Animal Testing Research Paper

Environmentally friendly makeup is best because people can avoid worse case scenarios, harmful products, and animal testing so people can care for the earth while enjoying their make-up. European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) has recently conducted a study on the chemicals used in make-up and found that the number of animals used in make-up testing is unknown ( “Animal Testing: More than a Cosmetic Change”). This statistics show that some people have no idea about animal testing and the harmful things that are in make-up products.

Some ways to avoid worse case scenarios of makeup.”Suzanne was surprised to find out that nearly all of the personal care products she uses on her face and body contain ingredients suspected

of causing cancer; potential neuro-, liver-, and immunotoxins; and suspected hormone disruptors that could cause birth defects in any children she might bear in the future (“The Ugly Side Of Cosmetics”). Instead, the safety (or not) of the ingredients in these products is looked into almost exclusively by a manufacturer-controlled safety committee called the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) panel. Consequently, “89 percent of 10,500 ingredients used in personal care products have not been evaluated for safety by the CIR, the FDA, nor any other publicly accountable institution,” says the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG). Many consumers may be surprised to learn that the US federal government doesn’t require health studies or pre-market testing on personal care products. Manufacturers are free to put just about anything they want into cosmetics. “The absence of government oversight for this $35 billion industry leads to companies routinely marketing products with ingredients that are poorly studied, not studied at all, or worse, known to pose potentially serious health risks( “The Ugly Side of Cosmetics”).This fact shows how Suzanne found out how all of her hair products and makeup products are harmful to your body.

Looking out for the harmful toxins in makeup.”The scientists say the time is right for the new approach, in part because of more advanced electron microscopes and other imaging technologies
that allow scientists to capture the inner architecture of organs and their cells. Additionally, in vitro or cell culture-based studies of toxicity have vastly improved. In the past, scientists
often relied on short-lived, two-dimensional cultures of human liver cells to test for possible toxic effects; now scientists not only have more accurate 3D cell cultures at their disposal, but these cultures also last longer, allowing lab researchers to study the effects of a substance over a longer period of time(“ New Models in Cosmetics Replacing Animal Testing." ) This is saying that if people use makeup everyday there is most likely a chance that they can get cancer from the toxins that are in all the products. “The significant physiological differences between humans and the mice, rats, and other animals used to evaluate the safety of chemicals also can limit the validity of the results. “We need a better way to test toxic chemicals,” says toxicologist Kristie Sullivan, director of regulatory testing issues at the nonprofit Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine( “ New Models in Cosmetics Replacing Animal Testing.”) This piece of evidence is saying that people don’t know about how this affects animals and how they can kill these animals. Pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies have been using computational tools to evaluate toxicity for years. Generally, these methods look at the structure of the chemical compound or molecule under consideration, run it up against a database of chemicals with known toxicological effects, and search for substances with similar chemical structures. If a new chemical or ingredient lines up with one that has proven toxic in previous tests, this suggests the new compound could be similarly troublesome ( “ New Models in Cosmetics Replacing Animal Testing”.) This fact is talking about how other companies are trying to find a solution on how to get rid of the toxins that are in the makeup.

Things about animal testing that people don’t know about.Although they are not required by law, several tests are commonly performed that expose mice, rats, rabbits and guinea pigs to cosmetics ingredients.

These can include Skin and eye irritation tests where chemicals are rubbed onto the shaved skin or dripped into the eyes of restrained rabbits without any pain relief Repeated force-feeding studies lasting weeks or months to look for signs of general illness or specific health hazards such as cancer or birth defects Widely condemned "lethal dose" tests, in which animals are forced to swallow large amounts of a test chemical to determine the dose that causes death. (“Fact Sheet: Cosmetic Testing.”) This evidence proves that people still test animals even though it’s not required. At the end of a test the animals are killed, normally by asphyxiation, neck-breaking or decapitation. Pain relief is not provided. In the United States, a large percentage of the animals used in such testing (such as laboratory-bred rats and mice) are not counted in official statistics and receive no protection under the Animal Welfare Act.(“ Facts Sheet: Cosmetic Testing.”) This statistics shows that people do not care to kill animals after they torture them.The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines cosmetics as "articles intended to be applied to the human body for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the appearance without affecting the body's structure or functions." Examples include skin cream, perfume, lipstick, nail polish, eye and facial makeup, shampoo and hair color. Any ingredient used in a cosmetic also falls under this definition. Products normally labeled as cosmetics are classified as drugs when a medical claim is made. For example, toothpaste is sometimes classified as a cosmetic, but toothpaste that advertises cavity protection is a drug. The same is true for deodorants advertised as antiperspirants, shampoos that make anti-dandruff claims

and lotions that contain sunscreen.(“ Facts Sheet: Cosmetic Testing.”) This facts proves that everything that we use in our everyday life poor animals have to suffer just to make sure that we don’t get infections and etc.

