Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between us and China
Racism in the united states
The development of racism in America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relationship between us and China
Jacqueline Maier
04.19.17
Pacific World History
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free”…except No Chinese
Anti-Chinese sentiment of the United States was influenced by a complex interaction of factors. The initial racism was a product of common culture and lingering racial tensions of the Civil War. Racist portrayals of Chinese coolie labor developed into a negative caricature of the Chinese. Their character and intent in the US were perpetually called into question. Simultaneously, economic elements promoted a dislike for the Chinese. A vast influx of Chinese workers were entering the US and “stealing” US gold and jobs. This public hostility towards Chinese immigrants evolved into a politicized
…show more content…
agenda. Dislike for the Chinese was no longer simply a dinner conversation; it was sanctioned by the federal government. However, not all US citizens supported this blatant racism. Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Journal cartoon, The Only One Barred Out, depicts the other side of the “Chinese Question.” The image was published less than two weeks before the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act was introduced in the House of Representatives. The artist, while unknown, mocks the obvious injustice of the racism and accompanying legislation barring the Chinese from entering the US. The Only One Barred Out exhibits the lengths lawmakers and society were willing to go to ensure the Chinese were not granted entry to the “supposed” Golden Gate of Liberty, and the artist’s disgust for this process. The anti-Chinese mentality of most Americans can be summarized by the phrase, “Yellow Peril.” While it applied to all Asian immigrants, it can be understood, in this context, as a psycho-cultural perception of the Chinese. The Yellow Peril describes the fear and distaste for the Chinese and the associated bad qualities brought with them to their points of immigration, such as disease, drug use, and immoral or alien cultural practices. The Yellow Peril was more racial than national in nature, not necessarily a fear derived from a specific attribute of China, but from a vague existential fear of the endless, faceless, unknown horde of Chinese from a foreign world. This attitude encouraged the creation of legislation that targeted the exclusion of Chinese immigrants. Prior to the publication of the cartoon, legislation was introduced at the state level, in response to Chinese immigration. The first significant Chinese immigration occurred with the California Gold Rush of 1848-1955. The Chinese mentality was characterized as the desire to head to California and make instant wealth. There was a perceived limited desire to assimilate to American culture and their earned money was often sent back to China, in the hopes that family may join them in America.
The immigration continued with subsequent large-scale labor projects, such as the building of the Transcontinental Railroad. During the early stages of the Gold Rush, the Chinese were tolerated. As gold and jobs became increasingly sparse, competition increased in conjunction with an aversion for the Chinese. California citizens pressured the state legislature to exclude all foreign miners, as many believed the Chinese were taking gold that belonged to the US. This led to the Chinese Police Tax Law of April 26, 1862. This law was enacted to protect free white labor against competition with Chinese coolie labor, and to discourage the immigration of the Chinese into the state of California by implementing a monthly tax of $2.50 on Chinese immigrants seeking to do business in California. The signing of this law was the signal that acknowledged and accepted subsequent state-sanctioned racism. The Chinese were segregated in schools, banned from sections of cities, subject to additional taxes and were prohibited from marrying white citizens. In 1854, the Appellate Supreme Court of California ruled that …show more content…
the testimony of a Chinese man who witnessed a murder by a white man was inadmissible. This decision was based upon the fact that the Chinese were “a race of people whom nature has marked as inferior”, and due to their minimal intellectual capacity and difference in culture, had no right to participate in government affairs or to “swear away the life of a white citizen.” The 1860s welcomed the second significant wave of Chinese immigration; a large portion of whom were employed by the Transcontinental Railroad. Chinese immigrants composed upwards of ninety percent of the Transcontinental Railroad workforce, as white citizens did not want to participate in the arduous work. Despite the fact that Chinese workers earned a reputation as quiet and industrious workers, they continued to receive lower pay than their white counterparts and were responsible for providing their own food and shelter. Upon the completion of the Transcontinental Railroad, the Chinese flocked to cities in search of jobs, cities such as San Francisco. Often, the