Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Same sex marriage essay
The concepts of freedom in America today
Same sex marriage essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Same sex marriage essay
Jouet, Mugambi. “Why Gay Marriage Is So Controversial in America.” The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 1 June 2012. Web. 14 Nov. 2016 Since Barak Obama’s decision to support gay marriage had turned into a huge controversial topic and how it may affect the presidential election and the future of gay marriage in the United States. Many U.S. states didn’t recognize the importance of gay marriage and gay rights and how most gay couples do not feel like their opinion or freedom matters. The main topic of the article was that gay marriage rights should be allowed to everyone in the United States because that’s what being an American is all about, freedom. “Gay Marriage – ProCon.org.” ProConorg Headlines. N.p., 3 May 2016. Web. 14 Nov. 2016. …show more content…
There are at least 1,138 benefits, rights, and protections available to married couples in federal law. The article talks about the general accounting office and the assessments it’s made throughout the years. Usually, benefits are only to married couples which includes hospital visitation during an illness, access to health care, and to reduce a tax burden. The article also mentions how on October 2, 2009 the New York Times projected that same sex couples usually deny their benefits because they don’t feel as if it’s needed or given to them willingly. “LGBT Activists Rejoice after Australia Scraps Plan for Nationwide Marriage Vote.” LGBTQ Nation RSS. N.p., 8 Nov. 2016. Web. 14 Nov. 2016. The article speaks about how gay rights advocates welcomed Australia’s Senate decision to plan a government nonbinding public vote on recognizing gay marriage. They mention how they called on parliament to legislate for marriage equality soon because they only feel as if it’s right. Even some lawmakers said they would vote down gay marriage even if others vote for equality, they don’t believe it’s correct. Although, the article states how the opponents do support support gay marriage, most advocates don’t and are in conflict with the decision. Lastly, the article ended with a fact stating that, “Clearly in the last 24 hours we’ve had a very significant and historic step in the path to achieving marriage equality.” Konrai, Lauren. “Same-Sex Marriage Controversial Issue.” Same-Sex Marriage Controversial Issue. Lauren Konrai, 01 Jan. 1970. Web. 14 Nov. 2016. The main argument in this article is that same-sex marriage has been a controversial issue all over the world.
In Africa, same sex marriage is illegal, but is legal in parts of America and other countries. Lauren mentions how in some countries, people who are in a same-sex marriage are even punished and sent to death because of it. She also mentions how in parts of Asia, Europe, and Native America... Same sex marriages were seen as disgusting ceremonies to people against it. Lastly, Lauren ends the article with speaking about “Prop 8” and how it involves legalizing same-sex marriage and the benefits it will do for the society and country today. “A Right to Marry? Same-sex Marriage and Constitutional Law | Dissent Magazine.” Dissent Magazine. Martha Nussbaum, 8 June 2009. Web. 14 Nov. 2016. Martha starts the article by saying that even if people have been married by their church or religious group they are not married in the way that really counts, a marriage license by the state. A lot of religions deny to marry people who are convicted felons and do something illegal or not “god liked.” The article states that, “Although some religions refuse to marry people who seem ill-prepared for marriage, the state does not turn such people away.” Martha comments on how only some people and depending on what you might have done, if you’re wanting a same sex marriage, it might be granted or might …show more content…
not. Esseks, James. “Gay Marriage Is Legal, but We’re Still Not Equal.” The Daily Beast. Newsweek/Daily Beast, 8 Sept. 2015. Web. 14 Nov. 2016. James brings up how 10 years ago he would never believe the gay rights movement would face a fight over.
