done, had to be done, for the good of Rome.