Chinese were willing to work for less desirable jobs and cheaper wages than the white American working class. The Chinese undercut of whites’ wages provoked the emergence of racist labor movements in the US. Despite obvious distress over the growing Chinese population in America and ensuing violence, the US signed the Burlingame Treaty of 1868, which established basic measures that aimed to ease immigration restrictions and protected Chinese citizens in the US, in an effort to reinforce US trade interests in China. This treaty was eventually revised in 1880, and renegotiated under the name the Treaty of Regulating Immigration from China, which suspended Chinese immigration. The rationale was that Chinese laborers in the US, “affect or threaten to affect the interests of that country, or to endanger the good order” of the US. In 1875, Congress passed the Page Act, which greatly limited the immigration of Chinese women to the US, with the justification that they posed a moral threat as likely prostitutes. In 1879, California adopted a new constitution which explicitly authorized the government to regulate which individuals were allowed to reside in the state and banned the Chinese from seeking work in any form of government. The efforts of the Workingman’s Party, along with various anti-Chinese groups and political leaders advocated for a federal campaign against the “barbaric” and “heathen” Chinese. Those who ran for political office capitalized on this racist push, by linking their political platform to anti-Asian efforts, as a means to gain the white working-class vote. Rapidly, public prejudice and discrimination shifted to the federal political sphere, culminating in the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, signed into law May 6th. The Chinese Exclusion Act, bolstered by previous legislative efforts, is the first and only law to prohibit a specific ethnic group from immigrating to the US. While the Chinese Exclusion Act was not passed before the publication of the cartoon, the author was clearly aware of the direction in which the federal government was headed when considering the future of Chinese immigration. The image depicts a stereotypical Chinese man, illustrated by his long braid and traditional Chinese apparel. He sits, dejected, on his luggage, outside the Golden Gate of Liberty. His luggage reads “Industry”, “Order”, “Peace”, and “Sobriety.” Beside him, a notice reads “Notice – Communist, Nihilist, Socialist, Fenian & Hoodlum Welcome but No Admittance to Chinamen.” The image is captioned, “The Only One Barred Out. Enlightened American Statesmen ‘We must draw the line somewhere, you know.’” The image highlights the specificity and absurdity, according to the cartoonist, of anti-Chinese efforts. According to the notice, not only are Chinese immigrants barred from entering the US, but “undesirable” immigrants such as hoodlums or Socialists, who will likely bring corruption to the US, are allowed to enter. The following caption, “we have to draw the line somewhere you know” further illustrates the entirely arbitrary process by which the Chinese were targeted and discriminated against. From the author’s viewpoint, not only are the other immigrant groups more problematic than the Chinese, but the Chinese actually bring with them benefits, such as Industry, Order, Sobriety, and Peace, as shown by the Chinese man’s luggage. The inclusion of the “Golden Gates of Liberty” alludes to its phoniness, as an immigrant remains barred outside its very gates. His expression, one of exhaustion and defeat, is possibly due to the fact that he may be unable to be reunited with his family due to stringent immigration policies, that he is unable to find work or that he is barred from becoming a naturalized US citizen, even if granted entry to the US. Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Journal, was based in New York. The newspaper possibly published this image since the east coast of the US was not as strongly affected, economically and culturally, by the wave of Chinese immigration, as most Chinese immigrants settled on the west coast. Additionally, the Northeast had often been a place with less racist ideologies, especially following the recent Civil War, so northeast newspapers were potentially more sympathetic to the tribulations of being a Chinese immigrant in the US. The artist and this image strive to capture the hypocrisy and injustice associated with anti-Chinese legislation, which was nothing less than the legal endorsement of racism. The Only One Barred Out is the response to the reprehensible chain of events that led to the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.
The cartoon ridicules the tornado of political, economic, and social influences that elicited an irrationally strong sense of suspicion, fear, and loathing of the Chinese. A combination of elements so strong that an entire ethnicity was banned from the US, despite the fact that it violated the very foundation the US was built upon, the land of freedom. The cartoon of Frank Leslie’s Illustrated Newspaper works to remind America of its duty to justice for all, and its unforgiveable misstep in supporting the legalization of anti-Chinese
racism.