He states, “When we’re denied services related to our weddings, we don’t have full marriage recognition.” He mentions a couple once told him how they were once told by the government clerk to go to the next town over to obtain a marriage license because they weren’t going to issue one to them. James talk about the inequality that goes on in the world when it comes to gay marriage and asks himself, what is the big issue? Why can’t people be allowed to marry who they want to marry and be happy? “What is so wrong with that?” he
asks. Allen, Samantha. “The Gay Rights Letdown Is Here.” The Daily Beast. Newsweek/Daily Beast, 20 Jan. 2016. Web. 14 Nov. 2016. The article starts by saying that new data from GLAAD shows that many Americans believe LGBT equality. The article states,”30 percent of non-LGBT respondents said they feel uncomfortable when they see a same-sex couple holding hands.” The main concern about the issue was what’s the big deal about seeing a same-sex couple hold hands? How in any way would that affect you emotionally, mentally, or physically? Samantha points out how gay rights is a letdown to people but to others it’s a way of life. She says, “There is nothing wrong with loving who you love.” Feeling though that people tend to be harsh on others and their beliefs and put their opinion where it’s not necessary. Bui, Quoctrung. “The Most Detailed Map of Gay Marriage in America.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 15 Sept. 2016. Web. 14 Nov. 2016. Through the article, Quoctrung claims how there isn’t actual record of how many same sex marriages are in America. He claims that the federal government doesn’t necessarily keep track therefor there is not an exact number or estimate for how many marriages there are or could be. He does say, “Sane sex female couples are four times more likely to have children than same-sex male couples.” Following that he includes how being in a same sex marriage or relationship, you are still allowed to have kids. The article was based off of research Quoctrung found and gathered it together to make a more resourceful claim with statistics and facts involved.
Abstract On June 26, 2015 a divided Supreme Court ruled in the landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges that same-sex couples could now marry nationwide. At the time of the split ruling there were 9 supreme court justices, 5 of the justices were Republicans, and the remaining 4 were Democrats. In high profile cases it is except that the justices will vote along party lines. When the 5-4 ruling was reveled by the following statement. “It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right (Corn,2015).” written by
Thomas B. Stoddard’s “Gay Marriages: Make Them Legal” is a successfully written argument with some minor flaws in technique. Stoddard uses this article to present his major claim, or central thesis, on the reasons gay marriage should be legalized. He presents his argument using minor claims. In a lecture on February 2, 2005, James McFadden stated a minor claim is the secondary claim in an argument. Stoddard uses minor claims in his discussion of homosexual people being denied their rights by the government and by others who discriminate against them. He also discusses how love and the desire for commitment play a big part in the argument for and against gay marriage.
The constitutional right of gay marriage is a hot topic for debate in the United States. Currently, 37 states have legal gay marriage, while 13 states have banned gay marriage. The two essays, "What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage?" by Katha Pollitt and "Gay "Marriage": Societal Suicide" by Charles Colson provide a compare and contrast view of why gay marriage should be legal or not. Pollitt argues that gay marriage is a constitutional human right and that it should be legal, while Colson believes that gay marriage is sacrilegious act that should not be legal in the United States and that “it provides a backdrop for broken families and increases crime rates” (Colson, pg535). Both authors provide examples to support their thesis. Katha Pollitt provides more relevant data to support that gay marriage is a constitutional right and should be enacted as law in our entire country, she has a true libertarian mindset.
The two texts examined within, present the opposing extremes of views regarding gay and lesbian marriage. The first text entitled Let Gays Marry by Andrew Sullivan examines the intricacies of same sex relationships and why homosexual couples should be allowed to publicly show affection for one another. The second text that will be examined is titled Leave Marriage Alone written by William Bennett. Bennett gives his views on why couples of same sex nature should not be allowed to engage in marital relations. These two authors, although very different, each has a view of the ideals of marriage, and how it should be presented to the public.
The U.S. has recognized marriage as a basic human right by many court cases including Loving v Virginia. Since protecting the marriage of a black-Cherokee woman and a white man, the case has also helped support the legalization of same-sex marriage in all 50 states. This is important because it creates a more united America by knocking down social constraints that disallowed the 5-10% of America identified as homosexual from being married. In the same way as blacks were not allowed to vote, gay couples were not allowed to marry. The legalization of same-sex marriage is helping bridge the split in social order of America by not outlawing same-sex couples for being “immoral” and implying the couples are less-deserving of marriage than a heterosexual relationship. The change of expanding the 14th amendment’s meaning of equal protection of rights for all citizens, in this case for marriage, is helping people treat each other as equivalent and allowing the country to take another step towards liberty and justice for
Lisa Miller uses the Bible as a basis for her argument for gay marriage in her essay "Our Mutual Joy: The Religious Case for Gay Marriage". She first begins her argument by saying that neither the Old Testament nor the New Testament show model examples for marriage. Therefore, neither a homosexual or heterosexual couple would want to look to the Bible for marriage advice. Instead, the Bible should be read for its universal truths. Miller goes onto say that there is no real definition of marriage in the Bible, and the laws and guidelines in the Bible were put in place for a culture that no longer exists. If Christians no longer subscribe to animal sacrifice, then why would they condemn homosexuality? She ends by discussing the fact that Jesus ' message was one of inclusion. So, all those who claim to follow the Bible 's teachings should love others regardless of their sexual orientation.