Environmentally friendly makeup is best because people can avoid worse case scenarios, harmful products, and animal testing so people can care for the earth while enjoying their make-up. European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) has recently conducted a study on the chemicals used in make-up and found that the number of animals used in make-up testing is unknown ( “Animal Testing: More than a Cosmetic Change”). This statistics show that some people have no idea about animal testing and the harmful things that are in make-up products.

Some ways to avoid worse case scenarios of makeup.”Suzanne was surprised to find out that nearly all of the personal care products she uses on her face and body contain ingredients suspected of causing cancer; potential neuro-, liver-, and immunotoxins; and suspected hormone disruptors that could cause birth defects in any children she might bear in the future (“The Ugly Side Of Cosmetics”). Instead, the safety (or not) of the ingredients in these products is looked into almost exclusively by a manufacturer-controlled safety committee called the Cosmetic Ingredient Review (CIR) panel. Consequently, “89 percent of 10,500 ingredients used in personal care products have not been evaluated for safety by the CIR, the FDA, nor any other publicly accountable institution,” says the nonprofit Environmental Working Group (EWG). Many consumers may be surprised to learn that the US federal government doesn’t require health studies or pre-market testing on personal care products. Manufacturers are free to put just about anything they want into cosmetics. “The absence of government oversight for this $35 billion industry leads to companies routinely marketing products with ingredients that are poorly studied, not studied at all, or worse, known to pose potentially serious health risks( “The Ugly Side of Cosmetics”).This fact shows how Suzanne found out how all of her hair products and makeup products are harmful to your body.

Looking out for the harmful toxins in makeup.”The scientists say the time is right for the new approach, in part because of more advanced electron microscopes and other imaging technologies
that allow scientists to capture the inner architecture of organs and their cells. Additionally, in vitro or cell culture-based studies of toxicity have vastly improved. In the past, scientists
often relied on short-lived, two-dimensional cultures of human liver cells to test for possible toxic effects; now scientists not only have more accurate 3D cell cultures at their disposal, but these cultures also last longer, allowing lab researchers to study the effects of a substance over a longer period of time(“ New Models in Cosmetics Replacing Animal Testing." ) This is saying that if people use makeup everyday there is most likely a chance that they can get cancer from the toxins that are in all the products. “The significant physiological differences between humans and the mice, rats, and other animals used to evaluate the safety of chemicals also can limit the validity of the results. “We need a better way to test toxic chemicals,” says toxicologist Kristie Sullivan, director of regulatory testing issues at the nonprofit Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine( “ New Models in Cosmetics Replacing Animal Testing.”) This piece of evidence is saying that people don’t know about how this affects animals and how they can kill these animals. Pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies have been using computational tools to evaluate toxicity for years. Generally, these methods look at the structure of the chemical compound or molecule under consideration, run it up against a database of chemicals with known toxicological effects, and search for substances with similar chemical structures. If a new chemical or ingredient lines up with one that has proven toxic in previous tests, this suggests the new compound could be similarly troublesome ( “ New Models in Cosmetics Replacing Animal Testing”.) This fact is talking about how other companies are trying to find a solution on how to get rid of the toxins that are in the makeup.

Things about animal testing that people don’t know about.Although they are not required by law, several tests are commonly performed that expose mice, rats, rabbits and guinea pigs to cosmetics ingredients. These can include Skin and eye irritation tests where chemicals are rubbed onto the shaved skin or dripped into the eyes of restrained rabbits without any pain relief Repeated force-feeding studies lasting weeks or months to look for signs of general illness or specific health hazards such as cancer or birth defects Widely condemned "lethal dose" tests, in which animals are forced to swallow large amounts of a test chemical to determine the dose that causes death. (“Fact Sheet: Cosmetic Testing.”) This evidence proves that people still test animals even though it’s not required. At the end of a test the animals are killed, normally by asphyxiation, neck-breaking or decapitation. Pain relief is not provided. In the United States, a large percentage of the animals used in such testing (such as laboratory-bred rats and mice) are not counted in official statistics and receive no protection under the Animal Welfare Act.(“ Facts Sheet: Cosmetic Testing.”) This statistics shows that people do not care to kill animals after they torture them.The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines cosmetics as "articles intended to be applied to the human body for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the appearance without affecting the body's structure or functions." Examples include skin cream, perfume, lipstick, nail polish, eye and facial makeup, shampoo and hair color. Any ingredient used in a cosmetic also falls under this definition. Products normally labeled as cosmetics are classified as drugs when a medical claim is made. For example, toothpaste is sometimes classified as a cosmetic, but toothpaste that advertises cavity protection is a drug. The same is true for deodorants advertised as antiperspirants, shampoos that make anti-dandruff claims and lotions that contain sunscreen.(“ Facts Sheet: Cosmetic Testing.”) This facts proves that everything that we use in our everyday life poor animals have to suffer just to make sure that we don’t get infections and etc.