In port cities of China, leaflets distributed by labor brokers said, “Americans are very rich people. They want the Chinamen to come and make him very welcome. There you will have great pay, large houses, and good clothing of the finest description. Money is in great plenty and to spare in America.”
Many came for gold and job opportunities, believing that their stay would be temporary but it became permanent. The Chinese were originally welcomed to California being thought of as exclaimed by Leland Stanford, president of Central Pacific Railroad, “quiet, peaceable, industrious, economical-ready and apt to learn all the different kinds of work” (Takaki 181). It did not take long for nativism and white resentment to settle in though. The Chinese, who started as miners, were taxed heavily; and as profits declined, went to work the railroad under dangerous conditions; and then when that was done, work as farm laborers at low wages, open as laundry as it took little capital and little English, to self-employment. Something to note is that the “Chinese laundryman” was an American phenomenon as laundry work was a women’s occupation in China and one of few occupations open to the Chinese (Takaki 185). Chinese immigrants were barred from naturalized citizenship, put under a status of racial inferiority like blacks and Indians as with “Like blacks, Chinese men were viewed as threats to white racial purity” (188). Then in 1882, due to economic contraction and racism Chinese were banned from entering the U.S. through the Chinese Exclusion Act. The Chinese were targets of racial attacks, even with the enactment of the 1870 Civil Rights Act meaning equal protection under federal law thanks to Chinese merchants lobbying Congress. Chinese tradition and culture as well as U.S. condition and laws limited the migration of women. Due to all of this, Chinese found strength in ethnic solidarity as through the Chinese Six Companies, which is considered a racial project. Thanks to the earthquake of 1906 in San Francisco, the Chinese fought the discriminatory laws by claiming citizenship by birth since the fires
One particular ethnic group that suffered severe discrimination was the Chinese people. They first came to America for several reasons. One of them was the gold rush in California in 1849, in which they were included in a group of immigrants called the “Forty-Niners” (179). From gold mining, they switched to other jobs with resulted in the rise of anti-Chinese sentiments. People felt that Chinese people were taking the jobs away from them, because Chinese people worked for much smaller salaries that businesses preferred. This mindset gave way to the creation of The Chinese Exclusion Act passed in 1882, which prohibits more Chinese immigrants from coming to America. In addition, the act states “no State or court of the United States shall admit Chinese to citizenship”. Like the Naturalization Act, the Chinese Exclusion Act was created to hinder Chinese people from becoming citizens so that America could remain homogenously white (186). It also aimed to stop Chinese people from establishing a bigger community in the country in hopes of eliminating the threat of competition to their white counterparts (186). Like African-Americans, Chinese people were considered racially inferior and have struggled to prove that they were worthy to be called true Americans, rather than
This investigation is designed to explore to what extent did attitudes toward the Chinese immigrants during the building of the transcontinental railroad differ from those towards Irsih immigrants? To assess the attitudes toward the Chinese immigrants, this study focuses on the building of the transcontinental railroad in the United States in the second half of the nineteenth century. This study investigates the views, tasks given during the building of the railroad, and benefits given to the Chinese and Irish immigrants and the impact of their work on the views toward each group of immigrants.