A debate is raging in America about who people have a right to marry. In response to lesbians and gays asking for the right to marry, many legislators are writing laws to ban same-sex marriage in their respective states. Even President Bush supports a Constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage (prez.bush.marriage/). Opponents of such legislation do not want discrimination passed into law and are protesting at every opportunity. One must understand the reasons that people want to ban same-sex marriage before he or she can effectively argue about the subject. Many advocates of same-sex marriage bans say that allowing gays and lesbians to marry would degrade the institution of marriage because marriage is only supposed to exist between a man and woman. In addition, allowing same-sex marriage would cause problems for society (Issues and Controversies on File). One theory why opponents may fight against same-sex marriages is that heterosexual marriages have long reinforced traditional gender roles within marriage and that allowing same-sex marriages would cause males to lose their authority to subordinate females as heterosexual couples begin to model same-sex marriage gender equality (Calhoun 157).
As granted by the United States Constitution, everyone is entitled to equal rights. The Supreme Court of the United States recently ruled that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage. Gay rights are forgotten many times and equal rights for same-sex marriage are often ignored. For this reason, federal authorities have left policymaking regarding this topic up to individual state governments. Many people throughout the United States, and across the world, have extremely different views on the subject; some because of religious reasons, others because of family, others because of how they were raised. The policy of gay marriage and equal rights is an extremely touchy subject, and is much deeper than what it may seem.
The Supreme Court ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage. A recent news said that US president Barack Obama was pleased with the end of the passing a gay marriage law in New York state. New York will become the largest and latest state to legalize gay marriage. And the US leader said “it’s the time to allow the matrimony between gays for a nationwide policy” [2]. According to many years for fighting of the legalized same-sex marriage, gays and lesbians finally can marriage in the accept law. Gay marriage has been hotly debated in the news lately. While several countries have some form of gay marriage on the books, the Netherlands recently became the first country to give same-sex couples in civil unions the same rights as heterosexual married couples [1]. In my opinion, same-sex marriage should become an established and accepted institution in societies around the world.
Johnson, Ramon. "Same-Sex Marriage In New York: A Summary of Gay Marriage in New York." About.com. The New York Times Company, 04 Nov 2009. Web. 18 Jul 2010. .
Many nations around the world used to ban same-sex marriage or gay marriage. Still, support for same-sex marriage or gay marriage has increase over time, people started slowly adjusting themselves to changes in society. At this time, there are only four states that recognize same-sex marriage and a few more...
Can you imagine how it would feel if you were told you could not marry the one you love? Many homosexual couples are facing this mayhem in their life. But did you know that this is a form of discrimination? That’s right. There are many homosexual couples being denied the right to marry because of their sexual orientation. Same-sex marriage is between two people of the same sex or gender identity. As same-sex couples in today’s world, couples are vulnerable to physical and emot...
Marriage is both a religious and civil institution, with rich variations among different religions in this country. Civil marriage is state regulated and is independent of religious practice, a distinction that reflects the core American value of the separation of church and state. This distinction also is at the heart of this publication, which provides resources and inspiration for people from communities of faith who wish to support the nationwide struggle to help lesbians and gay men win the freedom to have civil marriages.
...ney by selling marriage licenses and along with that comes weddings, more selling houses, and more business. Especially since religion is supposed to be disassociated from state and the constitution there is no true reason why we cannot get rid of the traditional definition of marriage and make a change so that people who desire same-sex marriage can have their right to what they believe is marriage. Homosexuals should have the right to marry those of the same sex if that is what they so desire without having to be judged, discriminated against, or harassed just because of their sexual orientation. This controversial issue is making tremendous progress over the last century and it should result in granting homosexuals the ability to marry a person whom is the same sex without being treated differently from a straight person as they shouldn’t be viewed differently.
Laycock, Douglas, Anthony R. Picarello, and Robin Fretwell. Wilson. Same-sex Marriage and Religious Liberty: Emerging Conflicts. [Washington, D.C.]: Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, 2008. Print.