Despite the successful trade market between China and the U.S. the textbook Created Equal makes the point that there was a strict opposition to Chinese immigrants. The Chinese Exclusion Act was approved by Congress in 1882 that sought to keep Chinese immigrants out. In the essay Linking a Continent and a Nation by Jack Chen throughout he argues of the importance of Chinese labor in the construction of the transcontinental railroad and the failure of the U.S. government in acknowledging this labor force. During the 1920s a hatred for Jews and Catholics grew due to the skyrocketing of Judeo-Christian values. Furthermore, during the Red Scare during the early 20th century resulted in the unfair internment of Japanese-Americans. In 1924, the end of European immigration was discussed in class. These are important to the relationship the United States has with the world since they are all the pinnacle of American nationalism and exceptionalism. As discussed in class of the aftermath of 9/11 of the new foreign policy that called for the elimination of any superpower right from the gecko post-cold war. The diffusion of western culture has also caused a Mcdonaldization effect of the consumption of pop culture. Consumerism has left many businesses resorting to outsourcing to third world countries for cheap labor. The 2016 presidential election saw a rise in fake news of racism and violence with the presidential elect Donald Trump. The outcome of this presidential election was discussed in class with an agreement of a loss in stature for the United States in the eyes of other
Throughout history, Americans have always been intimidated by immigrants. The idea of an immigrant coming to America and easily being able to get a job scared Americans. Americans feared that good jobs would be taken from hard working Americans and given to immigrants for less pay because they required less money to live on or were used to no wages or lower wages in their Country of origin. People would immigrate to America in search of a better life, and often times they could find homes and jobs that made them want to stay. A melting pot is described as being a mixing of different cultures into one universal culture. In Erika Lee’s, The Chinese Exclusion Example, immigrant exclusion helped re-define the melting-pot
American objections to Chinese immigration took many forms, and generally stemmed from economic and cultural tensions, as well as ethnic discrimination. Most Chinese laborers who came to the United States did so in order to send money back to China to support their families there. At the same time, they also had to repay loans to the Chinese merchants who paid their passage to America. These financial pressures left them little choice but to work for whatever wages they could.
Yang, Gene Luen, and Lark Pien. American Born Chinese. New York: First Second, 2006. Print.
Gold Rush 1849 was the reason for such a frenzy. It caused people to migrate to California from near and far too dig for gold from the river. According to the film, The Chinese Exclusion Act Explained: US History Review, “This attracted Chinese entrepreneurs to try to make it rich”. The Chinese was one of the cultures that was one of the cultures that left their home to find a better life for their families. However, after being greeted in the United States, they were discriminated against them since they were feared by the Europeans. Racism towards the Chinese immigrant caused a lot of hardship on them in the Western civilization, enabling them to enter or exit without returning to the States.
in large groups on the West Coast between 1850s and 1860s to work in the gold mines and railroads. They encountered a very strong opposition violent as riots and physical attacks forced them out of the gold mines (citation needed). The Central Pacific railroad hired thousands.But after the line was finished in 1869 they were hounded out of many railroad towns in states such as Wyoming and Nevada. “Most wound up in Chinatowns or areas of large cities which the police largely ignored. The Chinese were further alleged to be "coolies" and were said to be not suitable for becoming independent thoughtful voters because of their control by tongs. “The same negative reception hit the Asians who migrated to Mexico and Canada”.
The first Chinese immigrants to arrive in America came in the early 1800s. Chinese sailors visited New York City in the 1830s (“The Chinese Experience”); others came as servants to Europeans (“Chinese Americans”). However, these immigrants were few in number, and usually didn’t even st...
Kwong, Peter. 1999 “Forbidden Workers: Illegal Chinese Immigrants and American Labor” Publisher: The New Press.
June 25, 1798 . The Act was the first federal legislation that dealt with the
Millions of immigrants over the previous centuries have shaped the United States of America into what it is today. America is known as a “melting pot”, a multicultural country that welcomes and is home to an array of every ethnic and cultural background imaginable. We are a place of opportunity, offering homes and jobs and new economic gains to anyone who should want it. However, America was not always such a “come one, come all” kind of country. The large numbers of immigrants that came during the nineteenth century angered many of the American natives and lead to them to blame the lack of jobs and low wages on the immigrants, especially the Asian communities. This resentment lead to the discrimination and legal exclusion of immigrants, with the first and most important law passed being the Chinese Exclusion Act. However, the discrimination the Chinese immigrants so harshly received was not rightly justified or deserved. With all of their contributions and accomplishments in opening up the West, they were not so much harming our country but rather helping it.
It is as though Asian Americans are succumbing to the thought that America is the only place to be and that they should be grateful to live here. On the other hand, keeping silent due to pressures from the white population means being shunned by the members of the Asian American population. I disagree with Chin’s assertion that “years of apparent silence have made us accomplices” to the makers of stereotypes (Chin 1991, xxxix). I agree with Hongo’s argument that the Chin viewpoint “limits artistic freedom” (Hongo 4). Declaring that those writers who do not argue stereotypes of the good, loyal, and feminine Chinese man or the submissive female, are in any way contributing to or disagreeing with them is ridiculous.